The biosimilar insulin will be sold under the brand name Semglee in a 100 IU/mL 3mL prefilled pen presentation in both territories. Mylan and Biocon say that they plans to launch the product in various markets in Europe in the second half of 2018, and in Australia “later this year.”
Mylan and Biocon have announced that their co-developed insulin glargine biosimilar, referencing Lantus, has been authorized for marketing by both the European Commission (EC), following a previous positive opinion from the Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use (CHMP) in January 2018, as well as by the Therapeutic Goods Administration of Australia.
The biosimilar insulin will be sold under the brand name Semglee in a 100 IU/mL 3mL prefilled pen presentation in both territories. The partnership says that it plans to launch the product in various markets in Europe in the second half of 2018, and in Australia “later this year.”
This is the first product from Mylan and Biocon’s joint portfolio to receive a marketing authorization in Europe, and Biocon’s CEO and joint managing director, Arun Chandavarkar, PhD, called the 2 approvals “important milestones” in its work with Mylan.
The partnership has also submitted the product for approval in the United States, though the drug will, if approved, follow the approval pathway for new drugs, not biosimilars; in the United States, insulins are currently regulated as drugs and not as biologics, and follow-on product sponsors must therefore submit New Drug Applications (NDAs), rather than Biologics License Applications, for these drugs.
In addition to being subject to a different approval path in the United States, Semglee also faces unique legal obstacles along the road to reach the US market; in October 2017, Sanofi, maker of the reference Lantus, sued Mylan in a New Jersey district court, saying that Mylan has infringed on 18 patents for the reference drug in developing Semglee. According to Sanofi, the Mylan NDA for Semglee included a challenge to all of Sanofi’s patents listed for Lantus in the FDA’s orange book. Then, in December 2017, Mylan announced that the United States Patent Trial and Appeal Board had instituted inter partes review proceedings against all claims of 2 patents covering Sanofi’s Lantus.
US regulatory challenges linger for the drug, as well. In February, Biocon received a Form 483 from the FDA, noting 6 observations, after a pre-approval inspection of its insulin manufacturing facility in Malaysia revealed conditions that may have constituted violations of the Food Drug and Cosmetic Act.
Review Calls for Path to Global Harmonization of Biosimilar Development Regulations
March 17th 2025Global biosimilar regulatory harmonization will be needed to reduce development costs and improve patient access, despite challenges posed by differing national requirements and regulatory frameworks, according to review authors.
How AI Can Help Address Cost-Related Nonadherence to Biologic, Biosimilar Treatment
March 9th 2025Despite saving billions, biosimilars still account for only a small share of the biologics market—what's standing in the way of broader adoption and how can artificial intelligence (AI) help change that?
From Amjevita to Zarxio: A Decade of US Biosimilar Approvals
March 6th 2025Since the FDA’s groundbreaking approval of Zarxio in 2015, the US biosimilars market has surged to 67 approvals across 18 originators—though the journey has been anything but smooth, with adoption facing hurdles along the way.
Will the FTC Be More PBM-Friendly Under a Second Trump Administration?
February 23rd 2025On this episode of Not So Different, we explore the Federal Trade Commission’s (FTC) second interim report on pharmacy benefit managers (PBMs) with Joe Wisniewski from Turquoise Health, discussing key issues like preferential reimbursement, drug pricing transparency, biosimilars, shifting regulations, and how a second Trump administration could reshape PBM practices.
Biosimilar Approvals Streamlined With Advanced Statistics Amidst Differing Regulatory Requirements
February 25th 2025The FDA and European Medicines Agency (EMA) mandate high similarity between biosimilars and reference products, but their regulatory processes differ, especially with multiple reference products.
Review Calls for Path to Global Harmonization of Biosimilar Development Regulations
March 17th 2025Global biosimilar regulatory harmonization will be needed to reduce development costs and improve patient access, despite challenges posed by differing national requirements and regulatory frameworks, according to review authors.
How AI Can Help Address Cost-Related Nonadherence to Biologic, Biosimilar Treatment
March 9th 2025Despite saving billions, biosimilars still account for only a small share of the biologics market—what's standing in the way of broader adoption and how can artificial intelligence (AI) help change that?
From Amjevita to Zarxio: A Decade of US Biosimilar Approvals
March 6th 2025Since the FDA’s groundbreaking approval of Zarxio in 2015, the US biosimilars market has surged to 67 approvals across 18 originators—though the journey has been anything but smooth, with adoption facing hurdles along the way.
Will the FTC Be More PBM-Friendly Under a Second Trump Administration?
February 23rd 2025On this episode of Not So Different, we explore the Federal Trade Commission’s (FTC) second interim report on pharmacy benefit managers (PBMs) with Joe Wisniewski from Turquoise Health, discussing key issues like preferential reimbursement, drug pricing transparency, biosimilars, shifting regulations, and how a second Trump administration could reshape PBM practices.
Biosimilar Approvals Streamlined With Advanced Statistics Amidst Differing Regulatory Requirements
February 25th 2025The FDA and European Medicines Agency (EMA) mandate high similarity between biosimilars and reference products, but their regulatory processes differ, especially with multiple reference products.
2 Commerce Drive
Cranbury, NJ 08512