Maria Manley, LLM, a life sciences expert and London-based partner with Sidley Austin, provides a deep-dive look at the complexities of Brexit and how it is likely to challenge the biologics industry.
In an interview with The Center for Biosimilars®, Maria Manley, LLM, a London-based partner with Sidley Austin, explored the complex challenges that Brexit, which marked the United Kingdom’s official exit from the European Union, has presented regulators and the biopharmaceutical industry.
In preparation, pharmaceutical companies have had to ensure that they were properly registered and domiciled so that they could continue doing business in the United Kingdom and Europe.
The United Kingdom and the European Union established a free trade agreement without tariffs and quotas. However, border checks and product movement present problems in Northern Ireland, which is a part of the United Kingdom but is still allowed to follow some EU rules. Manley said there are 2 sets of litigation applying to these jurisdictions, which add to the complexities of Brexit.
On the upside, the United Kingdom has agreed to acknowledge temporarily the marketing authorizations for pharmaceutical drugs that were previously approved in the European Union, ensuring that any impacts on drug supply are minimal.
Some of the regulatory changes for the biologics industry includes an end to animal toxicology studies. Further, comparative efficacy studies will be required only if the United Kingdom’s Medicines and Health products Regulatory Agency deems that there is a sufficient reason.
A new approval pathway for biologics was designed with the intention of simplifying the current system and accelerating the process to get innovative medicines on the market. Manley said that the United Kingdom may be willing to accept real world evidence in support of product approval applications.
Additionally, Manley discussed the “rolling review” feature added to the United Kingdom’s medicines approval process, which was created to enable applications to move through regulatory review quickly. This review format will apply to novel biologics, including biosimilars.
President Trump Signs Executive Order to Bring Down Drug Prices
April 16th 2025To help bring down sky-high drug prices, President Donald Trump signed an executive order pushing for faster biosimilar development, more transparency, and tougher rules on pharmacy benefit managers—aiming to save billions and make meds more affordable for everyone.
How AI Can Help Address Cost-Related Nonadherence to Biologic, Biosimilar Treatment
March 9th 2025Despite saving billions, biosimilars still account for only a small share of the biologics market—what's standing in the way of broader adoption and how can artificial intelligence (AI) help change that?
Experts Pressure Congress to Remove Roadblocks for Biosimilars
April 12th 2025Lawmakers and expert witnesses emphasized the potential of biosimilars to lower health care costs by overcoming barriers like pharmacy benefit manager practices, limited awareness, and regulatory delays to improve access and competition in chronic disease management during a recent congressional hearing.
Will the FTC Be More PBM-Friendly Under a Second Trump Administration?
February 23rd 2025On this episode of Not So Different, we explore the Federal Trade Commission’s (FTC) second interim report on pharmacy benefit managers (PBMs) with Joe Wisniewski from Turquoise Health, discussing key issues like preferential reimbursement, drug pricing transparency, biosimilars, shifting regulations, and how a second Trump administration could reshape PBM practices.
PBM Evolution Toward Value-Based Care Shifts to Transparent Pharmacy Pricing
March 30th 2025Josh Canavan, PharmD, RazorMetrics, and Chris O'Dell, Turquoise Health, predict pharmacy benefit managers (PBMs) will evolve toward value-based care, mirroring the broader shift toward open-cost structures.
Review Calls for Path to Global Harmonization of Biosimilar Development Regulations
March 17th 2025Global biosimilar regulatory harmonization will be needed to reduce development costs and improve patient access, despite challenges posed by differing national requirements and regulatory frameworks, according to review authors.