Using electronic health records (EHRs) to create a learning healthcare system, say the authors, can enable researchers to generate new knowledge that will accrue benefits to future generations of patients.
Real-world data are increasingly viewed as a crucial factor in the eventual acceptance of biosimilar drugs, and indeed, current real-world evidence points to the safety and efficacy of these products in the marketplace. In a recent paper, officials from the European Medicines Agency, the Organisation for Economic Cooperation, and other European government entities explained that such data can help make decisions about pharmaceuticals—from development to reimbursement—more efficient. To that end, the authors called for international cooperation on a learning healthcare system that will better harness these data.
The authors note that the expense of prospective data generation in a research setting is high, limiting the number of research questions that can be answered in a randomized controlled trial (RCT). Furthermore, RCTs are rarely large enough to detect infrequent outcomes, nor are they long enough to determine long-term outcomes.
Using electronic health records (EHRs) to create a learning healthcare system, say the authors, can enable researchers to generate new knowledge that will accrue benefits to future generations of patients. However, current inadequacies of EHRs present a “technical bottleneck” to the objective of gathering real-world data.
The paper’s authors propose that governments establish and implement national health data governance frameworks to encourage the use of personal health data to serve the public interest. They also call for public engagement about the use of EHRs, policies that will support high-quality EHR data, incorporation of EHRs in national health statistics, linkage of EHRs with other key data for research, and cooperation among pharmaceutical developers and healthcare systems. Finally, the authors say, the collection of data must translate into the production of useful evidence.
“Perpetuating the 20th century model of the dedicated research setting and relying (almost exclusively) on RCTs will not allow for translating the current pace of progress in the life sciences into new and better treatment for patients,” say the authors. A coordinated and international effort will be key to speed the implementation of a true learning healthcare system for global benefit.
Reference
Eichler HG, Bloechl-Daum B, Broick K, et al. Data rich, information poor; can we use electronic health records to create a learning healthcare system for pharmaceuticals? [published online September 4, 2018] Clin Pharmacol Ther. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1002/cpt.1226. Accessed October 4, 2018.
Enhancing Adoption of Infused Biosimilars for a Sustainable Future
October 30th 2024An IQVIA report highlights challenges to the sustainability of infused biosimilars in the US, citing rebate walls and reimbursement policies, and proposes key solutions to enhance adoption and benefits for all stakeholders.
Biosimilars Policy Roundup for September 2024—Podcast Edition
October 6th 2024On this episode of Not So Different, we discuss the FDA's approval of a new biosimilar for treating retinal conditions, which took place in September 2024 alongside other major industry developments, including ongoing legal disputes and broader trends in market dynamics and regulatory challenges.
Strengthening the Supply Chain: Key Insights From FDA Commissioner Dr Robert Califf
October 25th 2024At the GRx+Biosims conference, FDA Commissioner Robert Califf, MD, stressed the urgent need for data transparency in the global supply chain and the role of collaboration and artificial intelligence in ensuring the resilience of biosimilar and generic drug production.
FDA and Industry Experts Unpack Biosimilar Device Requirements
October 23rd 2024At the GRx+Biosims 2024 conference, a panel of industry experts and FDA officials discussed evolving device requirements for biosimilars and interchangeable biosimilars, highlighting new approaches to comparative use human factors studies, regulatory challenges, and alternative validation methods.