Ryan Haumschild, PharmD, MS, MBA, from Emory Healthcare and Winship Cancer Institute, explains how stakeholders may view the economic value of biosimilars differently based on their goals and his predictions for how biosimilar utilization will develop in the future.
Transcript
How has the economic value of oncology biosimilars changed over time and how do the economic benefits differ between stakeholders?
Haumschild: I think the economic values continue to grow. We've seen from our European colleagues that they've been able to uptake these medications sooner and really reduce cost. And I think that's what a lot of us are interested in—how do we preserve efficacy and reduce cost? So, I think the economic benefits can continue to grow.
But it is different depending on the different stakeholder. So, from our payer colleagues, they are looking at rebating and getting the total cost of care down on their end by larger rebates and preferencing therapy. Whereas, on the hospital side, we're also looking at uptake of biosimilars to reduce the cost of care and still provide efficacious options. I think it's going to be interesting, though, in the future as more agents come forward, and the rebating continues, and how does that degrade the average sales price for the health systems, where it still provides economic value, and it'll be more interesting of how it impacts reimbursement moving forward.
What utilization trends have you observed and what are your predictions for how the oncology biosimilar space will evolve going forward?
Haumschild: Utilization is continuing to grow. I think that's something that we're excited about. And as we see more therapies come into the market, I think people are starting to recognize that having an adoption strategy is important. I think with that adoption strategy, people are becoming smarter in the way that they're building out their electronic medical records, deciding to designate policies in order to provide a better uptake and faster uptake. And I think at the same time, as payer colleagues are to preference biosimilars, we see it to grow. So, that being said, I know we have a lot of market approvals coming up in the next few years. I personally am really excited, and I think this will, in turn, create larger utilization and cost savings across the country and actually reduce the amount of spend in the US directly related to biosimilars.
Enhancing Adoption of Infused Biosimilars for a Sustainable Future
October 30th 2024An IQVIA report highlights challenges to the sustainability of infused biosimilars in the US, citing rebate walls and reimbursement policies, and proposes key solutions to enhance adoption and benefits for all stakeholders.
Biosimilars Policy Roundup for September 2024—Podcast Edition
October 6th 2024On this episode of Not So Different, we discuss the FDA's approval of a new biosimilar for treating retinal conditions, which took place in September 2024 alongside other major industry developments, including ongoing legal disputes and broader trends in market dynamics and regulatory challenges.
Strengthening the Supply Chain: Key Insights From FDA Commissioner Dr Robert Califf
October 25th 2024At the GRx+Biosims conference, FDA Commissioner Robert Califf, MD, stressed the urgent need for data transparency in the global supply chain and the role of collaboration and artificial intelligence in ensuring the resilience of biosimilar and generic drug production.
FDA and Industry Experts Unpack Biosimilar Device Requirements
October 23rd 2024At the GRx+Biosims 2024 conference, a panel of industry experts and FDA officials discussed evolving device requirements for biosimilars and interchangeable biosimilars, highlighting new approaches to comparative use human factors studies, regulatory challenges, and alternative validation methods.