Senator Ted Cruz, R-Texas, has reintroduced a bill he thinks will speed US approval of drugs, biologics, or devices approved in other countries.
Senator Ted Cruz, R-Texas, reintroduced a bill he thinks will speed US approval of drugs, biologics, or devices approved in other countries.
The bill, called Reciprocity Ensures Streamlined Use of Lifesaving Treatments Act, or the RESULTS Act, would give the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) 30 days after a company sends in an application to decide whether it wants to greenlight a drug, device, or biologic approved in another country.
It’s at least the third time Cruz has introduced the bill (the last 2 times were in 2015 and 2017), which would give Congress the power to override an FDA rejection of a product. The 2 other cosponsors are Senators Ron Johnson, R-Wisconsin, and Mike Lee, R-Utah.
Cruz has said the bill could put downward pressure on the prices of drugs and devices as well as alleviate drug shortages.
The bill orders the FDA to review drug and device applications within 30 days and allow “reciprocal approval” of therapies from the European Union, Israel, Australia, Canada, and Japan.
In previous years, health advocates and FDA observers have noted pitfalls with the idea. For one thing, the idea of giving a political body such as Congress the power to overrule the FDA’s scientific experts on matters relating to public health, safety, efficacy, science, and other concerns raises major concerns.
Cruz, like some other conservatives, say that US patients don’t have speedy access to possible life-saving treatments. In a previous press release about the RESULTS Act, he said it is time for a “supply-side medical revolution.”
Last year, conservatives saw one related victory with the passage of the so-called right-to-try law. The Trickett Wendler, Frank Mongiello, Jordan McLinn, and Matthew Bellina Right to Try Act of 2018 creates an alternative pathway for dying patients who do not qualify for a clinical trial. The law bypasses the FDA's current expanded access and compassionate use programs and allows patients to appeal directly to drug companies.
That law, too, was based on the idea that the FDA does not move quickly enough.
The FDA approved 59 drugs in 2018, compared with 46 in 2017. Other studies have said that the FDA acts on applications more quickly than other regulatory authorities.
13 Strategies to Avoid the Nocebo Effect During Biosimilar Switching
December 18th 2024A systematic review identified 13 strategies, including patient and provider education, empathetic communication, and shared decision-making, to mitigate the nocebo effect in biosimilar switching, emphasizing the need for a multifaceted approach to improve patient perceptions and therapeutic outcomes.
Biosimilars Policy Roundup for September 2024—Podcast Edition
October 6th 2024On this episode of Not So Different, we discuss the FDA's approval of a new biosimilar for treating retinal conditions, which took place in September 2024 alongside other major industry developments, including ongoing legal disputes and broader trends in market dynamics and regulatory challenges.
BioRationality: Withdrawal of Proposed Terminal Disclaimer Rule Spells Major Setback for Biosimilars
December 10th 2024The United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO)’s withdrawal of its proposed terminal disclaimer rule is seen as a setback for biosimilar developers, as it preserves patent prosecution practices that favor originator companies and increases costs for biosimilar competition, according to Sarfaraz K. Niazi, PhD.
Commercial Payer Coverage of Biosimilars: Market Share, Pricing, and Policy Shifts
December 4th 2024Researchers observe significant shifts in payer preferences for originator vs biosimilar products from 2017 to 2022, revealing growing payer interest in multiple product options, alongside the increasing market share of biosimilars, which contributed to notable reductions in both average sales prices and wholesale acquisition costs.
Perceptions of Biosimilar Switching Among Veterans With IBD
December 2nd 2024Veterans with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) prioritize shared decision-making, transparency, and individualized care in biosimilar switching, favoring delayed switching for severe cases and greater patient control.