Generic drug maker Lannett Company has announced the beginning of a clinical trial of its proposed biosimilar insulin glargine referencing Lantus.
Generic drug maker Lannett Company has announced the beginning of a clinical trial of its proposed biosimilar insulin glargine referencing Lantus.
The single-center, single-dose, double-blind, randomized, 2-period crossover study in healthy volunteers is designed to compare the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of the biosimilar to the US-approved insulin glargine. The trial is being conducted in South Africa.
"Initiating a first-in-human clinical trial of our partnered insulin glargine product is a major milestone in the progression of this project," said Tim Crew, chief executive officer of Lannett, in a statement announcing the start of the trial. "We look forward to the clinical advancement of the product as an affordable treatment option, especially with 29 million Americans suffering with type 1 or type 2 diabetes."
Lannett says that the trial is intended to support the submission of an eventual Biologics License Application for the product.
News that Lannett is poised to submit a BLA for its insulin is a notable step as the United States moves toward its 2020 date for transitioning insulins to regulation as biologics.
The Biologics Price Competition and Innovation Act stipulated that a marketing application for a biologic that could have been submitted under section 505 of the Food, Drug and Cosmetic (FD&C) Act must be submitted under section 351 of the Public Health Service (PHS) Act, but some products, like insulin, were allowed a 10-year transition period, which will expire on March 23, 2020.
Starting on that date, approved applications for biologics approved under the FD&C Act will be deemed to be licensed under the PHS Act, and follow-on drugs such as insulin will have to be submitted to the FDA for regulatory review under the biosimilar approval pathway.
Once insulins are regulated as biologics, it will be possible for drug makers to seek interchangeable designations for their products.
Other drug makers seeking a piece of the United States market for insulin glargine include Mylan and Biocon, which received a Complete Response Letter for their product in June 2018. Boehringer Ingelheim and Eli Lilly’s Basaglar, which is both approved and launched in the United States, has captured 34% of the Medicaid market for long-acting insulins and saved Medicaid more than $70 million, according to a recent research letter in JAMA.
President Trump Signs Executive Order to Bring Down Drug Prices
April 16th 2025To help bring down sky-high drug prices, President Donald Trump signed an executive order pushing for faster biosimilar development, more transparency, and tougher rules on pharmacy benefit managers—aiming to save billions and make meds more affordable for everyone.
How AI Can Help Address Cost-Related Nonadherence to Biologic, Biosimilar Treatment
March 9th 2025Despite saving billions, biosimilars still account for only a small share of the biologics market—what's standing in the way of broader adoption and how can artificial intelligence (AI) help change that?
Latest Biosimilar Deals Signal Growth Across Immunology, Oncology Markets
April 14th 2025During Q1 2025, pharmaceutical companies accelerated biosimilar expansion through strategic acquisitions and partnerships in hopes of boosting patient access to lower-cost treatments in immunology and oncology.
Will the FTC Be More PBM-Friendly Under a Second Trump Administration?
February 23rd 2025On this episode of Not So Different, we explore the Federal Trade Commission’s (FTC) second interim report on pharmacy benefit managers (PBMs) with Joe Wisniewski from Turquoise Health, discussing key issues like preferential reimbursement, drug pricing transparency, biosimilars, shifting regulations, and how a second Trump administration could reshape PBM practices.
Risk-Adjusted NPV Framework for Biosimilars Shows Key Investment Drivers
April 7th 2025Early market entry, manufacturing efficiency, and market share are critical to biosimilar development success, while technical complexity and competition heavily impact returns, according to a study presenting a risk-adjusted net present value (NPV) analysis framework.