Ireland’s Minister for Health, Simon Harris, announced this week that Ireland is seeking to join Belgium, the Netherlands, Luxembourg, and Austria in their BeNeLuxA Initiative, a group that negotiates price deals on pharmaceuticals directly with manufacturers.
Ireland’s Minister for Health, Simon Harris, announced this week that Ireland is seeking to join Belgium, the Netherlands, Luxembourg, and Austria in their BeNeLuxA Initiative, a group that negotiates price deals on pharmaceuticals directly with manufacturers.
Harris wll now issue a letter of intent to the organization to formally signal Ireland’s interest in joining the collaboration and will travel to Belgium and the Netherlands in the coming weeks to begin discussions with an aim toward joining the bloc. In a statement, Harris said that that supply and price challenges are “…not unique to Ireland, and many countries are battling with the same issues. That is why, over the past [2] years, my department has been engaging with other European countries in an effort to identify solutions to medicines pricing, sustainability, and supply.”
The BeNeLuxA bloc was formed in 2015 with the mission to foster sustainable national healthcare systems in Europe, and to address the challenge of affordability of innovative therapies. The group participates in horizon scanning (seeking information about high-cost therapies that will be become available in the near future), health technology assessments (HTAs), information sharing and policy exchange, and—critically—price negotiations with industry.
According to a discussion paper published the European Public Health Alliance (EPHA) in 2017, health ministers from the Netherlands and Belgium first saw the need for such a negotiating bloc after drug maker Gilead introduced the high-cost sofosbuvir (Sovaldi) in the European marketplace. Realizing the potential for expensive drugs to strain health systems, the founding member states felt that they needed to increase their bargaining power with drug makers.
According to EPHA, drug makers “are used to negotiating bilaterally with national governments. This puts them in a favorable position, having a panoramic overview of each of the 28 EU member states’ pharmaceutical policies, purchasing power, and willingness to pay.” At the same time, national governments lack insight into neighboring countries’ policies, creating an asymmetry of information on drug pricing.
Thus far, BeNeLuxA has not had major successes to report; in May 2017, the bloc announced that it had not been able to reach a deal with drug maker Vertex on its lumacaftor/ivacaftor drug combination for the treatment of cystic fibrosis, which, according to an HTA undertaken by BeNeLuxA, was worth 82% less than Vertex’s asking price. The governments represented by BeNeLuxA declined to supply the drug in their healthcare systems, so patients will not have access to the therapy.
Furthermore, the paper notes that there exists a concern among policy makers that drug companies may attempt to discourage efforts like BeNeLuxA by refusing to negotiate so as not to set a new precedent. EPHA suggests that, as a potential solution, “Governments might wish to respond by making the BeNeLuxA route the only available option for reimbursement of a company’s products or for some clusters of products.”
How AI Can Help Address Cost-Related Nonadherence to Biologic, Biosimilar Treatment
March 9th 2025Despite saving billions, biosimilars still account for only a small share of the biologics market—what's standing in the way of broader adoption and how can artificial intelligence (AI) help change that?
Will the FTC Be More PBM-Friendly Under a Second Trump Administration?
February 23rd 2025On this episode of Not So Different, we explore the Federal Trade Commission’s (FTC) second interim report on pharmacy benefit managers (PBMs) with Joe Wisniewski from Turquoise Health, discussing key issues like preferential reimbursement, drug pricing transparency, biosimilars, shifting regulations, and how a second Trump administration could reshape PBM practices.
From Amjevita to Zarxio: A Decade of US Biosimilar Approvals
March 6th 2025Since the FDA’s groundbreaking approval of Zarxio in 2015, the US biosimilars market has surged to 67 approvals across 18 originators—though the journey has been anything but smooth, with adoption facing hurdles along the way.