The FDA has released new draft guidance for industry on refuse-to-file (RTF) action taken by the FDA. The document seeks to clarify circumstances under which the FDA’s Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER) may refuse to file a new drug application (NDA), supplemental NDA, or a Biologics License Application (BLA), or supplemental BLA for a product regulated by CDER.
The FDA has released new draft guidance for industry on refuse-to-file (RTF) action taken by the FDA. The document seeks to clarify circumstances under which the FDA’s Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER) may refuse to file a new drug application (NDA), supplemental NDA, or a Biologics License Application (BLA), or supplemental BLA for a product regulated by CDER. The guidance highlights the importance of submitting a complete application to minimize the chance of an RTF action.
The FDA typically either files an NDA or BLA within 60 days of receipt or informs the applicant of an RTF action. The filing of an application signals that the agency has made a threshold determination that the application’s content is sufficiently complete to permit a thorough review of its merits.
FDA regulations describe the possibility that the agency will consider an application incomplete if it is obviously deficient in a way that will make a review impossible, but the agency acknowledges in its new draft guidance that the administrative threshold to determine completeness has increased in recent years. The guidance points to pre-submission meetings between applicants and the FDA as opportunities to reach agreements regarding the content of a complete application, as well as agreement on submission of minor components that may be submitted within a 30-day period after the original application is submitted (though a rolling review period is available for fast-track designations). These additional submissions can add to the complexity of determining an application’s completeness. However, timely reviews of applications—provided for under user fee act agreements—make it imperative that the agency exercise its RTF authority when necessary to optimize the applicant’s and the FDA’s time and resources.
The types of application deficiencies that may result in an RTF action by day 60 are as follows:
Within 30 days after an RTF notification, an applicant can request an informal conference with the FDA to discuss whether the agency should file an application despite the RTF action.
President Trump Signs Executive Order to Bring Down Drug Prices
April 16th 2025To help bring down sky-high drug prices, President Donald Trump signed an executive order pushing for faster biosimilar development, more transparency, and tougher rules on pharmacy benefit managers—aiming to save billions and make meds more affordable for everyone.
Will the FTC Be More PBM-Friendly Under a Second Trump Administration?
February 23rd 2025On this episode of Not So Different, we explore the Federal Trade Commission’s (FTC) second interim report on pharmacy benefit managers (PBMs) with Joe Wisniewski from Turquoise Health, discussing key issues like preferential reimbursement, drug pricing transparency, biosimilars, shifting regulations, and how a second Trump administration could reshape PBM practices.
Experts Pressure Congress to Remove Roadblocks for Biosimilars
April 12th 2025Lawmakers and expert witnesses emphasized the potential of biosimilars to lower health care costs by overcoming barriers like pharmacy benefit manager practices, limited awareness, and regulatory delays to improve access and competition in chronic disease management during a recent congressional hearing.
A New Chapter: How 2023 Will Shape the US Biosimilar Space for 2024 and Beyond
December 31st 2023On this episode of Not So Different, Cencora's Brian Biehn and Corey Ford take a look back at major policy and regulatory advancements in 2023 and how these changes will alter the space going forward.
Review Calls for Path to Global Harmonization of Biosimilar Development Regulations
March 17th 2025Global biosimilar regulatory harmonization will be needed to reduce development costs and improve patient access, despite challenges posed by differing national requirements and regulatory frameworks, according to review authors.