The FDA has issued an update to its guidance on requiring switching study data for biosimilars to be granted interchangeability, citing new science that shows these studies aren’t needed to establish biosimilar safety.
The FDA issued draft its guidance on requiring switching study data to approve a biosimilar with interchangeability, citing new science that suggests that these data are not needed to establish the safety of switching to or from a biosimilar to another product of the same molecule.1
“Since publication of the Interchangeability Guidance, experience has shown that for the products approved as biosimilars to date, the risk in terms of safety or diminished efficacy is insignificant following single or multiple switches between a reference product and a biosimilar product. Accordingly, FDA’s scientific approach to when a switching study or studies may be needed to support a demonstration of interchangeability has evolved,” the FDA wrote in the update.
The draft guidance comes after many experts have issued calls to remove switching study requirements for interchangeability, more reviews showing that switching from a reference agents to a biosimilar2 or from one biosimilar to another3 is safe, and arguments over whether interchangeability designations foster confusion for patients and providers.4 There have also been calls to remove interchangeability labels entirely5 because the US is the only country that uses them and some politicians have introduced legislation to remove switching study requirements.6
Interchangeability labels allow for a biosimilar to be exchanged for a reference product at the pharmacy level without the pharmacists having to obtain permission from the prescriber, making it easier and less time-consuming for patients to get their medications. However, of the 13 approved biosimilars7 that have been deemed interchangeable, 6 were approved without switching data (n = 2 ranibizumab, 2 insulin glargine, 2 aflibercept), either because they are administered intravitreally8 or because the FDA has waived the requirement for insulin biosimilars.9 Additionally, 4 of these products are only available through the medical benefit, meaning that the label is not being used for its intended purpose.
Switching studies in general can be a big expenditure for companies as interchangeability is often seen as providing companies a leg up against their competitors by enticing payers and pharmacy benefit managers to add their products to formularies and by acting as an extra seal of approval from the FDA.
The new draft guidance states that companies wishing to have a biologics license application (BLA) for a biosimilar reviewed for interchangeability status have the option to submit switching study data or a statement expressing why the data in their current package already demonstrates switching safety. Specifically, the statement should include, "any other information the applicant considers relevant to support a showing that the risk, in terms of safety and diminished efficacy, from alternating or switching between the reference product and the proposed interchangeable product is not greater than the risk of using the reference product without such 116 alternation or switch."
Companies with pending BLAs can also submit an amendment to their application featuring the aforementioned information.
In a statement from FDA, Sarah Yim, MD, director of the Office of Therapeutic Biologics and Biosimilars commented, “The recommendations in today’s draft guidance, when finalized, will provide clarity and transparency about the FDA’s thinking and align the review and approval process with existing and emerging science. We have gained valuable experience reviewing both biosimilar and interchangeable biosimilar medications over the last 10 years. Both biosimilars and interchangeable biosimilars meet the same high standard of biosimilarity for FDA approval and both are as safe and effective as the reference product.”9
With the publication of the draft guidance, the FDA said that it is looking to take comments on a revised approach where such studies will not be needed entirely. Those wishing to submit an online or written comment can do so through September 20, 2024.
References
1. FDA. Considerations in demonstrating interchangeability with a reference product: Update. Updated June 20, 2024. Accessed June 20, 2024. https://www.fda.gov/regulatory-information/search-fda-guidance-documents/considerations-demonstrating-interchangeability-reference-product-update
2. Ferreri D. Analyzing safety of switching from originators to biosimilars: A meta-analysis of 21 trials. The Center for Biosimilars®. February 10, 2024. Accessed June 20, 2024. https://www.centerforbiosimilars.com/view/analyzing-safety-of-switching-from-originators-to-biosimilars-a-meta-analysis-of-21-trials
3. Jeremias S. New evidence confirms safe biosimilar-to-biosimilar switching. The Center for Biosimilars. May 28, 2024. Accessed June 20, 2024. https://www.centerforbiosimilars.com/view/new-evidence-confirms-safe-biosimilar-to-biosimilar-switching
4. Wollett G. Confusion persists around the interchangeability designation for biosimilars. The Center for Biosimilars. November 23, 2023. Accessed June 20, 2024. https://www.centerforbiosimilars.com/view/confusion-persists-around-the-interchangeability-designation-for-biosimilars
5. Jeremias S. Webinar addresses solutions to improve adalimumab biosimilar uptake. The Center for Biosimilars. March 18, 2024. Accessed June 20, 2024. https://www.centerforbiosimilars.com/view/webinar-addresses-solutions-to-improve-adalimumab-biosimilar-uptake
6. Jeremias S. Senator reintroduces Biosimilar Red Tape Elimination Act. The Center for Biosimilars. July 14, 2023. Access June 20, 2024. https://www.centerforbiosimilars.com/view/senator-reintroduces-biosimilar-red-tape-elimination-act
7. The Center for Biosimilars biosimilar approvals. The Center for Biosimilars. Updated March 22, 2024. Accessed June 20, 2024. https://www.centerforbiosimilars.com/biosimilar-approvals
8. Jeremias S. Seeing Eye to Eye: FDA's Dr Sarah Yim discusses efforts to increase confidence in ophthalmology biosimilars. The Center for Biosimilars. January 29, 2023. Accessed June 20, 2024. https://www.centerforbiosimilars.com/view/seeing-eye-to-eye-fda-s-dr-sarah-yim-discusses-efforts-to-increase-confidence-in-ophthalmology-biosimilars
9. FDA updates guidance on interchangeability. News release. FDA; June 20, 2024. Accessed June 20, 2024.
Biosimilars Gastroenterology Roundup for November 2024—Podcast Edition
December 1st 2024On this episode of Not So Different, we discuss market changes in the adalimumab space; calls for PBM transparency and biosimilar access reforms grew; new data for biosimilars in gastroenterology conditions; and all the takeaways from this year's Global Biosimilars Week.
Health Canada Approves First Omalizumab Biosimilar
December 16th 2024Health Canada has approved Omlyclo, the first omalizumab biosimilar in Canada, for the treatment of chronic idiopathic urticaria, allergic asthma, and chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps, based on a phase 3 study confirming its bioequivalence to the reference product.
Biosimilars Policy Roundup for September 2024—Podcast Edition
October 6th 2024On this episode of Not So Different, we discuss the FDA's approval of a new biosimilar for treating retinal conditions, which took place in September 2024 alongside other major industry developments, including ongoing legal disputes and broader trends in market dynamics and regulatory challenges.
Review Confirms Clinical Safety of Sandoz Denosumab Biosimilar vs Originator
December 11th 2024Sandoz's biosimilar denosumab (Jubbonti/Wyost) has demonstrated analytical, pharmacokinetic, pharmacodynamic, and clinical equivalence to reference denosumab (Prolia/Xgeva), supporting its approval and extrapolation to all approved indications.
BioRationality: Withdrawal of Proposed Terminal Disclaimer Rule Spells Major Setback for Biosimilars
December 10th 2024The United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO)’s withdrawal of its proposed terminal disclaimer rule is seen as a setback for biosimilar developers, as it preserves patent prosecution practices that favor originator companies and increases costs for biosimilar competition, according to Sarfaraz K. Niazi, PhD.