Last week, Amgen and Allergan announced that the FDA will review data supporting the firms' Biologics License Application for ABP 215, a bevacizumab (Avastin) biosimilar candidate.
Last week, Amgen and Allergan announced that the FDA will review data supporting the firms’ Biologics License Application for ABP 215, a bevacizumab (Avastin) biosimilar candidate.
The FDA Advisory Committee will review the analytical, pharmacokinetic, and clinical data from studies on ABP 215, including the results of a phase 3 study that met its primary endpoint of demonstrating clinical equivalence to the reference product in patients undergoing treatment for non-squamous, non-small cell lung cancer. The study also demonstrated comparable safety and immunogenicity profiles for ABP 215 and the reference bevacizumab.
While Amgen and Allergan have said that they believe their product to be the first bevacizumab biosimilar submitted for consideration in the United States, the reference product’s manufacturer, Roche, sees competition brewing in Europe—the European Medicines Agency has confirmed that it is currently considering 2 applications for bevacizumab biosimilars.
Roche, in attempting to retain its hold on the $6.8 billion bevacizumab market, has asserted that its patent protection for bevacizumab extends until 2019. The firm filed a complaint in the US courts in response to Amgen and Allergan’s application, and seeks to bar the biosimilar product from the US market until the patent dispute has been resolved.
Roche’s argument hinges upon the so-called “patent dance” requirements as laid out in the Biologics Price Competition and Innovation Act. However, after this week’s Supreme Court ruling in Sandoz v Amgen, which held that the “patent dance” is optional, Roche may be forced to change its litigation approach.
Can Global Policies to Boost Biosimilar Adoption Work in the US?
November 17th 2024On this special episode of Not So Different honoring Global Biosimilars Week, Craig Burton, executive director of the Biosimilars Council, explores how global policies—from incentives to health equity strategies—could boost biosimilar adoption in the US.
A New Chapter: How 2023 Will Shape the US Biosimilar Space for 2024 and Beyond
December 31st 2023On this episode of Not So Different, Cencora's Brian Biehn and Corey Ford take a look back at major policy and regulatory advancements in 2023 and how these changes will alter the space going forward.
Enhancing Adoption of Infused Biosimilars for a Sustainable Future
October 30th 2024An IQVIA report highlights challenges to the sustainability of infused biosimilars in the US, citing rebate walls and reimbursement policies, and proposes key solutions to enhance adoption and benefits for all stakeholders.
The Subcutaneous Revolution: Zymfentra and the Future of IBD Care With Dr Andres Yarur
December 17th 2023On this episode of Not So Different, Andres Yarur, MD, a researcher and associate professor of medicine at Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, discusses the significance of the FDA approval for Zymfentra, the world's first subcutaneous infliximab product, for patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD).
FDA and Industry Experts Unpack Biosimilar Device Requirements
October 23rd 2024At the GRx+Biosims 2024 conference, a panel of industry experts and FDA officials discussed evolving device requirements for biosimilars and interchangeable biosimilars, highlighting new approaches to comparative use human factors studies, regulatory challenges, and alternative validation methods.
Calling for Unified Biosimilar Standards, Stronger Education at GRx+Biosims
October 23rd 2024At the GRx+Biosims conference, a fireside chat highlighted the need to streamline biosimilar development and strengthen industry collaboration, with Sarah Yim, MD, of the FDA, emphasizing education's key role in building trust and adoption.