During a recent webinar, experts discussed critical regulatory aspects for generics and biosimilars, highlighting strategies for navigating complex approval processes, the importance of local market understanding, and the role of technology in enhancing submission efficiency.
Experts from IQVIA and the broader pharmaceutical industry gathered to discuss critical aspects of the regulatory landscape for lower-cost products during a recent webinar titled “Expanding Horizons: Regulatory Strategies for Biosimilars and Generics for Global Success.”
Keith McDonald, senior director of regulatory affairs, clinical operations at IQVIA, kicked off the discussion with an exploration of global development strategies for generics and biosimilars, offering insights from both the US and European perspectives. McDonald discussed the Hatch-Waxman Act of 1984, which established a legal framework for generics in the US, emphasizing the importance of bioequivalence for generic approval. He outlined key components required in regulatory dossiers, particularly focusing on the chemistry, manufacturing, and control (CMC) data essential for the approval process.
Transitioning to biosimilars, McDonald provided an in-depth look at their regulatory pathways in both the US and European Union (EU), referencing the Biologics Price Competition and Innovation Act of 2010. He addressed the skepticism that biosimilars initially faced and the ongoing efforts to build confidence in their use. The challenges surrounding biosimilar development were also highlighted, alongside the importance of clinical studies in demonstrating their safety and efficacy.
McDonald also discussed UK-specific regulatory considerations in the wake of Brexit, the colloquial name to describe the UK leaving the EU. As the UK develops its post-EU regulatory identity, he highlighted the country’s approach to biosimilars, emphasizing analytical characterization and pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic data to support approval rather than data from comparative efficacy studies. The possibility of parallel or advance approvals in the UK was raised as a way to streamline biosimilar entry into the market.
Ankit Tyagi, associate director of regulatory affairs at IQVIA, took the stage next, focusing on the operational aspects of expanding into emerging markets. Tyagi highlighted the vast opportunities these markets present, while also stressing the importance of having a thorough understanding of local market dynamics and regulatory requirements.
Tyagi walked through the different approval pathways available in emerging markets, such as mutual recognition and expedited review pathways. He emphasized the critical need for local manufacturing and compliance with country-specific CMC and Good Manufacturing Practice (GMP) requirements. His key takeaway was the necessity of a robust regulatory strategy to successfully navigate the complexities of expanding into these regions.
"A regulatory strategy is not only about selecting the right pathway like [biologics license application or new drug application] for drug approval, it is more towards a comprehensive understanding of the drug development process for state adoption, to the dynamic regulatory environment, knowledge about the local market and availability to leverage regulatory requirements in a way that it can provide a competitive advantage,” he explained.
In addition to approval strategies, Tyagi emphasized the importance of post-approval maintenance. This includes managing change control assessments, planning for renewals, and considering withdrawal strategies. He discussed how local regulatory authorities play a crucial role in ensuring long-term supply chain continuity and compliance in these markets.
Amar Tandon, associate director of regulatory affairs at IQVIA, followed with a discussion on submission strategies and the critical role technology plays in this process. Tandon highlighted the importance of regulatory intelligence for understanding and anticipating local requirements, which can lead to greater efficiency in submissions. He underscored the need for a strong regulatory information management database to support these efforts and ensure that each country’s unique regulatory needs are met.
Chikkam Rama Mohan Rao, senior director of regulatory affairs at IQVIA, provided insights into how digital tools can improve submission efficiency. He highlighted the importance of automation, document management systems, and data integration to ensure the quality and timeliness of approval submissions. Rao emphasized the benefits of electronic submissions and how regulatory intelligence systems can help streamline the process and improve outcomes.
Praveen Reddy, PhD, DVM, DABT, deputy general manager at Lupin Biotech, closed the panel with a discussion on the variations in regulatory requirements across different regions, which can present challenges in dossier submissions. He highlighted the importance of having internal knowledge and strong technological systems to classify and manage these variations effectively. Pillay stressed the need for clear communication and collaboration between sponsors and regulatory agencies to ensure smooth submissions.
The webinar wrapped up with McDonald discussing future trends in the regulatory landscape. He pointed to increasing global alignment among regulatory authorities and the growing importance of international collaboration. McDonald also touched on the role that innovative clinical trial designs and new technologies will play in the future, predicting faster approval processes as a result of these advancements.
McDonald emphasized, “I think there has been, and there continues to be, more global alignment across regulatory authorities…. We can look at the challenging and clinical development of new products, we can think about the increased personalization of new medicines so those new treatments will challenge our expectations on data requirements to demonstrate safety and efficacy. New technologies coming forward will present challenges for regulatory authorities, where the regulatory frameworks have perhaps not considered that type of product previously, and that is where international collaboration can help to drive those standards.”
Reference
Expanding horizons: regulatory strategies for biosimilars and generics for global success. IQVIA. September 16, 2024. Accessed October 9, 2024.https://www.iqvia.com/events/2024/08/expanding-horizons-regulatory-strategies-for-biosimilars-and-generics-for-global-success
FTC Releases Second Report on PBMs Meddling in Generic Drug Markets
January 19th 2025The 3 largest pharmacy benefit managers (PBMs) increased many specialty generic drugs prices by hundreds of percent, with some drugs seeing thousands of percent markups, according to the Federal Trade Commission (FTC)’s second interim report on PBM practices.
Biosimilars Development Roundup for October 2024—Podcast Edition
November 3rd 2024On this episode of Not So Different, we discuss the GRx+Biosims conference, which included discussions on data transparency, artificial intelligence (AI), and collaboration to enhance the global supply chain for biosimilars and generic drugs, as well as the evolving requirements for biosimilar devices.
The Next Frontier: Oncology Biosimilars in 2025 and Beyond
January 13th 2025The US oncology biosimilar market has rapidly evolved since its launch in 2017, driven by steep price discounts, payer adoption, and provider confidence, with an upcoming wave of biosimilars targeting blockbuster biologics promising further market growth, cost savings, and broader patient access.
Biosimilars Policy Roundup for September 2024—Podcast Edition
October 6th 2024On this episode of Not So Different, we discuss the FDA's approval of a new biosimilar for treating retinal conditions, which took place in September 2024 alongside other major industry developments, including ongoing legal disputes and broader trends in market dynamics and regulatory challenges.
Equivalence Confirmed: CT-P41 Paves the Way for Affordable Osteoporosis Care
January 8th 2025Celltrion’s denosumab biosimilar demonstrated equivalent efficacy, safety, and immunogenicity compared with the originator in a phase 3 trial involving postmenopausal women with osteoporosis, paving the way for improved accessibility and cost savings in osteoporosis treatment.