Was waiting the worst part?
On December 29, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) finalized long-awaited biosimilar guidance from 2014 on the needed clinical pharmacology data from pharmaceutical sponsors.
“Clinical pharmacology studies are part of a stepwise approach for developing the data and information needed to support a demonstration of biosimilarity,” said the FDA. “These studies can reduce the residual uncertainty in assessing the biosimilarity between a proposed biosimilar product and reference product and inform the design of subsequent clinical trials to assess clinically meaningful differences.”
The Biologics Price Competition and Innovation Act of 2009 (BPCIA) created the original approval pathway for follow-on biologics, and guidance on interchangeability is expected this year, containing recommendations on how clinical pharmacology studies that assess the presence or absence of clinically meaningful differences between the proposed biosimilar and the reference product should be conducted and analyzed.
There are four areas upon which the new guidance focuses:
It has been a long 20 months for drug manufacturers who have been awaiting the update to the original draft version, and had taken issue with the FDA's four possible outcomes and terminology for the analytical comparison of the reference product and proposed biosimilar drug.
How AI Can Help Address Cost-Related Nonadherence to Biologic, Biosimilar Treatment
March 9th 2025Despite saving billions, biosimilars still account for only a small share of the biologics market—what's standing in the way of broader adoption and how can artificial intelligence (AI) help change that?
How State Substitution Laws Shape Insulin Biosimilar Adoption
April 15th 2025States with fewer restrictions on biosimilar substitution tend to see higher uptake of interchangeable insulin glargine, showing how even small policy details can significantly influence biosimilar adoption and expand access to more affordable insulin.
Will the FTC Be More PBM-Friendly Under a Second Trump Administration?
February 23rd 2025On this episode of Not So Different, we explore the Federal Trade Commission’s (FTC) second interim report on pharmacy benefit managers (PBMs) with Joe Wisniewski from Turquoise Health, discussing key issues like preferential reimbursement, drug pricing transparency, biosimilars, shifting regulations, and how a second Trump administration could reshape PBM practices.
Experts Pressure Congress to Remove Roadblocks for Biosimilars
April 12th 2025Lawmakers and expert witnesses emphasized the potential of biosimilars to lower health care costs by overcoming barriers like pharmacy benefit manager practices, limited awareness, and regulatory delays to improve access and competition in chronic disease management during a recent congressional hearing.