Gillian Woollett, MA, DPhil, vice president and head of regulatory strategy and policy at Samsung Bioepis, outlines how concerns over the safety and efficacy of biosimilars has shifted and what new concerns the industry is focusing on.
During an interview from the Festival of Biologics, Gillian Woollett, MA, DPhil, vice president and head of regulatory strategy and policy at Samsung Bioepis, outlines how concerns over the safety and efficacy of biosimilars has shifted and what new concerns the industry is focusing on.
Transcript
How has the conversation surrounding biosimilars evolved since the US introduction of biosimilars in 2015?
Woollett: I think one thing that we saw had been somewhat put to rest in recent discussions is any questions around quality of the biosimilars or any unusual or unexpected adverse events, such that those that are experienced in their use are increasingly comfortable as further biosimilars come along.
But in that sense, it's slightly dependent on therapeutic area because say you've had experience with oncology biosimilars, you're comfortable with future oncology biosimilars. So, I think there was a discussion that the business model is more, perhaps, governed by therapeutic area than it is either a more generic model or a more brand model.
So, I think that was one important point, but it does come down to: the science is the bedrock of everything. That if you're consistent as a regulatory authority, it's important for both the confidence in the biosimilars but also the confidence in the regulators, that they're consistent and science-based.
There's an opportunity for much, much greater regulatory efficiency. And that came up, again, as a global issue, perhaps in part due to some of the experiences from COVID-19 but also a general agreement that the science is worldwide. And if we can show some regulatory efficiency, we can get more competitive products more quickly and more affordably. But also we may keep more competitors in this space. So, that was really important, too.
And then there was amongst some, not amongst everybody, the view that, of course, we need biosimilars to allow room in the health care dollar for the next tranche of innovator products, too. And that affordability across the board is as important as anything else to do with biosimilars insofar as everybody wants the originator biologics coming through. And of course, they're the future reference products for biosimilars. So, there was a little bit more optimism around the sort of virtuous cycle of ideas rather than being solely about specific products and some companies feeling a threat to their portfolios.
BioRationality: Biosimilar Associations and Stakeholders Representing Biosimilars
January 20th 2025Sarfaraz K. Niazi, PhD, dives into the role that biosimilar associations and organizations play in promoting biosimilars as well as how their stakeholder demographic and main objectives differ from one another.
Biosimilars Development Roundup for October 2024—Podcast Edition
November 3rd 2024On this episode of Not So Different, we discuss the GRx+Biosims conference, which included discussions on data transparency, artificial intelligence (AI), and collaboration to enhance the global supply chain for biosimilars and generic drugs, as well as the evolving requirements for biosimilar devices.
Eye on Pharma: Korean Drugmakers’ Impact in Europe; New Denosumab, Eculizumab Deals
January 11th 2025Korean drugmakers hold over 50% market share in the 6 best-selling biosimilar markets, 2 companies sign exclusive licensing partnership for a denosumab biosimilar, and 2 others join forces for an eculizumab biosimilar.
Biosimilars in America: Overcoming Barriers and Maximizing Impact
July 21st 2024Join us as we explore the complexities of the US biosimilars market, discussing legislative influences, payer and provider adoption factors, and strategies to overcome industry challenges with expert insights from Kyle Noonan, PharmD, MS, value & access strategy manager at Cencora.
Study Confirms CT-P42 Therapeutic Equivalence to Reference Aflibercept in DME
January 6th 2025The phase 3 trial showed biosimilar CT-P42 (Celltrion) is therapeutically equivalent to reference aflibercept in improving visual acuity in patients with diabetic macular edema (DME), with comparable efficacy, safety, pharmacokinetics, and immunogenicity at 24 weeks, with more long-term data expected.