On Tuesday, the FDA held a public meeting titled “Administering the Hatch-Waxman Amendments: Ensuring a Balance Between Innovation and Access.”
On Tuesday, the FDA held a public meeting titled “Administering the Hatch-Waxman Amendments: Ensuring a Balance Between Innovation and Access.” The meeting provided an opportunity for the public to submit comments concerning the ways in which the FDA administers the Hatch-Waxman Amendments with respect to prioritizing the approval of generic drugs.
The Hatch-Waxman Act (formally titled The Drug Price Competition and Patent Term Restoration Act) was first implemented in 1984. The act was intended to expedite the approval of generic drugs, provide periods of patent exclusivity, and streamline the litigation process surrounding generic drugs. The FDA called this week’s public meeting to hear comments on how the FDA can help establish a balance between encouraging innovation and facilitating the availability of lower-cost generic drugs for patients.
FDA Commissioner Scott Gottlieb, MD, opened the meeting by noting that too many patients are unable to afford necessary drugs. “FDA doesn’t have a direct role in how drugs are priced,” Gottlieb said, “but at FDA, we do play a key, if indirect, role in the eventual cost of medicines.” He went on to explain that the FDA will seek to reduce prices by ensuring that the agency is efficient, predictable, and science-based with respect to its regulatory requirements, and that it will prioritize price competition among drugs.
Gottlieb also announced that the FDA is developing 2 new documents that will help streamline the Abbreviated New Drug Application (ANDA) process. First, the agency will issue a “Good ANDA Assessment Practices” Manual of Policies and Procedures (MAPP). This document will outline approaches to streamlining the ANDA review process. Second, the FDA will issue a “Good ANDA Submission Practices” guidance document that will detail common deficiencies that the agency sees in applications, and will provide advice on how to avoid these problems.
Following Gottlieb’s remarks, members of the public addressed a panel comprising representatives from the FDA and the Federal Trade Commission. Individuals representing academic and research, payer and provider, pharmaceutical product development, and patient and consumer perspectives provided comments to the panel.
Across the variety of stakeholder perspectives, some common themes and concerns emerged:
In closing the meeting, Keith Flanagan of the FDA’s Office of Generic Drugs and the Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, said that it will take the agency time to digest the information that it has received from the public, and that it will leverage the insights gained through public comment. In addition to considering presentations made at the meeting, the agency will also review comments made on the its docket.
Among those who have already submitted written comments to the docket are former Representative Henry Waxman, one of the co-sponsors of the original Hatch-Waxman legislation. Waxman's remarks include a report, “Getting to the Root of High Prescription Drug Prices,” that describes drivers of high prescription drug costs and potential actions that could be taken to address those costs. Among Waxman’s recommendations are that the FDA:
Electronic comments may be submitted on docket number FDA-2017-N-3615 until September 18, 2017.
Will the FTC Be More PBM-Friendly Under a Second Trump Administration?
February 23rd 2025On this episode of Not So Different, we explore the Federal Trade Commission’s (FTC) second interim report on pharmacy benefit managers (PBMs) with Joe Wisniewski from Turquoise Health, discussing key issues like preferential reimbursement, drug pricing transparency, biosimilars, shifting regulations, and how a second Trump administration could reshape PBM practices.
Review Calls for Path to Global Harmonization of Biosimilar Development Regulations
March 17th 2025Global biosimilar regulatory harmonization will be needed to reduce development costs and improve patient access, despite challenges posed by differing national requirements and regulatory frameworks, according to review authors.
Biosimilars Policy Roundup for September 2024—Podcast Edition
October 6th 2024On this episode of Not So Different, we discuss the FDA's approval of a new biosimilar for treating retinal conditions, which took place in September 2024 alongside other major industry developments, including ongoing legal disputes and broader trends in market dynamics and regulatory challenges.
From Amjevita to Zarxio: A Decade of US Biosimilar Approvals
March 6th 2025Since the FDA’s groundbreaking approval of Zarxio in 2015, the US biosimilars market has surged to 67 approvals across 18 originators—though the journey has been anything but smooth, with adoption facing hurdles along the way.