UK Prime Minister Theresa May has called for the United Kingdom to remain a member of the European Medicines Agency (EMA), but the European Council says that "The Union will preserve its autonomy as regards its decision-making, which excludes participation of the United Kingdom as a third-country to EU Institutions."
Earlier this month, UK Prime Minister Theresa May gave a speech discussing the future of the United Kingdom’s relationship with the European Union. In her speech, May called for the United Kingdom to remain a member of the European Medicines Agency (EMA), which is currently being relocated from London, United Kingdom, to Amsterdam, Netherlands in preparation for Brexit.
In response, the General Secretariat of the Council sent a note on its draft guidelines to the Permanent Representatives Committee.
While the Council’s note reiterated the European Union’s determination to have “as close as possible a partnership” with the United Kingdom in the future, one that would cover trade and economic cooperation as well as other areas, such as security, defense, and foreign policy, it said that “The European Council further reiterates that the Union will preserve its autonomy as regards its decision-making, which excludes participation of the United Kingdom as a third-country to EU Institutions, agencies or bodies. The role of the Court of Justice of the European Union will also be fully respected.” This assertion stands in contrast to May’s statement that the UK Parliament would “would remain ultimately sovereign” with respect to adopting or not adopting the EMA’s rules and regulations.
Furthermore, the European Council noted that it must “…take into account the repeatedly stated positions of the UK, which limit the depth of such a future partnership. Being outside the Customs Union and the Single Market will inevitably lead to frictions."
Importantly, the European Commission’s draft guidelines also noted the following:
According to the Financial Times, the United Kingdom’s Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency is currently leading 35% of the EMA’s medicines safety monitoring programs, and about 40% of the evaluation of highly complex therapies.
Review Calls for Path to Global Harmonization of Biosimilar Development Regulations
March 17th 2025Global biosimilar regulatory harmonization will be needed to reduce development costs and improve patient access, despite challenges posed by differing national requirements and regulatory frameworks, according to review authors.
Will the FTC Be More PBM-Friendly Under a Second Trump Administration?
February 23rd 2025On this episode of Not So Different, we explore the Federal Trade Commission’s (FTC) second interim report on pharmacy benefit managers (PBMs) with Joe Wisniewski from Turquoise Health, discussing key issues like preferential reimbursement, drug pricing transparency, biosimilars, shifting regulations, and how a second Trump administration could reshape PBM practices.
From Amjevita to Zarxio: A Decade of US Biosimilar Approvals
March 6th 2025Since the FDA’s groundbreaking approval of Zarxio in 2015, the US biosimilars market has surged to 67 approvals across 18 originators—though the journey has been anything but smooth, with adoption facing hurdles along the way.
A New Chapter: How 2023 Will Shape the US Biosimilar Space for 2024 and Beyond
December 31st 2023On this episode of Not So Different, Cencora's Brian Biehn and Corey Ford take a look back at major policy and regulatory advancements in 2023 and how these changes will alter the space going forward.
Biosimilar Approvals Streamlined With Advanced Statistics Amidst Differing Regulatory Requirements
February 25th 2025The FDA and European Medicines Agency (EMA) mandate high similarity between biosimilars and reference products, but their regulatory processes differ, especially with multiple reference products.