Though the use of biosimilars is becoming more common in the adult arthritis space, there has been little research on their use in pediatric patients. Identifying the need for further analysis in this population, researchers conducted a study investigating biosimilar use in children and young adults with juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA). The results were presented last week at the British Society for Rheumatology’s Annual Conference held in Liverpool, United Kingdom.
Though the use of biosimilars is becoming more common in the adult arthritis space, there has been little research on their use in pediatric patients. Identifying the need for further analysis in this population, researchers conducted a study investigating biosimilar use in children and young adults with juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA). The results were presented last week at the British Society for Rheumatology’s Annual Conference held in Liverpool, United Kingdom.
Researchers launched the prospective study, Biologics for Children with Rheumatic Diseases (BCRD), in 2010, and it is currently ongoing. The study investigated children with JIA who were beginning biologic therapies.
The study investigated the use of 2 biosimilar infliximab brands (sold as Inflectra and Remsima, which are the same molecular entity) and biosimilar etanercept (sold as Benepali) available in the United Kingdom. Baseline data for the study were collected through questionnaires completed by the treating physician or clinical research nurse. Follow-up data collection, including measurement of disease activity scores and changes in drug therapy, took place at 6 months, 1 year, and then yearly thereafter.
From 2010 to 2017, 26 patients identified in the BCRD study were being treated with a biosimilar: 21 (81%) were treated with Remsima, 3 (12%) were treated with Inflectra, and 2 (8%) were treated with Benepali. Of these, 9 (35%) started a biosimilar as their first biologic therapy. One patient switched from originator infliximab to Remsima. Sixteen (62%) switched from a different biologic therapy.
Reasons for switching were the following:
Follow up at 6 months was conducted for 3 study participants, and 1-year follow up was available for 1 study participant. No serious adverse events had been reported at the time the data were presented, and all 4 follow-up patients continued on their respective biosimilar therapy.
Through this prospective study, research has suggested that biosimilars are being considered as first-line therapy options in treating JIA rather than the originator biologic, even though JIA is not an approved indication of these drugs in the United Kingdom. This phenomenon, the researchers say, may be due to the cost savings associated with the biosimilars.
Reference
De Cock D, Kearsley-Fleet L, Baidam E, et al. Biosimilar use in children and young people with juvenile idiopathic arthritis in a real-world setting in the United Kingdom. Abstract presented at The British Society for Rheumatology’s Annual Conference; May 1-3, 2018; Liverpool, United Kingdom. Abstract 28. abstractsonline.com/pp8/#!/4506/presentation/655.
13 Strategies to Avoid the Nocebo Effect During Biosimilar Switching
December 18th 2024A systematic review identified 13 strategies, including patient and provider education, empathetic communication, and shared decision-making, to mitigate the nocebo effect in biosimilar switching, emphasizing the need for a multifaceted approach to improve patient perceptions and therapeutic outcomes.
Biosimilars in America: Overcoming Barriers and Maximizing Impact
July 21st 2024Join us as we explore the complexities of the US biosimilars market, discussing legislative influences, payer and provider adoption factors, and strategies to overcome industry challenges with expert insights from Kyle Noonan, PharmD, MS, value & access strategy manager at Cencora.
Commercial Payer Coverage of Biosimilars: Market Share, Pricing, and Policy Shifts
December 4th 2024Researchers observe significant shifts in payer preferences for originator vs biosimilar products from 2017 to 2022, revealing growing payer interest in multiple product options, alongside the increasing market share of biosimilars, which contributed to notable reductions in both average sales prices and wholesale acquisition costs.
What AmerisourceBergen's Report Reveals About Payers, Biosimilar Pricing Trends
May 28th 2023On this episode of Not So Different, Tasmina Hydery and Brian Biehn from AmerisourceBergen discussed results from a recent survey, that were also presented at Asembia 2023, diving into the payer perspective on biosimilars and current pricing trends across the US biosimilar industry.
Boosting Health Care Sustainability: The Role of Biosimilars in Latin America
November 21st 2024Biosimilars could improve access to biologic treatments and health care sustainability in Latin America, but their adoption is hindered by misconceptions, regulatory gaps, and weak pharmacovigilance, requiring targeted education and stronger regulations.
Breaking Down Biosimilar Barriers: Payer and PBM Policies
November 13th 2024Part 2 of this series for Global Biosimilars Week dives into the complexities of payer and pharmacy benefit manager (PBM) policies, how they impact biosimilar accessibility, and how addressing these issues may look under a second Trump term.