In yesterday’s decision, the panel agreed with the district court that, during prosecution of the patent, Amgen “clearly and unmistakably surrendered salt combinations other than the particular combinations recited in the claims,” and that prosecution history estoppel bars Amgen from succeeding on its infringement claims under the doctrine of equivalents.
Yesterday, Amgen lost its fight to block Coherus BioSciences from selling its biosimilar pegfilgrastim, Udenyca, referencing Amgen’s innovator drug, Neulasta. A 3-judge panel of the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit affirmed a decision that, in 2018, dismissed Amgen’s case.
Amgen holds a patent, US patent 8,273,707, on methods of purifying proteins in which specific salts are used in a loading solution. When Coherus filed an abbreviated Biologics License Application (aBLA) for its biosimilar pegfilgrastim, the aBLA revealed that Coherus’ manufacturing process contained steps to purify pegfilgrastim.
One such step involved use of a salt combination in a chromatography buffer, though this combination was not among the specific combinations described in Amgen’s patent. However, Amgen sued Coherus for infringing on its patent under the doctrine of equivalents, a means by which a patent holder can claim infringement even if not all of the elements of the patented invention are identical in the allegedly infringing process.
Coherus moved to dismiss Amgen’s complaint, and a magistrate judge recommended that Coherus’ motion be granted. The district court adopted the magistrate judge’s report and granted Coherus’ motion to dismiss.
In yesterday’s decision, the panel agreed with the district court that, during prosecution of the patent, Amgen “clearly and unmistakably surrendered salt combinations other than the particular combinations recited in the claims,” and that prosecution history estoppel bars Amgen from succeeding on its infringement claims under the doctrine of equivalents.
Thus, according to the decision, “the district court did not err” in its ruling, and the panel affirmed the district court’s decision.
Thomas Fitzpatrick, JD, Coherus’ chief legal officer, said in a statement that “We are pleased by the Federal Circuit’s precedential decision and have always been confident that the District Court’s decision would be affirmed on appeal.” He added, “We are particularly pleased to continue our mission to successfully lower healthcare costs and expand patients’ access to life-saving drugs.”
Coherus launched its pegfilgrastim biosimilar in the United States in January 2019 and recently marked the 6-month anniversary of the product’s launch by revealing that the company has produced more than 400,000 prefilled syringes of the product to date, and by saying that its preliminary unaudited net sales for the product in the last quarter are estimated to be between $79 million and $84 million.
President Trump Signs Executive Order to Bring Down Drug Prices
April 16th 2025To help bring down sky-high drug prices, President Donald Trump signed an executive order pushing for faster biosimilar development, more transparency, and tougher rules on pharmacy benefit managers—aiming to save billions and make meds more affordable for everyone.
How AI Can Help Address Cost-Related Nonadherence to Biologic, Biosimilar Treatment
March 9th 2025Despite saving billions, biosimilars still account for only a small share of the biologics market—what's standing in the way of broader adoption and how can artificial intelligence (AI) help change that?
Will the FTC Be More PBM-Friendly Under a Second Trump Administration?
February 23rd 2025On this episode of Not So Different, we explore the Federal Trade Commission’s (FTC) second interim report on pharmacy benefit managers (PBMs) with Joe Wisniewski from Turquoise Health, discussing key issues like preferential reimbursement, drug pricing transparency, biosimilars, shifting regulations, and how a second Trump administration could reshape PBM practices.
Risk-Adjusted NPV Framework for Biosimilars Shows Key Investment Drivers
April 7th 2025Early market entry, manufacturing efficiency, and market share are critical to biosimilar development success, while technical complexity and competition heavily impact returns, according to a study presenting a risk-adjusted net present value (NPV) analysis framework.