Biocon announced today in a letter to the National Stock Exchange of India that the FDA has extended its target action date for a regulatory decision on the drug maker’s trastuzumab biosimilar.
Biocon announced today in a letter to the National Stock Exchange of India that the FDA has extended its target action date for a regulatory decision on the drug maker’s trastuzumab biosimilar.
A company spokesperson said that the FDA “has notified our partner Mylan that they will extend the target action date for their [trastuzumab] 351(k) application to December 3, 2017 in order to review some of the clarificatory information submitted to them as part of the application review process. This [3-]month extension has no impact on the anticipated timetable for commercialization of this product in the [United States].”
A regulatory decision on the Indian drug maker’s biosimilar, MYL-1401O (referenced on Genentech’s Herceptin), had been expected on or before its Biosimilar User Fee Act date of September 3, 2017. The drug received a unanimous recommendation of approval from the FDA’s Oncologic Drugs Advisory Committee (ODAC) in July.
However, the drug has faced regulatory challenges in the European Union; earlier this month, Biocon withdrew its filings for both its trastuzumab product and its pegfilgrastim candidate from the European Medicines Agency (EMA). Biocon indicated that it would resubmit its applications to the EMA after regulators complete a re-inspection of its manufacturing facility in Bangalore. The re-inspection is required after France’s health regulatory body, the French National Agency for Medicines and Health Products Safety (ANSM), found that Biocon had failed to comply with good manufacturing practices in the production of 3 biosimilar products (including trastuzumab). ANSM identified 35 problems related to drug product manufacturing and quality control operations, and called 11 of those problems “major deficiencies.”
It is unclear whether the FDA’s delay of a decision on Biocon’s trastuzumab is related to the deficiencies in good manufacturing practices identified by ANSM or to the re-inspection of the facility. However, the FDA and the EMA recently signed a new confidentiality agreement allowing the agencies to share full inspection reports, including nonpublic, commercially confidential information related to inspections.
Will the FTC Be More PBM-Friendly Under a Second Trump Administration?
February 23rd 2025On this episode of Not So Different, we explore the Federal Trade Commission’s (FTC) second interim report on pharmacy benefit managers (PBMs) with Joe Wisniewski from Turquoise Health, discussing key issues like preferential reimbursement, drug pricing transparency, biosimilars, shifting regulations, and how a second Trump administration could reshape PBM practices.
Biosimilar Approvals Streamlined With Advanced Statistics Amidst Differing Regulatory Requirements
February 25th 2025The FDA and European Medicines Agency (EMA) mandate high similarity between biosimilars and reference products, but their regulatory processes differ, especially with multiple reference products.
Biosimilars in America: Overcoming Barriers and Maximizing Impact
July 21st 2024Join us as we explore the complexities of the US biosimilars market, discussing legislative influences, payer and provider adoption factors, and strategies to overcome industry challenges with expert insights from Kyle Noonan, PharmD, MS, value & access strategy manager at Cencora.
FDA, EMA Approve Second Pair of Denosumab Biosimilars
February 17th 2025The FDA and European Medicines Agency (EMA) granted approval, with interchangeability in the US, to Samsung Bioepis' denosumab biosimilars, which will be marketed under different names depending on whether they will be used to treat osteoporosis or bone metastases.