When used as a primary prophylaxis, biosimilar filgrastim (Zarxio) was found to be cost-effective when used to treat patients with nonmetastatic non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), according to a study presented at ASCO20 Virtual, the annual meeting of the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO).
For patients with nonmetastatic non—small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who are at intermediate-risk of developing febrile neutropenia (FN), biosimilar filgrastim (Zarxio) is cost-effective when used as a primary prophylaxis (PP) when a payer’s willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold is $50,000 per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gained, according to a new study.
Findings were presented at ASCO20 Virtual, the annual meeting of the American Society of Clinical Oncology. Patients with nonmetastatic NSCLC are at intermediate risk (10%-20%) of developing FN if they are receiving platinum-based chemotherapy.
Authors said most patients with NSCLC who receive chemotherapy have ≥1 FN risk factors, and although PP can reduce the incidence of FN, it is more costly than secondary prophylaxis (SP).
The study used a Markov statistical model to evaluate PP versus SP to prevent chemotherapy-induced FN in patients 61 years of age receiving adjuvant carboplatin/paclitaxel every 3 weeks for 4 cycles.
Investigators conducted separate analyses for patients with 0 FN risk factors and ≥1 FN risk factors, representing 11.3% and 18% baseline FN risk, respectively. They calculated incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) for cost per FN event avoided, life-year saved (LYS), and QALY gained from a United States payer perspective.
Cost-Effectiveness for Patients
Use of filgrastim as PP versus SP provided an additional 0.056 QALYs (0.079 LYS) for patients with 0 risk factors, at an incremental cost of $3266. For cost per FN event avoided, cost per LYS, and cost per QALY gained, the ICERs were $46,815, $41,555, and $58,531, respectively.
For patients with 1 or more risk factors for FN, PP versus SP added 0.090 QALYs (0.127 LYS) at an incremental cost of $1605. For cost per FN event avoided, cost per LYS, and cost per QALY gained, the ICERs were $13,970, $12,644, and $17,805, respectively.
Investigators also conducted deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses, finding that the likelihood of cost-effectiveness at a WTP threshold of $50,000 per QALY gained was 31.7% for patients with 0 risk factors for FN and 96.6% for those with at least 1 FN risk factor.
Reference
Li EC, Mezzio D, Spargo K, Campbell KJ, Lyman GH. Cost-effectiveness of filgrastim-sndz as primary prophylaxis (PP) versus secondary prophylaxis (SP) to prevent chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia (FN) in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients at intermediate risk. Presented at ASCO20 Virtual; May 30-31, 2020. Abstract e19401
Similar Survival, Safety for Bevacizumab Biosimilar vs Originator in Colorectal Cancer
February 8th 2025A retrospective observational study found no significant differences in progression-free survival or safety in patients with colorectal cancers in Japan treated with ABP 215, Amgen’s bevacizumab biosimilar, or reference bevacizumab (Avastin), and estimated cost savings of 800,000 Japanese yen (approximately $5100) per patient with the biosimilar.
Biosimilars Oncology Roundup for June 2024—Podcast Edition
July 7th 2024On this episode of Not So Different, we review biosimilar news coming out of June, with clinical trial results from conferences and a study showcasing how to overcome economic and noneconomic barriers to oncology biosimilars.
The Biosimilar Void: 90% of Biologics Coming Off Patent Will Lack Biosimilars
February 5th 2025Of the 118 biologics losing exclusivity over the next decade, only 10% have biosimilars in development, meaning a vast majority of biologics have no pipeline, which limits savings potential for the health care system.
Insights from Festival of Biologics: Dracey Poore Discusses Cardinal Health’s 2024 Biosimilar Report
May 19th 2024The discussion highlights key emerging trends from the Festival of Biologics conference and the annual Cardinal Health Biosimilars Report, including the importance of sustainability in the health care landscape and the challenges and successes in biosimilar adoption and affordability.
Biosimilars Drive Cost Savings and Achieve 53% Market Share Across Treatment Areas
January 16th 2025Biosimilar launches achieve a 53% market share and a 53% reduction in average drug costs after 5 years of biosimilar competition, according to Samsung Bioepis’ most recent market report, showcasing notable pricing trends and market share disparities across therapeutic areas.
The Next Frontier: Oncology Biosimilars in 2025 and Beyond
January 13th 2025The US oncology biosimilar market has rapidly evolved since its launch in 2017, driven by steep price discounts, payer adoption, and provider confidence, with an upcoming wave of biosimilars targeting blockbuster biologics promising further market growth, cost savings, and broader patient access.