Autoimmune myasthenia gravis is typically treated with surgery, acetylcholine esterase inhibitors, corticosteroids, and immunosuppressive drugs like azathioprine and mycophenolate mofetil. Some patients have refractory disease and may require therapies like eculizumab (Soliris), which, while effective, is a particularly high-cost biologic that has no approved biosimilars in Europe or the United States, although biosimilars are advancing through clinical development. Rituximab, however, which is lower-cost than eculizumab and has multiple approved biosimilars, has also emerged as a promising treatment.
Autoimmune myasthenia gravis (MG) is typically treated with surgery, acetylcholine esterase inhibitors, corticosteroids, and immunosuppressive drugs like azathioprine and mycophenolate mofetil. Some patients have refractory disease and may require therapies like eculizumab (Soliris), which, while effective, is a particularly high-cost biologic that has no approved biosimilars in Europe or the United States, although biosimilars are advancing through clinical development.
Rituximab, however, which is lower-cost than eculizumab and has multiple approved biosimilars, has also emerged as a promising treatment.
A number of case reports and retrospective studies have shown that rituximab is safe and effective in patients with MG, but optimal dosing has not been established, and regimens adapted from treatment for non-Hodgkin lymphoma have been used. However, based on emerging evidence, low-dose rituximab, administered at 6-month intervals, may be noninferior and may improve the cost-effectiveness of using rituximab in these patients.
A paper published recently in Therapeutic Advances in Neurological Disorders reports on a study that evaluated the efficacy and safety of repeated low-dose rituximab treatment, individualized by monitoring of CD19-positive B cells, in patients with MG that proved refractory to other treatments.
In the retrospective review of 17 patients with MG who were treated with rituximab at 2 teaching hospitals between 2013 and 2017, the treatment protocol comprised induction treatment with low-dose rituximab at a dose of 375 mg/m2 twice with a 2-week period followed by retreatment based on either B-cell repopulation or clinical relapse.
Following rituximab treatment, 11 patients achieved the primary end point of minimal manifestation or better with prednisolone at a dose of 5 mg per day or less after a median of 7.6 months (range, 2-17 months). Over a median follow-up of 24 months (range, 7-49 months), 30 retreatments were given. Six of these retreatments were on the basis of relapse without B-cell repopulation, 16 were given on the basis of repopulation without relapse, and 8 were given on the basis of both repopulation and relapse.
On a group level, say the researchers, B-cell recovery appeared to occur in parallel with relapse, but on an individual level, the association was modest.
“Considering the limited data on the optimal rituximab dose and retreatment schedule, our results are encouraging and have therapeutic implications for refractory MG,” write the authors. “Given the reduced costs and possibly lower risk of adverse effects, we propose that repeated treatment with low-dose rituximab guided by monitoring circulating B cells could be a cost-effective therapeutic option in patients with refractory MG.”
Reference
Choi K, Hong YH, Ahn SH, et al. Repeated low-dose rituximab treatment based on the assessment of circulating B cells in patients with refractory myasthenia gravis [published online September 18, 2019]. Ther Adv Neurol Disord. doi: 10.1177/1756286419871187.
How Vertical Integration Drives Innovation and Access in Biosimilars
December 27th 2024Elie Bahou, PharmD, highlights how vertical integration in the biosimilar industry streamlines costs, improves supply reliability, accelerates market adoption, and enhances patient access, while emphasizing the value of collaboration, quality control, and value-based contracts for sustainable health care delivery.
Biosimilars in America: Overcoming Barriers and Maximizing Impact
July 21st 2024Join us as we explore the complexities of the US biosimilars market, discussing legislative influences, payer and provider adoption factors, and strategies to overcome industry challenges with expert insights from Kyle Noonan, PharmD, MS, value & access strategy manager at Cencora.
13 Strategies to Avoid the Nocebo Effect During Biosimilar Switching
December 18th 2024A systematic review identified 13 strategies, including patient and provider education, empathetic communication, and shared decision-making, to mitigate the nocebo effect in biosimilar switching, emphasizing the need for a multifaceted approach to improve patient perceptions and therapeutic outcomes.
What AmerisourceBergen's Report Reveals About Payers, Biosimilar Pricing Trends
May 28th 2023On this episode of Not So Different, Tasmina Hydery and Brian Biehn from AmerisourceBergen discussed results from a recent survey, that were also presented at Asembia 2023, diving into the payer perspective on biosimilars and current pricing trends across the US biosimilar industry.
Commercial Payer Coverage of Biosimilars: Market Share, Pricing, and Policy Shifts
December 4th 2024Researchers observe significant shifts in payer preferences for originator vs biosimilar products from 2017 to 2022, revealing growing payer interest in multiple product options, alongside the increasing market share of biosimilars, which contributed to notable reductions in both average sales prices and wholesale acquisition costs.
Ocrelizumab Biosimilar Shows Equivalent Efficacy as Multiple Sclerosis Treatment
November 26th 2024The phase 3 trial (NCT04966338) found that a biosimilar ocrelizumab candidate (Xacrel) was equivalent to Ocrevus in reducing the annualized relapse rate and showed comparable safety and efficacy in treating relapsing multiple sclerosis over 96 weeks.