A new report from HHS has revealed that if the Inflation Reduction Act (IRA) had been implemented in 2020, Medicare Part D beneficiaries could have saved a total of $734 million, averaging out to about $500 per member.
A new report from HHS has revealed that if the Inflation Reduction Act (IRA) had been implemented in 2020, Medicare Part D and Part B beneficiaries could have saved a total of $734 million and $27 million, respectively, on insulin products.
When the IRA was passed in 2020, it included a provision to cap Medicare beneficiaries' out-of-pocket (OOP) costs for reference and biosimilar insulin products to $35. A measure to extend the cap to patients covered by private insurance companies failed a Senate vote in August 2022. The Medicare insulin cap went into effect for Part D plans on January 1, 2023, and will go into effect for Part B plans beginning July 1, 2023.
On average, the researchers estimated that 1.5 million beneficiaries covered by Part B or Part D plans missed out on $500 in savings on insulin per member per year by the provision not being in effect in 2020. The report was conducted by the HHS Office of the Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation.
“The Biden-Harris Administration is committed to lowering health care costs and increasing access to high-quality, affordable health care, and the Inflation Reduction Act is helping us do just that…. Thanks to this historic law, people who get their insulin through Medicare won’t have to pay more than $35 for a month’s supply. No one should have to skip or ration their insulin because they can’t afford it,” said Xavier Becerra, HHS secretary, in a statement.
The states with the most people with Medicare Part D or Part B that will benefit from the new provision are Texas (n = 114,000), California (n = 108,000), and Florida (n = 90,000). However, the states that will likely have the highest average annual OOP savings per beneficiary are North Dakota ($805), Iowa ($725), and South Dakota ($725).
“Americans are seeing a strong economy where they live…they are seeing prices down at their pharmacies…. I am more confident than ever that America’s best days are ahead,” commented President Joe Biden in a statement on the new data.
The report sent to Congress examined the role that insulin plays in diabetes treatment and reviewed evidence on how the cost of insulin affects treatment adherence and downstream health consequences. Also included were some policy efforts that could improve the affordability of insulin.
In 2019, about 37% of insulin prescriptions filled by people with Medicare required cost-sharing that exceeded $35 per fill, of which 24% of fills exceeded $70 per fill.
A global survey from 2019 found that 25.9% of US respondents reported having rationed insulin in the previous year, nearly 20% higher than the percentage of respondents from other high-income countries. Additionally, a team at the Yale Diabetes Center found that 1 in 4 patients at the urban clinic at Yale reported some type of cost-related insulin underuse in the past 12 months, which included using less insulin than prescribed, not filling a prescription, and stopping insulin treatment completely.
The insulin OOP cap was originally proposed by CMS in March 2020 as part of the Part D Senior Savings Model, which former President Donald Trump signed an executive order to establish. The model was designed to save beneficiaries who take reference or biosimilar insulin products an average $446 in annual OOP costs for insulin, representing a 66% reduction in the average cost-sharing for insulin. The model was projected to generate $250 million in savings for the federal government over 5 years.
According to Becerra, the 1.5 million beneficiaries now impacted by the IRA’s cap do not include patients who already had their insulin costs capped at $35 through the Senior Savings Model. “Overall, we're looking at all Medicare beneficiaries who are taking insulin. And we're looking to see what they were actually paying out-of-pocket…. We're only counting the 1.5 million as folks who were paying more than $35 a month.”
Challenges and Guidance in Biosimilar Assessment: An ISPOR Report on HTA Agency Approaches
May 14th 2024The ISPOR report highlights the urgent need for clear guidance on when and how to conduct health technology assessments (HTAs) for biosimilars, emphasizing the challenges faced by HTA agencies and the evolving role of HTAs in evaluating biosimilar value.
Biosimilars Policy Roundup for April 2024—Podcast Edition
May 5th 2024On this episode of Not So Different, The Center for Biosimilars® glances back at all the major biosimilar policy updates from April, including 2 FDA approvals, 1 European approval, and several insights into possible policy changes from the Festival of Biologics USA conference.
A New Chapter: How 2023 Will Shape the US Biosimilar Space for 2024 and Beyond
December 31st 2023On this episode of Not So Different, Cencora's Brian Biehn and Corey Ford take a look back at major policy and regulatory advancements in 2023 and how these changes will alter the space going forward.
Dr Sophia Humphreys Provides Calls to Action to Ensure Biosimilar Market Sustainability
April 30th 2024During her presentation during Festival of Biologics USA, Sophia Humphreys, PharmD, director of formulary management at Sutter Health, gave an overview of current challenges and opportunities for the biosimilar market and offered calls to action for multiple stakeholders.