While real-world data, such as those derived from the NOR-SWITCH study, have been reassuring about the feasibility of switching patients with inflammatory diseases from reference infliximab (Remicade) to biosimilar CT-P13 (sold as Inflectra and Remsima), some ambiguous data in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) have raised questions among clinicians about switching in the indications of Crohn disease and ulcerative colitis.
While real-world data, such as those derived from the NOR-SWITCH study, have been reassuring about the feasibility of switching patients with inflammatory diseases from reference infliximab (Remicade) to biosimilar CT-P13 (sold as Inflectra and Remsima), some ambiguous data in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) have raised questions among clinicians about switching in the indications of Crohn disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC). Now, new evidence—from the largest study to date in patients with IBD who switched to CT-P13—may answer some of those questions.
The prospective, observational, open-label, multicenter cohort study involved a nonmedical switch undertaken at 4 hospitals in Sweden. The 313 patients treated for IBD in these hospitals (195 for CD and 118 for UC), were switched to the biosimilar. The primary endpoint of the study was change in disease activity at 2, 6, and 12 months postswitch.
Patients received written and verbal education about the switch, and their individual regimens, including infusion intervals and concomitant medication, were not altered in connection with the switch. All but 1 patient was receiving maintenance therapy at the time of the switch. A full 12-month follow-up period was completed by 250 patients.
In total, 10 patients (3.2%) discontinued CT-P13 due to disease remission, 23 (7.4%) discontinued due to lack of efficacy, and 15 (4.8%) due to adverse events (AEs). No significant changes in disease activity (as measured by Harvey-Bradshaw Index or Simple Clinical Colitis Activity Index) were observed between baseline and 2, 6, and 12 months after the switch.
Blood test biomarkers of disease activity did not indicate disease worsening after the switch in either the CD group or the UC group. The mean fecal calprotectin value was increased at 1 months in patients with CD, but not at months 6 or 12 (no significant changes in fecal calprotectin were observed in patients with UC). There were no significant changes in quality of life as measured by Short Heatlh Scale at months 2, 6, or 12. Drug trough levels did not change significantly during followup.
AEs of any type occurred in 24.1% of patients with CD and 21.2% of patients with UC. In 15 cases, AEs led to discontinuation. Rash, fatigue, arthralgia, and headache were the most commonly reported AEs. The number of serious AEs during follow-up was 7 (2.2%).
Notably, disease worsening occurred in 14.0% of patients with CD and 13.8% of patients with UC, which is notable in comparison with NOR-SWITCH data, which showed disease worsening in 36.5% of those with CD and 11.9% of those with UC at 12 months.
“In conclusion, we have demonstrated that switching from Remicade to CT-P13 may be done with preserved therapeutic effectiveness and safety in patients with IBD,” wrote the investigators, adding that “the concerns raised by several previous studies, including a potential difference in the efficacy of CT-P13 in CD compared with UC, were refuted.”
Reference
Bergqvist V, Kadivar M, Molin D, et al. Switching from originator infliximab to the biosimilar CT-P13 in 313 patients with inflammatory bowel disease. Therap Adv Gastroenterol. 2018;11: 1756284818801244. doi: 10.1177/1756284818801244.
Boosting Health Care Sustainability: The Role of Biosimilars in Latin America
November 21st 2024Biosimilars could improve access to biologic treatments and health care sustainability in Latin America, but their adoption is hindered by misconceptions, regulatory gaps, and weak pharmacovigilance, requiring targeted education and stronger regulations.
Biosimilars in America: Overcoming Barriers and Maximizing Impact
July 21st 2024Join us as we explore the complexities of the US biosimilars market, discussing legislative influences, payer and provider adoption factors, and strategies to overcome industry challenges with expert insights from Kyle Noonan, PharmD, MS, value & access strategy manager at Cencora.
Breaking Down Biosimilar Barriers: Payer and PBM Policies
November 13th 2024Part 2 of this series for Global Biosimilars Week dives into the complexities of payer and pharmacy benefit manager (PBM) policies, how they impact biosimilar accessibility, and how addressing these issues may look under a second Trump term.
Biosimilars Gastroenterology Roundup for May 2024—Podcast Edition
June 2nd 2024On this episode of Not So Different, we review the biggest gastroenterology biosimilar stories from May 2024, covering new data from conferences and journals on infliximab and adalimumab products that demonstrate positive clinical results and confirm the safety of these biosimilars, as well as the feasibility of switching to them.
Skyrizi Overtakes Humira: “Product Hopping” Leaves Biosimilar Market in Limbo
November 7th 2024For the first time, Skyrizi (risankizumab-rzaa) has replaced Humira (reference adalimumab) as AbbVie’s sales driver, largely due to companies encouraging “product hopping” to avoid competition, creating concerns for the sustainability of the burgeoning adalimumab biosimilar market.