Although 2021 marks the centenary of insulin's discovery, insulin access remains a global health issue.
Insulin aspart, lispro, and glargine biosimilar candidates referencing NovoRapid, Humalog, and Lantus demonstrated bioequivalence in trial data presented at the Scientific Sessions of the American Diabetes Association.
Gan & Lee Pharmaceuticals said positive phase 1 clinical results were achieved for 3 insulin analog biosimilar candidates: insulin aspart (GL-ASP), insulin lispro (GL-LIS), and insulin glargine (GL-GLA), referencing NovoRapid, Humalog, and Lantus, respectively.
Although 2021 marks the centenary of insulin's discovery, insulin access remains a global health issue.
The results were presented at Scientific Sessions of the American Diabetes Association, held June 25-29, 2021. The company said all 3 studies met their primary pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic (PD) end points.
“These data demonstrate PK and PD bioequivalence between each of the proposed biosimilar Gan & Lee insulins and their respective reference compounds. In addition, the safety profiles were comparable,” according to a company statement.
Currently, there are no insulin biosimilars available in the United States, although the second half of 2021 is expected to produce at least 2 approvals.
Proposed Insulin Aspart Biosimilar
The trial of GL-ASP enrolled 36 health male volunteers who each received a single dose of either the biosimilar candidate or the US or EU versions of NovoRapid (rapid acting) in each of the 3 euglycemic glucose “clamp” periods. The clamp technique maintains blood glucose concentrations at predefined target levels to allow assessments of insulin action.
Investigators said the aspart concentration and glucose infusion rate profiles between products were “superimposable” in terms of comparability. PK biosimilarity was demonstrated in terms of serum aspart concentration, and primary PD end points and sensitivity analyses also demonstrated equivalence.
They said adverse events (AEs) were rare with just 7 to 14 AEs per insulin and just 1 injection site reaction with GL-ASP (mild erythema).
Proposed Insulin Lispro Biosimilar
A randomized, double-blind crossover trial compared PK and PD properties of GL-LIS with the US and EU versions of Humalog, a fast-acting insulin, in 38 healthy male volunteers.
Investigators said each participant received a single 0.2 U/kg dose of 1 the 3 formulations in each of the 3 euglycemic glucose clamp periods. Serum lispro concentration and glucose infusion rate profiles were “superimposable, demonstrating biosimilarity, they said.
Serum lispro concentration point estimates were close to 100% between the biosimilar candidate and the reference versions, and the 90% CIs were within predefined similarity margins of 80% to 125%. Primary PD and secondary PK/PD end points met biosimilarity criteria, as did sensitivity analyses.
Investigators reported a low incidence of AEs (5-11 AEs per insulin). There were no injection site reactions.
Proposed Insulin Glargine Biosimilar
A randomized, double-blind crossover trial of GL-GLA vs the US and EU versions of Lantus (glargine, long acting) was conducted in 114 healthy male volunteers with type 1 diabetes. Participants received a single dose (0.5 U/kg) of GL-GLA or the US or EU versions of Lantus in each of the 3 euglycemic glucose clamp periods.
Investigators said the PK and glucose infusion rates were “superimposable,” point estimates for measured metabolite M1 were close to 100%, and the 90% CIs were well within the predefined similarity margins of 80% to 125%.
They said the primary and secondary PK/PD end points were met and all insulins were well tolerated with matching AE rates of 19%, 26% and 21% for GL-GLA, and the US and EU formulations of Lantus, respectively. There were few injection site reactions per insulin.
Will the FTC Be More PBM-Friendly Under a Second Trump Administration?
February 23rd 2025On this episode of Not So Different, we explore the Federal Trade Commission’s (FTC) second interim report on pharmacy benefit managers (PBMs) with Joe Wisniewski from Turquoise Health, discussing key issues like preferential reimbursement, drug pricing transparency, biosimilars, shifting regulations, and how a second Trump administration could reshape PBM practices.
From Amjevita to Zarxio: A Decade of US Biosimilar Approvals
March 6th 2025Since the FDA’s groundbreaking approval of Zarxio in 2015, the US biosimilars market has surged to 67 approvals across 18 originators—though the journey has been anything but smooth, with adoption facing hurdles along the way.
Biosimilars Development Roundup for October 2024—Podcast Edition
November 3rd 2024On this episode of Not So Different, we discuss the GRx+Biosims conference, which included discussions on data transparency, artificial intelligence (AI), and collaboration to enhance the global supply chain for biosimilars and generic drugs, as well as the evolving requirements for biosimilar devices.
Biosimilar Approvals Streamlined With Advanced Statistics Amidst Differing Regulatory Requirements
February 25th 2025The FDA and European Medicines Agency (EMA) mandate high similarity between biosimilars and reference products, but their regulatory processes differ, especially with multiple reference products.