Although 2021 marks the centenary of insulin's discovery, insulin access remains a global health issue.
Insulin aspart, lispro, and glargine biosimilar candidates referencing NovoRapid, Humalog, and Lantus demonstrated bioequivalence in trial data presented at the Scientific Sessions of the American Diabetes Association.
Gan & Lee Pharmaceuticals said positive phase 1 clinical results were achieved for 3 insulin analog biosimilar candidates: insulin aspart (GL-ASP), insulin lispro (GL-LIS), and insulin glargine (GL-GLA), referencing NovoRapid, Humalog, and Lantus, respectively.
Although 2021 marks the centenary of insulin's discovery, insulin access remains a global health issue.
The results were presented at Scientific Sessions of the American Diabetes Association, held June 25-29, 2021. The company said all 3 studies met their primary pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic (PD) end points.
“These data demonstrate PK and PD bioequivalence between each of the proposed biosimilar Gan & Lee insulins and their respective reference compounds. In addition, the safety profiles were comparable,” according to a company statement.
Currently, there are no insulin biosimilars available in the United States, although the second half of 2021 is expected to produce at least 2 approvals.
Proposed Insulin Aspart Biosimilar
The trial of GL-ASP enrolled 36 health male volunteers who each received a single dose of either the biosimilar candidate or the US or EU versions of NovoRapid (rapid acting) in each of the 3 euglycemic glucose “clamp” periods. The clamp technique maintains blood glucose concentrations at predefined target levels to allow assessments of insulin action.
Investigators said the aspart concentration and glucose infusion rate profiles between products were “superimposable” in terms of comparability. PK biosimilarity was demonstrated in terms of serum aspart concentration, and primary PD end points and sensitivity analyses also demonstrated equivalence.
They said adverse events (AEs) were rare with just 7 to 14 AEs per insulin and just 1 injection site reaction with GL-ASP (mild erythema).
Proposed Insulin Lispro Biosimilar
A randomized, double-blind crossover trial compared PK and PD properties of GL-LIS with the US and EU versions of Humalog, a fast-acting insulin, in 38 healthy male volunteers.
Investigators said each participant received a single 0.2 U/kg dose of 1 the 3 formulations in each of the 3 euglycemic glucose clamp periods. Serum lispro concentration and glucose infusion rate profiles were “superimposable, demonstrating biosimilarity, they said.
Serum lispro concentration point estimates were close to 100% between the biosimilar candidate and the reference versions, and the 90% CIs were within predefined similarity margins of 80% to 125%. Primary PD and secondary PK/PD end points met biosimilarity criteria, as did sensitivity analyses.
Investigators reported a low incidence of AEs (5-11 AEs per insulin). There were no injection site reactions.
Proposed Insulin Glargine Biosimilar
A randomized, double-blind crossover trial of GL-GLA vs the US and EU versions of Lantus (glargine, long acting) was conducted in 114 healthy male volunteers with type 1 diabetes. Participants received a single dose (0.5 U/kg) of GL-GLA or the US or EU versions of Lantus in each of the 3 euglycemic glucose clamp periods.
Investigators said the PK and glucose infusion rates were “superimposable,” point estimates for measured metabolite M1 were close to 100%, and the 90% CIs were well within the predefined similarity margins of 80% to 125%.
They said the primary and secondary PK/PD end points were met and all insulins were well tolerated with matching AE rates of 19%, 26% and 21% for GL-GLA, and the US and EU formulations of Lantus, respectively. There were few injection site reactions per insulin.
Boosting Health Care Sustainability: The Role of Biosimilars in Latin America
November 21st 2024Biosimilars could improve access to biologic treatments and health care sustainability in Latin America, but their adoption is hindered by misconceptions, regulatory gaps, and weak pharmacovigilance, requiring targeted education and stronger regulations.
Biosimilars Development Roundup for October 2024—Podcast Edition
November 3rd 2024On this episode of Not So Different, we discuss the GRx+Biosims conference, which included discussions on data transparency, artificial intelligence (AI), and collaboration to enhance the global supply chain for biosimilars and generic drugs, as well as the evolving requirements for biosimilar devices.
Eye on Pharma: EU Aflibercept Approvals; Biosimilars Canada Campaign; Celltrion Data
November 19th 2024The European Commission grants marketing authorization to 2 aflibercept biosimilars; Biosimilars Canada launches new campaign to provide sustainable solutions to employers; Celltrion shares positive data for 2 biosimilars.
Biosimilars Policy Roundup for September 2024—Podcast Edition
October 6th 2024On this episode of Not So Different, we discuss the FDA's approval of a new biosimilar for treating retinal conditions, which took place in September 2024 alongside other major industry developments, including ongoing legal disputes and broader trends in market dynamics and regulatory challenges.
Can Global Policies to Boost Biosimilar Adoption Work in the US?
November 17th 2024On this special episode of Not So Different honoring Global Biosimilars Week, Craig Burton, executive director of the Biosimilars Council, explores how global policies—from incentives to health equity strategies—could boost biosimilar adoption in the US.
Breaking Down Biosimilar Barriers: Interchangeability
November 14th 2024Part 3 of this series for Global Biosimilars Week, penned by Dracey Poore, director of biosimilars at Cardinal Health, explores the critical topic of interchangeability, examining its role in shaping biosimilar adoption and the broader implications for accessibility.