Denmark is the first nation in Europe—and in the world—to switch all well-treated rheumatoid arthritis patients from reference infliximab (Remicade) to the biosimilar Remsima, and 1 early study suggests that the switch has been successful. Patients, however, have needed convincing.
Denmark is the first nation in Europe—and in the world—to switch all well-treated rheumatoid arthritis patients from reference infliximab (Remicade) to the biosimilar Remsima, and 1 early study suggests that the switch has been successful.
The study, published in Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases, examined the non-medical switch of 802 Danish patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), psoriatic arthritis (PsA), and axial spondyloarthritis (AxSpA) from the reference to the biosimilar infliximab. The researchers investigated the patients’ disease activity 3 months prior to and 3 months after the switch and subsequently measured changes over time. The 403 patients with RA, 120 patients with PsA, and 279 with AxSpA had been treated with the reference infliximab for a median duration of 6.8 years (range, 4.3 to 9.5). Follow-up was conducted at 413 days (range, 339 to 442). The researchers found that disease activities were similar 3 months before and after the switch, and concluded that the switch had no negative impact on disease activity.
The results suggest that Denmark could realize a substantial cost savings in the treatment of RA by switching patients to a lower-cost, high-quality biosimilar treatment. Yet, however willing Denmark’s health system may be to make the switch from reference to biosimilar products, Danish patients have been reluctant to switch from more familiar biologics to less expensive biosimilars.
A statement provided by the European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) says that many patients felt anxious about the national switch to biosimilars and their concerns were exacerbated by several factors:
To address these apprehensions, the Danish Rheumatism Association (DRA), a non-governmental organization with an 80,000-person membership, engaged with politicians, medical authorities, and hospital administrations in a 4-pronged plan, which ran from August 2015 through the end of 2016, and had the following objectives:
Additionally, representatives from the DRA have participated in working groups in hospitals across the nation’s regions with the objective of including the patient perspective in future national recommendations concerning biological drugs, biosimilars, and switching.
The US healthcare system differs significantly from the government-sponsored Danish system, in which patients could be made to switch treatments unless a medically justified reason prevented treatment with the biosimilar. In the United States, patients may have more say in their own treatment protocols, and may prove reluctant to switch treatments if they do not feel that biosimilars provide as much safety and efficacy as they do affordability. Manufacturers, payers, and other stakeholders seeking to drive biosimilar uptake in the United States may wish to look to the DRA’s example in advocating for and facilitating greater education and safety monitoring as a means of alleviating patient concerns.
13 Strategies to Avoid the Nocebo Effect During Biosimilar Switching
December 18th 2024A systematic review identified 13 strategies, including patient and provider education, empathetic communication, and shared decision-making, to mitigate the nocebo effect in biosimilar switching, emphasizing the need for a multifaceted approach to improve patient perceptions and therapeutic outcomes.
Biosimilars Policy Roundup for September 2024—Podcast Edition
October 6th 2024On this episode of Not So Different, we discuss the FDA's approval of a new biosimilar for treating retinal conditions, which took place in September 2024 alongside other major industry developments, including ongoing legal disputes and broader trends in market dynamics and regulatory challenges.
Commercial Payer Coverage of Biosimilars: Market Share, Pricing, and Policy Shifts
December 4th 2024Researchers observe significant shifts in payer preferences for originator vs biosimilar products from 2017 to 2022, revealing growing payer interest in multiple product options, alongside the increasing market share of biosimilars, which contributed to notable reductions in both average sales prices and wholesale acquisition costs.
The Rebate War: How Originator Companies Are Fighting Back Against Biosimilars
November 25th 2024Few biologics in the US have multiple biosimilar competitors, but originator biologics respond quickly to competition by increasing rebates and lowering net prices, despite short approval-to-launch timelines for biosimilars.
Boosting Health Care Sustainability: The Role of Biosimilars in Latin America
November 21st 2024Biosimilars could improve access to biologic treatments and health care sustainability in Latin America, but their adoption is hindered by misconceptions, regulatory gaps, and weak pharmacovigilance, requiring targeted education and stronger regulations.