Pfizer announced on December 13 that the FDA has approved Ixifi, PF-06438179, infliximab-qbtx, the company’s second biosimilar to the reference infliximab, Remicade.
Pfizer announced on December 13 that the FDA has approved Ixifi, PF-06438179, infliximab-qbtx, the company’s second biosimilar to the reference infliximab, Remicade.
Approval of the biosimilar follows acceptance of Ixifi’s Biologics License Application (BLA) in April 2017, and is based on the totality of evidence demonstrating a high degree of similarity to the reference Remicade. Pfizer’s BLA included data from the REFLECTIONS B537-02 study in patients with moderate to severe rheumatoid arthritis (RA).
The phase 3, multi-national, randomized, double-blind, 2-arm, parallel-group study evaluated the safety, efficacy, and immunogenicity of the biosimilar compared with the reference infliximab administered intravenously in combination with methotrexate. The study met its primary endpoint of achieving a response of ACR20—a 20% improvement by American College of Rheumatology criteria—at week 14. These findings were supported by additional data at week 30.
The FDA has approved Ixifi as a treatment for patients with RA, Crohn disease, pediatric Crohn disease, ulcerative colitis, ankylosing spondylitis, psoriatic arthritis, and plaque psoriasis.
Pfizer adds Ixifi to its portfolio of biosimilars, including Inflectra, the first FDA-approved biosimilar infliximab, as well as European Medicines Agency- (EMA) approved Retacrit (epoetin zeta), and EMA-approved Nivestim (filgrastim). However, a Pfizer representative told The Center for Biosimilars® that the company does not plan to commercialize Ixifi in the United States. Pfizer will continue to market its first infliximab biosimilar, Inflectra, in the US market, said the representative, and the approval of Ixifi will not impact its strategy with Inflectra.
Inflectra has had a challenging experience in the US market; while Pfizer’s first FDA-approved infliximab biosimilar has launched in the United States, Johnson & Johnson’s strategies to protect its market share have led Pfizer to file suit against the reference product’s sponsor, claiming that anti-competitive practices have effectively denied patients access to lower-cost biosimilars.
Sandoz, which acquired the European rights to Ixifi in 2016, plans to develop and eventually commercialize the drug in the 28 EU member states as well as Iceland, Liechtenstein, and Norway.
How State Substitution Laws Shape Insulin Biosimilar Adoption
April 15th 2025States with fewer restrictions on biosimilar substitution tend to see higher uptake of interchangeable insulin glargine, showing how even small policy details can significantly influence biosimilar adoption and expand access to more affordable insulin.
How AI Can Help Address Cost-Related Nonadherence to Biologic, Biosimilar Treatment
March 9th 2025Despite saving billions, biosimilars still account for only a small share of the biologics market—what's standing in the way of broader adoption and how can artificial intelligence (AI) help change that?
Experts Pressure Congress to Remove Roadblocks for Biosimilars
April 12th 2025Lawmakers and expert witnesses emphasized the potential of biosimilars to lower health care costs by overcoming barriers like pharmacy benefit manager practices, limited awareness, and regulatory delays to improve access and competition in chronic disease management during a recent congressional hearing.
Will the FTC Be More PBM-Friendly Under a Second Trump Administration?
February 23rd 2025On this episode of Not So Different, we explore the Federal Trade Commission’s (FTC) second interim report on pharmacy benefit managers (PBMs) with Joe Wisniewski from Turquoise Health, discussing key issues like preferential reimbursement, drug pricing transparency, biosimilars, shifting regulations, and how a second Trump administration could reshape PBM practices.
Risk-Adjusted NPV Framework for Biosimilars Shows Key Investment Drivers
April 7th 2025Early market entry, manufacturing efficiency, and market share are critical to biosimilar development success, while technical complexity and competition heavily impact returns, according to a study presenting a risk-adjusted net present value (NPV) analysis framework.