Genentech has announced that a phase 3 study of its brand-name rituximab, Rituxan, met its primary end point and demonstrated that treatment with rituximab is superior to treatment with mycophenolate mofetil in patients with moderate to severe pemphigus vulgaris (PV), a rate autoimmune disease that affects the skin and mucous membranes.
Genentech has announced that a phase 3 study of its brand-name rituximab, Rituxan, met its primary end point and demonstrated that treatment with rituximab is superior to treatment with mycophenolate mofetil in patients with moderate to severe pemphigus vulgaris (PV), a rate autoimmune disease that affects the skin and mucous membranes.
In the PEMPHIX study, a double-blind, double-dummy, active-comparator, parallel arm study in patients requiring oral corticosteroids, patients were randomized to receive either rituximab plus a placebo or mycophenolate mofetil plus a placebo for 52 weeks along with steroids, with the aim of tapering the steroid dose to 0 by week 24.
The primary end point at week 52 was the percentage of participants who achieved sustained complete remission without treatment failure; the study met this end point, with 40.3% of patients treated with rituximab, versus just 9.5% of patients treated with mycophenolate mofetil, achieving sustained complete remission without steroids for 16 weeks or more (P = .0001).
Secondary end points also favored rituximab, says Genentech: Patients treated with the biologic had lower cumulative oral corticosteroid doses, fewer flares, a greater likelihood of sustained complete remission, a lower likelihood of flares, and greater improvements in quality of life. Adverse events were consistent with the known profile of rituximab.
The results were presented in a late-breaking oral presentation during the 28th Congress of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology in Madrid, Spain.
The FDA first approved the brand-name rituximab for PV in 2018 on the basis of a different phase 3 study, the Ritux 3 trial, which showed that rituximab plus corticosteroids was superior to corticosteroids alone as first-line treatment for patients with PV. As a results of the findings, the International Bullous Disease Consensus Group reached an international consensus to recommend rituximab and corticosteroids as first-line therapy for moderate to severe PV.
The newly reported data could help Genentech and its innovator drug stay ahead of biosimilar competition, at least in the PV market; notably, the 2 currently FDA-approved biosimilar rituximab products, Pfizer’s Ruxience and Celltrion’s Truxima, are not approved to treat PV. The biosimilars both have so-called “skinny labels” due to patent protections and exclusivities for the reference drug. Neither drug has yet announced a launch date for the US marketplace.
From Amjevita to Zarxio: A Decade of US Biosimilar Approvals
March 6th 2025Since the FDA’s groundbreaking approval of Zarxio in 2015, the US biosimilars market has surged to 67 approvals across 18 originators—though the journey has been anything but smooth, with adoption facing hurdles along the way.
How AI Can Help Address Cost-Related Nonadherence to Biologic, Biosimilar Treatment
March 9th 2025Despite saving billions, biosimilars still account for only a small share of the biologics market—what's standing in the way of broader adoption and how can artificial intelligence (AI) help change that?
Will the FTC Be More PBM-Friendly Under a Second Trump Administration?
February 23rd 2025On this episode of Not So Different, we explore the Federal Trade Commission’s (FTC) second interim report on pharmacy benefit managers (PBMs) with Joe Wisniewski from Turquoise Health, discussing key issues like preferential reimbursement, drug pricing transparency, biosimilars, shifting regulations, and how a second Trump administration could reshape PBM practices.
The Banking of Biosimilars: Insights From a Leading Health Economist
February 4th 2025Biosimilars have the potential to reduce health care costs and expand patient access, but economic and policy barriers affect adoption, explored James D. Chambers, PhD, MPharm, MSc, associate professor at the Tufts Medical Center Institute for Clinical Research and Health Policy Studies, in an interview.