Reuters is reporting that pharmaceutical companies may be shifting the amount of taxes they owe in the United States by holding their valuable drug patents overseas.
Reuters is reporting that pharmaceutical companies may be shifting the amount of taxes they owe in the United States by holding their valuable drug patents overseas.
When the Trump administration cut the corporate tax rate to 21% from 35% with the approval of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, the rationale for the cut was putting a halt to outsourcing and providing an incentive for companies to keep businesses and jobs within the United States. However, drug companies like AbbVie, indicated Reuters, may be using loopholes within the law to profit from the change.
Richard Gonzalez, AbbVie’s CEO, told investors earlier this year that, due to the tax cut (which requires only profits reported by domestic subsidiaries to pay US tax), the company expects its tax rate to fall to 9% on a projected revenue of $32 billion.
Despite basing most of its research facilities in the United States, Reuters indicates that AbbVie has never recorded a profit in the United States and has reported its income in lower-tax jurisdictions, in part due to holding 88 patents for adalimumab (Humira) in Bermuda, a country that does not tax corporate profits.
In 2017, AbbVie reported $10.4 billion of foreign profits before taxes on an international revenue of $9.97 billion. Conversely, from 2013 to 2016, AbbVie reportedly paid around $1 billion a year in taxes in the United States when it took earnings reported by foreign subsidies back home to cover expenses from US-based facilities.
To avoid such profit-shifting, the government attached a provision to the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act called Global Intangible Low Tax Income (GILTI). The provision states that if a company profits from a so-called tax haven, it will be liable to have the profit taxed as income generated in the United States. However, the tax rate that applies is only half the US tax rate.
Though the exact process utilized by AbbVie to report such low tax rates is not disclosed to the public, analysts and academics within the field have noted that corporate filings often show drug companies reduce taxes by holding patents in a low or zero corporate tax country. Using this method, the affiliate companies which manufacture or market the drug pay the tax haven subsidiary royalty fees for the right to use the patent.
AbbVie is not the only pharmaceutical company benefitting from the new tax law. Amgen has reported a 14% to 15% tax rate for 2018, comparable to 17% for Pfizer and 18% for Eli Lilly.
How AI Can Help Address Cost-Related Nonadherence to Biologic, Biosimilar Treatment
March 9th 2025Despite saving billions, biosimilars still account for only a small share of the biologics market—what's standing in the way of broader adoption and how can artificial intelligence (AI) help change that?
Will the FTC Be More PBM-Friendly Under a Second Trump Administration?
February 23rd 2025On this episode of Not So Different, we explore the Federal Trade Commission’s (FTC) second interim report on pharmacy benefit managers (PBMs) with Joe Wisniewski from Turquoise Health, discussing key issues like preferential reimbursement, drug pricing transparency, biosimilars, shifting regulations, and how a second Trump administration could reshape PBM practices.
From Amjevita to Zarxio: A Decade of US Biosimilar Approvals
March 6th 2025Since the FDA’s groundbreaking approval of Zarxio in 2015, the US biosimilars market has surged to 67 approvals across 18 originators—though the journey has been anything but smooth, with adoption facing hurdles along the way.