A multibiomarker disease activity score looks at serum protein activity for a more sensitive evaluation of biosimilarity, investigators said at the American College of Rheumatology Convergence 2020 meeting.
Investigators have presented evidence of what they say are successful, first-time tests of a multibiomarker disease activity (MBDA) score in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Separate comparative studies of infliximab and adalimumab biosimilars vs their reference counterparts were presented at the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Convergence 2020 meeting.
The value of the MBDA score (Vectra) is that it consists of measures of 12 serum proteins and is highly sensitive, thereby offering an alternative to “subjective” clinical observation of patient progress, they explained.
“Comparison of MBDA scores between treatment groups may provide additional evidence of biosimilarity using an objective, quantitative assessment of disease activity that is independent of the potential subjectivity of joint counts or patient or physician global assessments,” said Jonathan Kay, MD, of the University of Massachusetts Medical School, who served as lead investigator for both studies.
Both studies involved Pfizer biosimilars and were sponsored by Pfizer.
Infliximab Study
In the first study, patients were randomized to treatment with an infliximab biosimilar (Ixifi) vs reference infliximab (Remicade) sourced from the European Union.1
Investigators enrolled 650 patients who met 2010 ACR/EULAR disease classification criteria and had ≥ 4 months of RA duration. They received 3 mg/kg of infliximab intravenously at weeks 0, 2, 6 and then every 8 weeks, in combination with methotrexate (MTX). MBDA scores were on a scale of 1 to 100, with 100 being the highest level of disease activity. They reported initial treatment period activity for weeks 0 to 30.
Baseline mean scores for patients receiving the infliximab biosimilar were 61.3 vs 58.8 for the reference product. For the overall population, the mean scores at 30 weeks were 46.9 for both biosimilar and reference groups.
The proportions of patients with high MBDA scores at baseline in both the biosimilar and reference cohorts were similar: 66.0% vs 66.9%, respectively. At week 30, the proportions of patients with high MBDA scores decreased to 42.3% and 40.2%, respectively.
Investigators said the decreases in individual serum biomarker levels that formed the composite MBDA score also were similar between biosimilar and reference groups. They identified 3 biomarkers for which this was true—serum amyloid A, tumor necrosis factor receptor 1, and VEGF-A—but they said it held true also for other biomarkers included in the MBDA score.
Mean MBDA scores decreased 15.2 and 14.1 points, respectively from baseline to week 6 in the 2 groups, and disease stability between cohorts was noted through week 30.
Adalimumab Study
In the second study, investigators enrolled 597 patients with RA by 2010/EULAR criteria and disease duration of ≥ 4 months. They were randomized to adalimumab biosimilar (Abrilada) or European Union–sourced adalimumab reference product and received 40 mg subcutaneously every other week, in combination with MTX.2
Mean MBDA scores were calculated at baseline and weeks 6, 12, and 26. At baseline, the mean MBDA scores for the biosimilar and reference groups were 57.2 and 58.3, respectively. “Mean values of MBDA scores were comparable between treatment groups at all measured time points through 26 weeks,” the investigators wrote.
The proportions of patients with high MBDA scores decreased to 45.5% and 41.7% at week 26. Mean MBDA scores dropped from baseline by 11.9 and 12.4 points, respectively, by week 6; by 11.7 and 12.4 points at week 12; and by 14.3 and 15.5 points at week 26, respectively. Again, individual serum biomarker levels tracked one another closely between biosimilar and reference cohorts.
The mean scores over the 26 weeks for both cohorts were similar, leading adalimumab investigators to conclude: “MBDA score based on 12 serum biomarkers provides a sensitive and objective clinical assessment of biosimilarity that does not require physical examination of the patient or subjective patient global assessment of DA."
References
1. Kay J, alvarez D, Rehman MI, Zhang M, Iikuni N. Use of multi-biomarker disease activity scores to assess biosimilarity in a phase 3, randomized controlled trial comparing biosimilar infliximab-qbtx (PF-06438179/GP1111) with EU-sourced reference infliximab in patients with active RA. Presented at: ACR Convergence 2020; November 5-9, 2020. Abstract 1204.
2. Kay J, Bock A, Iikuni N, Zhang W, Alvarez D. Use of multi-biomarker disease activity scores to compare biosimilar adalimumab-afzb (PF-06410293) with EU-sourced reference adalimumab in a phase 3, randomized, double-blind trial in patients with active RA. Presented at: ACR Convergence 2020; November 5-9, 2020. Abstract 1233.
Eye on Pharma: EU Aflibercept Approvals; Biosimilars Canada Campaign; Celltrion Data
November 19th 2024The European Commission grants marketing authorization to 2 aflibercept biosimilars; Biosimilars Canada launches new campaign to provide sustainable solutions to employers; Celltrion shares positive data for 2 biosimilars.
Breaking Barriers in Osteoporosis Care: New Denosumab Biosimilars Wyost, Jubbonti Approved
June 16th 2024In this episode, The Center for Biosimilars® delves into the FDA approval of the first denosumab biosimilars, Wyost and Jubbonti (denosumab-bbdz), and discuss their potential to revolutionize osteoporosis treatment with expert insights from 2 rheumatologists.
Insights from Festival of Biologics: Dracey Poore Discusses Cardinal Health’s 2024 Biosimilar Report
May 19th 2024The discussion highlights key emerging trends from the Festival of Biologics conference and the annual Cardinal Health Biosimilars Report, including the importance of sustainability in the health care landscape and the challenges and successes in biosimilar adoption and affordability.
Panelists Stress Stakeholder Education to Build Confidence in Biosimilars
October 31st 2024By expanding educational initiatives to clarify biosimilar safety, efficacy, and interchangeability, stakeholders can foster trust, improve access, and ensure that biosimilars are widely accepted as high-quality, cost-effective alternatives to originator biologics.