A new report released Monday by UnitedHealth Group finds that administering specialty drugs—which are typically injected or infused—in homes or in independent physician offices instead of hospitals could save as much as $4 billion each year.
A new report released Monday by UnitedHealth Group finds that administering specialty drugs—which are typically injected or infused—in homes or in independent physician offices instead of hospitals could save as much as $4 billion each year.
The report focused on the 5 conditions—multiple sclerosis (MS), immune deficiency, rheumatoid arthritis (RA), inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), and chemotherapy—that account for more than 75% of spending on administered drugs.
Changing the setting of administration would save $16,000 to $37,000 per privately insured patient per year, the report said, reflecting a savings opportunity between 33% and 52%.
By condition, the report separated monthly costs by place of administration:
For 2 conditions—RA and IBD—costs were slightly higher when drugs were administered at home versus a provider’s office, but both sites were still far less than hospital settings.
For chemotherapy, the report found a $16,000 savings for 4 months of treatment ($8281 monthly costs for a provider’s office and $12,315 for a hospital setting).
The report comes as the use of specialty drugs is increasing; since 2013, annual growth in per capita spending on administered specialty drugs has averaged 14%. With healthcare costs expected to reach $6 trillion by 2027, policymakers have been grappling with different ideas to try to reverse the trends.
The report said that treating patients at home could add to physical and mental wellbeing, with fewer schedule disruptions related to work or family, without the likelihood of adverse drug events or side effects.
Compared to independent physician offices, hospitals charge more for specialty drugs and their administration, whether treatment occurs in a hospital or in a hospital-owned physician practice.
Top 5 Most-Read Oncology Articles of 2024
December 24th 2024The top 5 oncology biosimilar articles in 2024 cover Duke's recommendations for cell and gene therapy biosimilars, FDA approval of Shanghai Henlius Biotech's trastuzumab biosimilar, Boehringer Ingelheim layoffs, the safety of rituximab biosimilar CT-P10, and more.
Biosimilars Oncology Roundup for June 2024—Podcast Edition
July 7th 2024On this episode of Not So Different, we review biosimilar news coming out of June, with clinical trial results from conferences and a study showcasing how to overcome economic and noneconomic barriers to oncology biosimilars.
Breaking Barriers in Osteoporosis Care: New Denosumab Biosimilars Wyost, Jubbonti Approved
June 16th 2024In this episode, The Center for Biosimilars® delves into the FDA approval of the first denosumab biosimilars, Wyost and Jubbonti (denosumab-bbdz), and discuss their potential to revolutionize osteoporosis treatment with expert insights from 2 rheumatologists.
Review Confirms Clinical Safety of Sandoz Denosumab Biosimilar vs Originator
December 11th 2024Sandoz's biosimilar denosumab (Jubbonti/Wyost) has demonstrated analytical, pharmacokinetic, pharmacodynamic, and clinical equivalence to reference denosumab (Prolia/Xgeva), supporting its approval and extrapolation to all approved indications.
Eye on Pharma: Golimumab Biosimilar Update; Korea Approves Denosumab; Xbrane, Intas Collaboration
December 10th 2024Alvotech and Advanz Pharma have submitted a European marketing application for their golimumab biosimilar to treat inflammatory diseases, while Celltrion secured Korean approval for denosumab biosimilars, and Intas Pharmaceuticals partnered with Xbrane Biopharma on a nivolumab biosimilar.