A new report released Monday by UnitedHealth Group finds that administering specialty drugs—which are typically injected or infused—in homes or in independent physician offices instead of hospitals could save as much as $4 billion each year.
A new report released Monday by UnitedHealth Group finds that administering specialty drugs—which are typically injected or infused—in homes or in independent physician offices instead of hospitals could save as much as $4 billion each year.
The report focused on the 5 conditions—multiple sclerosis (MS), immune deficiency, rheumatoid arthritis (RA), inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), and chemotherapy—that account for more than 75% of spending on administered drugs.
Changing the setting of administration would save $16,000 to $37,000 per privately insured patient per year, the report said, reflecting a savings opportunity between 33% and 52%.
By condition, the report separated monthly costs by place of administration:
For 2 conditions—RA and IBD—costs were slightly higher when drugs were administered at home versus a provider’s office, but both sites were still far less than hospital settings.
For chemotherapy, the report found a $16,000 savings for 4 months of treatment ($8281 monthly costs for a provider’s office and $12,315 for a hospital setting).
The report comes as the use of specialty drugs is increasing; since 2013, annual growth in per capita spending on administered specialty drugs has averaged 14%. With healthcare costs expected to reach $6 trillion by 2027, policymakers have been grappling with different ideas to try to reverse the trends.
The report said that treating patients at home could add to physical and mental wellbeing, with fewer schedule disruptions related to work or family, without the likelihood of adverse drug events or side effects.
Compared to independent physician offices, hospitals charge more for specialty drugs and their administration, whether treatment occurs in a hospital or in a hospital-owned physician practice.
Biosimilars Oncology Roundup for June 2024—Podcast Edition
July 7th 2024On this episode of Not So Different, we review biosimilar news coming out of June, with clinical trial results from conferences and a study showcasing how to overcome economic and noneconomic barriers to oncology biosimilars.
Similar Survival, Safety for Bevacizumab Biosimilar vs Originator in Colorectal Cancer
February 8th 2025A retrospective observational study found no significant differences in progression-free survival or safety in patients with colorectal cancers in Japan treated with ABP 215, Amgen’s bevacizumab biosimilar, or reference bevacizumab (Avastin), and estimated cost savings of 800,000 Japanese yen (approximately $5100) per patient with the biosimilar.
Breaking Barriers in Osteoporosis Care: New Denosumab Biosimilars Wyost, Jubbonti Approved
June 16th 2024In this episode, The Center for Biosimilars® delves into the FDA approval of the first denosumab biosimilars, Wyost and Jubbonti (denosumab-bbdz), and discuss their potential to revolutionize osteoporosis treatment with expert insights from 2 rheumatologists.
The Biosimilar Void: 90% of Biologics Coming Off Patent Will Lack Biosimilars
February 5th 2025Of the 118 biologics losing exclusivity over the next decade, only 10% have biosimilars in development, meaning a vast majority of biologics have no pipeline, which limits savings potential for the health care system.