FDA Commissioner Scott Gottlieb, MD, unveiled his plan to slow drug price increases, in part by making it easier for generic drugs to be approved and increasing competition.
In an appearance before the House appropriations subcommittee, which is deciding on the FDA’s budget for next year, Gottlieb said his Drug Competition Action Plan would make it easier for generic drugs to enter the US market by accelerating the FDA’s review process, which has a current backlog of over 2600 applications. Gottlieb also called for a simpler approach to reviewing applications for biosimilars of complex biologic drugs, including Sanofi’s Lantus insulin and Mylan’s EpiPen. Gottlieb has previously advocated a faster path to marketing new and generic drugs.
Gottlieb’s plan might also receive a boost from the lift of the hiring freeze on the FDA, which came to light during the hearing.
Acknowledging that the FDA does not play a direct role in drug pricing, Gottlieb said the agency can take steps to facilitate entry of lower-cost alternatives to the market and increase competition. Stating that legislative action would be needed to overhaul the drug approval process, Gottlieb noted that among the actions the FDA could take was reviewing situations in which brand-name drug makers try to slow approval of generic competitors. Both the Senate and House have introduced bills that would allow generic drug makers to sue brand counterparts.
Gottlieb also said that the Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy (REMS) program, which allows the FDA to require drug makers to prove that a drug’s benefits outweigh its risks, was being manipulated by the pharmaceutical industry and used to slow the introduction of generic competition. He said the FDA was evaluating whether to waive REMS requirements more easily than the agency has in the past.
Bloomberg notes that drug companies with older and competition-prone medications, more than firms with newer drugs, will have more to fear from faster generic approvals and changes made to the legal and regulatory tactics that are used to extend a drug’s sale period. Companies that rely on biologics—which are among the bestsellers worldwide but that have faced little or no generic competition in the United States—will also be more concerned with such changes. If biosimilar approvals speed up, the biggest losers may be specialty pharma, which tend to have older products and smaller markets.
A spokesman for the pharmaceutical industry group Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America said the group is committed to working with the Trump administration and Congress on market-based reforms that would encourage generic competition and promote biopharmaceutical innovation.
President Trump’s 2018 budget proposal for the FDA seeks a last-minute renegotiation of user fees to make up for an approximate 30% decrease in the FDA’s budget. The President’s call for over $1 billion in new user fees to replace losses from his proposed budget cuts was made even though the House and Senate have already both agreed upon their respective versions of user fee reauthorization legislation that contain the user fees already agreed to by the FDA, the pharmaceutical industry, generic drug and biosimilar makers, and medical device manufacturers.
Senator Lamar Alexander (R-TN) told HHS Secretary Tom Price that it was too late for the Trump administration to have an impact on this year’s user fee reauthorization bills. Industry group representatives including BIO and AdvaMed told Senate officials that a failure to act on the already agreed-upon reauthorizations would be devastating.
Review Calls for Path to Global Harmonization of Biosimilar Development Regulations
March 17th 2025Global biosimilar regulatory harmonization will be needed to reduce development costs and improve patient access, despite challenges posed by differing national requirements and regulatory frameworks, according to review authors.
Will the FTC Be More PBM-Friendly Under a Second Trump Administration?
February 23rd 2025On this episode of Not So Different, we explore the Federal Trade Commission’s (FTC) second interim report on pharmacy benefit managers (PBMs) with Joe Wisniewski from Turquoise Health, discussing key issues like preferential reimbursement, drug pricing transparency, biosimilars, shifting regulations, and how a second Trump administration could reshape PBM practices.
From Amjevita to Zarxio: A Decade of US Biosimilar Approvals
March 6th 2025Since the FDA’s groundbreaking approval of Zarxio in 2015, the US biosimilars market has surged to 67 approvals across 18 originators—though the journey has been anything but smooth, with adoption facing hurdles along the way.
A New Chapter: How 2023 Will Shape the US Biosimilar Space for 2024 and Beyond
December 31st 2023On this episode of Not So Different, Cencora's Brian Biehn and Corey Ford take a look back at major policy and regulatory advancements in 2023 and how these changes will alter the space going forward.
Biosimilar Approvals Streamlined With Advanced Statistics Amidst Differing Regulatory Requirements
February 25th 2025The FDA and European Medicines Agency (EMA) mandate high similarity between biosimilars and reference products, but their regulatory processes differ, especially with multiple reference products.