Eric Tichy, PharmD, MBA, vice chair of pharmacy formulary at the Mayo Clinic Health System, discusses the importance of state legislation to boost biosimilar access and uptake.
Eric Tichy, PharmD, MBA, vice chair of pharmacy formulary at the Mayo Clinic Health System, discusses the importance of state legislation to boost biosimilar access and uptake.
Transcript:
You had the opportunity to provide comment to Minnesota congressional leaders about HF 1516, a bill aimed at increasing patient access to biosimilar. Could you explain what this bill is and why more bills like this are needed?
Tichy:
So, one of the reasons for this bill is that we found there were some barriers to biosimilar implementation. We've seen this in our experience, and it's been noted by other organizations and other health care leaders. One of the biggest barriers is actually sometimes you run into health plans that will prefer an innovator product. And it may be because they have some kind of rebate or some other situation that makes them prefer the innovator product.
We've actually run into scenarios where that innovator product is 3 times more expensive than the biosimilar product. We felt that we needed some incentives to push the practice to be able to use biosimilars, like our providers wanted to use biosimilars, our patients wanted to use a biosimilar, and we were having payers that weren't allowing us to do that.
There's also some of those logistical issues with stocking products. This bill would help get biosimilars treated more similarly to how we treat generic drugs, where we have the dispensing organization decide which product gets used. The payers don't micromanage which generic drug that we use, and the payers do a lot of important things to save cost. And we would just say, trust us to sort of drive to the lowest cost, we'll pass that on. And you can focus on other things where you can bring value to health care and reduce overall health care costs.
13 Strategies to Avoid the Nocebo Effect During Biosimilar Switching
December 18th 2024A systematic review identified 13 strategies, including patient and provider education, empathetic communication, and shared decision-making, to mitigate the nocebo effect in biosimilar switching, emphasizing the need for a multifaceted approach to improve patient perceptions and therapeutic outcomes.
Biosimilars Policy Roundup for September 2024—Podcast Edition
October 6th 2024On this episode of Not So Different, we discuss the FDA's approval of a new biosimilar for treating retinal conditions, which took place in September 2024 alongside other major industry developments, including ongoing legal disputes and broader trends in market dynamics and regulatory challenges.
BioRationality: Withdrawal of Proposed Terminal Disclaimer Rule Spells Major Setback for Biosimilars
December 10th 2024The United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO)’s withdrawal of its proposed terminal disclaimer rule is seen as a setback for biosimilar developers, as it preserves patent prosecution practices that favor originator companies and increases costs for biosimilar competition, according to Sarfaraz K. Niazi, PhD.
Commercial Payer Coverage of Biosimilars: Market Share, Pricing, and Policy Shifts
December 4th 2024Researchers observe significant shifts in payer preferences for originator vs biosimilar products from 2017 to 2022, revealing growing payer interest in multiple product options, alongside the increasing market share of biosimilars, which contributed to notable reductions in both average sales prices and wholesale acquisition costs.
Perceptions of Biosimilar Switching Among Veterans With IBD
December 2nd 2024Veterans with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) prioritize shared decision-making, transparency, and individualized care in biosimilar switching, favoring delayed switching for severe cases and greater patient control.