- Bone Health
- Immunology
- Hematology
- Respiratory
- Dermatology
- Diabetes
- Gastroenterology
- Neurology
- Oncology
- Ophthalmology
- Rare Disease
- Rheumatology
Molly Burich: Biosimilar Regulation and Policy in the European Union and the United States
Molly Burich, MS, associate director of public policy: biosimilars, pipeline, and reimbursement at Boehringer Ingelheim, discusses major regulatory and policy differences between the European Union and the United States.
Transcript:
What are some of the major regulatory and policy differences between biosimilars in the US and the EU?
In the European Union, they’ve had biosimilars than the US—they’ve had them in clinical practice for about 11 years. Comparing the two systems is very challenging in a lot of ways, but there are some fundamental differences. A couple of the main differences are that the European Union doesn’t require an additional level or designation of interchangeability to drive automatic substitution. In the US, the FDA requires that, so there will be no automatic substitution unless the interchangeability designation is met. So that’s a pretty significant difference because of the investment required to obtain that designation. There are also changes in naming and labeling. In terms of naming, the European Union determined that there does not need to be a suffix, so no designation because the biosimilars, as they will in the US, have a separate brand name but the generic name or the INN looks the same. Lastly, with labeling, labels in general look very different in the US versus the EU but there’s very little distinction in terms of biosimilar label versus the reference product, in part because the EU has more experience potentially, so there are some key differences. I think the biggest though is interchangeability and I think time will tell as to what that designation means in terms of value to all stakeholders, health plans, physicians, and patients.
BioRationality: EMA Accepts Waiver of Clinical Efficacy Testing of Biosimilars
April 21st 2025Sarfaraz K. Niazi, PhD, shares his latest citizen's petition to the FDA, calling on the agency to waive clinical efficacy testing in response to the European Medicines Agency's (EMA) efforts towards the same goal.
How AI Can Help Address Cost-Related Nonadherence to Biologic, Biosimilar Treatment
March 9th 2025Despite saving billions, biosimilars still account for only a small share of the biologics market—what's standing in the way of broader adoption and how can artificial intelligence (AI) help change that?
How State Substitution Laws Shape Insulin Biosimilar Adoption
April 15th 2025States with fewer restrictions on biosimilar substitution tend to see higher uptake of interchangeable insulin glargine, showing how even small policy details can significantly influence biosimilar adoption and expand access to more affordable insulin.
Will the FTC Be More PBM-Friendly Under a Second Trump Administration?
February 23rd 2025On this episode of Not So Different, we explore the Federal Trade Commission’s (FTC) second interim report on pharmacy benefit managers (PBMs) with Joe Wisniewski from Turquoise Health, discussing key issues like preferential reimbursement, drug pricing transparency, biosimilars, shifting regulations, and how a second Trump administration could reshape PBM practices.
BioRationality: Commemorating the 15th Anniversary of the BPCIA
April 8th 2025Affirming that analytical characterization is often sufficient for biosimilar approval, minimizing unnecessary clinical testing, and enhancing FDA-led education to counter stakeholder misconceptions are key recommendations put forth in this opinion piece by Sarfaraz K. Niazi, PhD.
