Gillian Woollett, MA, DPhil, senior vice president, Avalere Health, discusses how “confirmation of sufficient likeness" should replace “totality of evidence” in biosimilar development.
Transcript
In biologics the whole question, [as] for biosimilars, has been whether they can be defined analytically. We now have the methods to define them sufficiently well that the question becomes, what else do you need? So our confirmation of sufficient lightness is based on the analytics, establishing that indeed, the two products you're comparing—the reference and the biosimilar candidate—are sufficiently alike, and we chose the new terminology so as not to imply a difference. And once you've got the confirmation, sufficient lightness analytically, then what our paper shows—and that'll be referenced—what our paper shows is that the biosimilars worldwide in US, Europe, Australia and Canada, if the PK [pharmacokinetic] matches, that product was going to be approved as biosimilar. So that then becomes the confirmation of sufficient likeness. And what we're asserting in the paper is there's no need for additional clinical studies, because they won't tell you anything. And if a clinical study won't tell you anything, it lacks scientific validity. Therefore, it lacks ethical validity. And it shouldn't be being done, and certainly not routinely.
We also would like to note that our paper, which was published in August [2019] in BioDrugs1, subsequently, the European regulators have published a paper, also in BioDrugs in September2, and they're coming to the same conclusions just based on European data. So we think there's definitely a case to be made here to revisit what you're doing, and therefore a new paradigm is entirely appropriate3 and we just like confirmation of sufficient lightness.
References
1. Webster CJ, Wong AC, Woollett GR. An efficient development paradigm for biosimilar BioDrugs. 2019;(33)603. doi: 10.1007/s40259-019-00371-4.
2. Wolff-Holz E, Tiitso K, Vleminckx C, Weise M. Evolution of the EU biosimilar framework: Past and future. BioDrugs. 2019;(33)621. doi: 10.1007/s40259-019-00377-y.
3. Vulto A. Delivering on the promise of biosimilars. BioDrugs. 2019;(33)599. doi: 10.1007/s40259-019-00388-9.
Can Global Policies to Boost Biosimilar Adoption Work in the US?
November 17th 2024On this special episode of Not So Different honoring Global Biosimilars Week, Craig Burton, executive director of the Biosimilars Council, explores how global policies—from incentives to health equity strategies—could boost biosimilar adoption in the US.
Biosimilars in America: Overcoming Barriers and Maximizing Impact
July 21st 2024Join us as we explore the complexities of the US biosimilars market, discussing legislative influences, payer and provider adoption factors, and strategies to overcome industry challenges with expert insights from Kyle Noonan, PharmD, MS, value & access strategy manager at Cencora.
Q&A: Dr Kimberly Maxfield Explains How BsUFA III Will Advance the US Biosimilar Industry
December 20th 2023At AMCP Nexus, Kimberly Maxfield, PhD, pharmacologist at the FDA, delved into how the third reauthorization of the Biosimilar User Fee Act (BsUFA III) will shape the American biosimilar market and improve development efficiency over the next few years.
Breaking Barriers in Osteoporosis Care: New Denosumab Biosimilars Wyost, Jubbonti Approved
June 16th 2024In this episode, The Center for Biosimilars® delves into the FDA approval of the first denosumab biosimilars, Wyost and Jubbonti (denosumab-bbdz), and discuss their potential to revolutionize osteoporosis treatment with expert insights from 2 rheumatologists.