Hope Rugo, MD, director of the breast oncology clinical trials program at the University of California at San Francisco, describes the challenges associated with treating different subtypes of breast cancer.
Transcript:
Which molecular subtype of breast cancer is the most challenging, treatment-wise?
Well, in terms of subtypes of breast cancer, really the challenges are—the challenges are different, but there are 2 areas of great challenge.
One is triple-negative disease that doesn’t respond to chemotherapy. That is a very difficult to treat disease, incredibly frustrating and depressing (of course more so for the patient than for us) but it’s tough as an oncologist.
I think we’re really looking towards immunotherapy being an area for us to be able to manipulate and improve outcome. We should have data about the first phase 3 immunotherapy trial later this year; we’re hopeful in any case with chemotherapy in metastatic disease. We already have some encouraging results but clearly this is very, very challenging.
Brain metastases that are refractory to radiation, incredibly challenging situation. And then the biggest patient population of challenges is [estrogen receptor—positive, ER-positive] disease that we think, “Well we have hormone therapy,” but we see late relapses. In the last month I’ve had a ton of people have a late relapse from ER-positive breast cancer, and they said to me, “Wait a minute I was 15 years out how could I have bone mets now?” or 11 years or 10.5 and you’ve just stopped their 10 years of endocrine therapy.
So, I think that that remains a huge challenge. The understanding of dormancy and pathways that are critical to us to target to try and avoid the survival of these clones that can then recur many, many years later, is really an important area of research.
How Vertical Integration Drives Innovation and Access in Biosimilars
December 27th 2024Elie Bahou, PharmD, highlights how vertical integration in the biosimilar industry streamlines costs, improves supply reliability, accelerates market adoption, and enhances patient access, while emphasizing the value of collaboration, quality control, and value-based contracts for sustainable health care delivery.
Biosimilars in America: Overcoming Barriers and Maximizing Impact
July 21st 2024Join us as we explore the complexities of the US biosimilars market, discussing legislative influences, payer and provider adoption factors, and strategies to overcome industry challenges with expert insights from Kyle Noonan, PharmD, MS, value & access strategy manager at Cencora.
Breaking Barriers in Osteoporosis Care: New Denosumab Biosimilars Wyost, Jubbonti Approved
June 16th 2024In this episode, The Center for Biosimilars® delves into the FDA approval of the first denosumab biosimilars, Wyost and Jubbonti (denosumab-bbdz), and discuss their potential to revolutionize osteoporosis treatment with expert insights from 2 rheumatologists.
Q&A With Dr Chelsee Jensen: Navigating FDA Approvals, Challenges in the Biosimilar Landscape
January 14th 2024Chelsee Jensen, PharmD, BCPS, senior pharmacy specialist and pharmaceutical formulary manager at Mayo Clinic, reacts to the biggest FDA approvals of 2023 and how she sees the adalimumab, natalizumab, and tocilizumab spaces playing out.
Q&A: Dr Kimberly Maxfield Explains How BsUFA III Will Advance the US Biosimilar Industry
December 20th 2023At AMCP Nexus, Kimberly Maxfield, PhD, pharmacologist at the FDA, delved into how the third reauthorization of the Biosimilar User Fee Act (BsUFA III) will shape the American biosimilar market and improve development efficiency over the next few years.