The FDA has finalized its guidance on labeling of biosimilar products, and FDA Commissioner Scott Gottlieb, MD, called the finalized guidance "one of a suite of deliverables" that will be unveiled as part of the Biosimilars Action Plan.
The FDA has finalized its guidance on labeling of biosimilar products. The guidance pertains to prescribing information, but it does not provide specific recommendations on labeling interchangeable biosimilars.
In the guidance, the agency reiterated its position that a finding of safety and effectiveness for the reference product can be relied upon to give healthcare providers the information they need to make prescribing positions. As such, biosimilars should include relevant data (which will depend on the indication of use, dosing regimen, and conditions of use) from the reference product in their labeling. However, the guidance states that the labeling should not include a description of data from clinical studies used to support biosimilarity, as such studies are not designed to demonstrate safety or effectiveness and their inclusion could be misinterpreted in the context of a drug label.
While the biosimilar’s label should be based on that of the reference product, the guidance indicates that the text of the labels does not have to be identical; by law, a biosimilar’s label must meet the requirements of the physician labeling rule and the pregnancy and lactation labeling final rule, while the reference product may not have been bound by those rules at the time of its approval. Additionally, a biosimilar’s label may have additional information specific to the product (such as administration or storage information) that does not apply to the reference. Labeling for the biosimilar should be specific to the conditions of use in order to help ensure safe use.
In terms of identifying the biosimilar in the label, the guidance recommends that the biosimilar’s proprietary name be used in text that is specific to the product itself, such as indications and usage, dosage and administration, description, and handling information. If the biosimilar has no proprietary name, or if a reference is made to the drug substance in general, the product name (the drug name plus its 4-letter suffix) should be employed instead. The proprietary name can also be used in directives and recommendations, such as boxed warnings, contraindications, warnings and precautions, and drug interactions.
The reference product should be identified as the drug name plus its 4-letter suffix, typically in sections related to adverse events and clinical studies. In text related to the overall risk/benefit profile of the therapy—whether reference or biosimilar—the drug name, without the suffixes of the individual products, should be used. The FDA stresses that multiple approaches to naming may be used, and that appropriateness of product identification is the key consideration.
The FDA also recommends including a statement on the nature of biosimilarity, as well as a statement highlighting the importance of immunogenicity prior to the inclusion of immunogenicity data based on the reference product’s label.
Finally, in cases in which medication guides with instructions for use are necessary, the instructions may differ from the reference products’ only where needed to describe the biosimilar product accurately.
On Twitter, FDA Commissioner Scott Gottlieb, MD, called the finalized guidance “one of a suite of deliverables we’ll be announcing later today when we unveil our Biosimilars Action Plan” in a speech that will take place at the Brookings Institute on July 18 at 1:30 pm.
President Trump Signs Executive Order to Bring Down Drug Prices
April 16th 2025To help bring down sky-high drug prices, President Donald Trump signed an executive order pushing for faster biosimilar development, more transparency, and tougher rules on pharmacy benefit managers—aiming to save billions and make meds more affordable for everyone.
Will the FTC Be More PBM-Friendly Under a Second Trump Administration?
February 23rd 2025On this episode of Not So Different, we explore the Federal Trade Commission’s (FTC) second interim report on pharmacy benefit managers (PBMs) with Joe Wisniewski from Turquoise Health, discussing key issues like preferential reimbursement, drug pricing transparency, biosimilars, shifting regulations, and how a second Trump administration could reshape PBM practices.
Experts Pressure Congress to Remove Roadblocks for Biosimilars
April 12th 2025Lawmakers and expert witnesses emphasized the potential of biosimilars to lower health care costs by overcoming barriers like pharmacy benefit manager practices, limited awareness, and regulatory delays to improve access and competition in chronic disease management during a recent congressional hearing.
A New Chapter: How 2023 Will Shape the US Biosimilar Space for 2024 and Beyond
December 31st 2023On this episode of Not So Different, Cencora's Brian Biehn and Corey Ford take a look back at major policy and regulatory advancements in 2023 and how these changes will alter the space going forward.
Review Calls for Path to Global Harmonization of Biosimilar Development Regulations
March 17th 2025Global biosimilar regulatory harmonization will be needed to reduce development costs and improve patient access, despite challenges posed by differing national requirements and regulatory frameworks, according to review authors.