Merck today announced the US launch of its biosimilar infliximab, Renflexis, which it developed under a joint venture with Samsung Bioepis.
Merck today announced the US launch of its biosimilar infliximab, Renflexis, which it developed under a joint venture with Samsung Bioepis.
Merck’s product, a tumor necrosis factor (TNF) blocker referenced on Janssen Biotech’s Remicade, was approved by the FDA on April 21, 2017 for the treatment of Crohn’s disease, pediatric Crohn’s disease, ulcerative colitis, rheumatoid arthritis, ankylosing spondylitis, psoriatic arthritis, and plaque psoriasis.
Merck will introduce the drug at a US list price of $753.39, which it says represents a 35% discount to the price of the reference Remicade. That price point puts renewed pressure on Janssen; while Remicade earned the Johnson and Johnson division $4.8 billion in 2016, or 9.7% of its 2016 revenue, Remicade’s sales slipped after competition from Celltrion's biosimilar infliximab, Inflectra. When Pfizer, which has commercialization rights to the drug, introduced Inflectra in 2016, it set its product’s list price at only a 15% discount to that of Remicade; Merck’s deeper discount has the potential to encroach on Remicade’s sales figures even further.
“Merck looks forward to launching Renflexis in the United States to help meet the needs of patients, physicians and payers,” said Dora Bibila, general manager of Merck Biosimilars. “As a global healthcare leader, Merck believes that biosimilars have the potential to help increase access to these important medicines while also providing savings for the health care system.” Merck plans to make available comprehensive education and support services for healthcare professionals, patients, and caregivers, including reimbursement and access support.
Despite Merck’s move to introduce Renflexis to the United States, Janssen seeks to retain its hold on the infliximab market through litigation. Earlier this year, Janssen filed a district court lawsuit to prevent the sale of Merck and Samsung Bioepis’ infliximab product in the US, saying that the biosimilar product’s manufacturers had violated several of its patents.
Samsung Bioepis, for its part, believes that the case will be resolved in its and Merck’s favor. “We are confident we do not infringe on Janssen’s patents,” a company spokesperson, told Reuters. “We will take all necessary measures against Janssen's attempts to violate patient rights and deny patient access to effective, lower-cost treatment options."
Eye on Pharma: Sandoz Files Antitrust Suit; Yuflyma Interchangeability; Costco’s Ustekinumab Pick
April 22nd 2025Sandoz's antitrust suit against Amgen, the FDA’s interchangeability designation for Celltrion’s adalimumab biosimilar, and the inclusion of an ustekinumab biosimilar in Costco’s prescription program highlight growing momentum to expand biosimilar access and affordability for patients with chronic inflammatory diseases.
How AI Can Help Address Cost-Related Nonadherence to Biologic, Biosimilar Treatment
March 9th 2025Despite saving billions, biosimilars still account for only a small share of the biologics market—what's standing in the way of broader adoption and how can artificial intelligence (AI) help change that?
Latest Biosimilar Deals Signal Growth Across Immunology, Oncology Markets
April 14th 2025During Q1 2025, pharmaceutical companies accelerated biosimilar expansion through strategic acquisitions and partnerships in hopes of boosting patient access to lower-cost treatments in immunology and oncology.
Will the FTC Be More PBM-Friendly Under a Second Trump Administration?
February 23rd 2025On this episode of Not So Different, we explore the Federal Trade Commission’s (FTC) second interim report on pharmacy benefit managers (PBMs) with Joe Wisniewski from Turquoise Health, discussing key issues like preferential reimbursement, drug pricing transparency, biosimilars, shifting regulations, and how a second Trump administration could reshape PBM practices.
Risk-Adjusted NPV Framework for Biosimilars Shows Key Investment Drivers
April 7th 2025Early market entry, manufacturing efficiency, and market share are critical to biosimilar development success, while technical complexity and competition heavily impact returns, according to a study presenting a risk-adjusted net present value (NPV) analysis framework.