Spain-based drug maker mAbxience is developing a biosimilar rituximab, RTXM83. Last week, researchers reported findings from a head-to-head study of the proposed biosimilar versus its reference product as a first-line treatment for patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL).
Spain-based drug maker mAbxience is developing a biosimilar rituximab, RTXM83. Last week, researchers reported findings from a head-to-head study of the proposed biosimilar versus its reference product as a first-line treatment for patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL).
The multicenter, double-blind, randomized study enrolled 272 newly diagnosed adult patients with DLBCL at 58 sites in 12 countries. Patients were randomized to receive either the reference or the biosimilar rituximab together with cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (CHOP) chemotherapy, and patients were followed for up to 9 months after their last study dose.
The primary efficacy endpoint was to compare overall response rate (ORR) in each treatment arm after cycle 6 or 30 days after the last study dose. Pharmacokinetics (PK), pharmacodynamics (PD), event-free survival (EFS), safety, and immunogenicity were secondary endpoints that were evaluated during treatment and follow-up.
In total, 85% of patients completed all 6 cycles of the study treatment. Exposure to rituximab was similar in the biosimilar and reference arms. In the 239 patients who comprised the intent-to-treat population, after 6 cycles of treatment, the investigators observed a 0.7% difference in ORR in favor of the biosimilar versus the reference (83.6% vs 82.9%), though this difference was not statistically significant. The lower bound of the 95% confidence interval of the difference was —8.77%, which was above the prespecified noninferiority margin of –13%.
Median EFS in the biosimilar and reference arms was similar (12.5 months vs 8.6 months, respectively; P =.4613). PK and PD measurements were also similar in both arms.
The proportion of patients with at least one treatment-emergent adverse event (AE) or serious AE was the same in each arm (96%), and the nature and frequency of AEs were in line with the known profile of rituximab in combination with CHOP. The most frequently reported AEs included hematologic toxicities, infections, and infusion-related reactions.
There was a low incidence of anti-drug antibodies (ADAs) in both treatment arms; 2.3% of patients in the biosimilar arm and 3.2% of those in the reference arm developed new ADAs.
According to the authors, this study—believed to be the first randomized, double-blind study of a biosimilar in patients with DLBCL—demonstrated the noninferiority of the biosimilar to the reference in terms of efficacy and supports the similarity of the 2 rituximab products.
Reference
Candelaria M, González DE, Delamain MT, et al. Rituximab biosimilar RTXM83 versus reference rituximab in combination with CHOP as first-line treatment for diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: a randomized, double-blind study [published online July 4, 2019]. Leuk Lymphoma. doi: 10.1080/10428194.2019.1633632.
Biosimilars Oncology Roundup for June 2024—Podcast Edition
July 7th 2024On this episode of Not So Different, we review biosimilar news coming out of June, with clinical trial results from conferences and a study showcasing how to overcome economic and noneconomic barriers to oncology biosimilars.
Samsung Bioepis Report Showcases Adalimumab Biosimilar Growth in Market Share
October 11th 2024Adalimumab biosimilars have seen a significant increase in market share, from 2% in early 2024 to 22%, as payers and pharmacy benefit managers begin to prioritize these biosimilars over the reference product, Humira.
A New Chapter: How 2023 Will Shape the US Biosimilar Space for 2024 and Beyond
December 31st 2023On this episode of Not So Different, Cencora's Brian Biehn and Corey Ford take a look back at major policy and regulatory advancements in 2023 and how these changes will alter the space going forward.