Spectrum Pharmaceuticals has withdrawn its Biologics License Application (BLA) for eflapegrastim, a granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) therapy that the company had hoped to sell under the brand name Rolontis.
Spectrum Pharmaceuticals has withdrawn its Biologics License Application (BLA) for eflapegrastim, a granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) therapy that the company had hoped to sell under the brand name Rolontis.
According to the drug maker, the FDA requested additional manufacturing information, though the agency did not ask for further clinical studies. The company said that it needs more time to provide some of the requested information to the agency, and that it would be unlikely to be able to meet the FDA’s request prior to the end of the initial review period.
Spectrum says that it plans to resubmit a revised BLA for eflapegrastim in the future. “We are continuing to have productive discussions with the FDA and will deliver the additional information needed to support the application,” Joe Turgeon, president and chief executive officer of Spectrum, said in a statement. “We remain confident in the Rolontis program and look forward to a successful resubmission and its ultimate approval.”
The drug had been expected to compete with pegfilgrastim (Neulasta) and its biosimilars (the recently FDA-approved and US-launched Fulphila and Udenyca) for market share; the long-acting G-CSF agent has demonstrated a 2- to 3-fold increase in area under the time‐concentration curve for absolute neutrophil count versus pegfilgrastim when administered at similar doses, and the proposed drug also demonstrated comparable efficacy compared with pegfilgrastim in an open-label study in patients with breast cancer who were receiving docetaxel and cyclophosphamide. Finally, no new safety concerns were noted during the clinical program.
However, now that biosimilars of pegfilgrastim are entering the marketplace and are competing with Neulasta, it remains to be seen whether there will be an appetite for a costly brand-name G-CSF agent among a field of less expensive biosimilar options.
How AI Can Help Address Cost-Related Nonadherence to Biologic, Biosimilar Treatment
March 9th 2025Despite saving billions, biosimilars still account for only a small share of the biologics market—what's standing in the way of broader adoption and how can artificial intelligence (AI) help change that?
Will the FTC Be More PBM-Friendly Under a Second Trump Administration?
February 23rd 2025On this episode of Not So Different, we explore the Federal Trade Commission’s (FTC) second interim report on pharmacy benefit managers (PBMs) with Joe Wisniewski from Turquoise Health, discussing key issues like preferential reimbursement, drug pricing transparency, biosimilars, shifting regulations, and how a second Trump administration could reshape PBM practices.
Biosimilar Approvals Streamlined With Advanced Statistics Amidst Differing Regulatory Requirements
February 25th 2025The FDA and European Medicines Agency (EMA) mandate high similarity between biosimilars and reference products, but their regulatory processes differ, especially with multiple reference products.