Genentech has announced that a phase 3 study of its brand-name rituximab, Rituxan, met its primary end point and demonstrated that treatment with rituximab is superior to treatment with mycophenolate mofetil in patients with moderate to severe pemphigus vulgaris (PV), a rate autoimmune disease that affects the skin and mucous membranes.
Genentech has announced that a phase 3 study of its brand-name rituximab, Rituxan, met its primary end point and demonstrated that treatment with rituximab is superior to treatment with mycophenolate mofetil in patients with moderate to severe pemphigus vulgaris (PV), a rate autoimmune disease that affects the skin and mucous membranes.
In the PEMPHIX study, a double-blind, double-dummy, active-comparator, parallel arm study in patients requiring oral corticosteroids, patients were randomized to receive either rituximab plus a placebo or mycophenolate mofetil plus a placebo for 52 weeks along with steroids, with the aim of tapering the steroid dose to 0 by week 24.
The primary end point at week 52 was the percentage of participants who achieved sustained complete remission without treatment failure; the study met this end point, with 40.3% of patients treated with rituximab, versus just 9.5% of patients treated with mycophenolate mofetil, achieving sustained complete remission without steroids for 16 weeks or more (P = .0001).
Secondary end points also favored rituximab, says Genentech: Patients treated with the biologic had lower cumulative oral corticosteroid doses, fewer flares, a greater likelihood of sustained complete remission, a lower likelihood of flares, and greater improvements in quality of life. Adverse events were consistent with the known profile of rituximab.
The results were presented in a late-breaking oral presentation during the 28th Congress of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology in Madrid, Spain.
The FDA first approved the brand-name rituximab for PV in 2018 on the basis of a different phase 3 study, the Ritux 3 trial, which showed that rituximab plus corticosteroids was superior to corticosteroids alone as first-line treatment for patients with PV. As a results of the findings, the International Bullous Disease Consensus Group reached an international consensus to recommend rituximab and corticosteroids as first-line therapy for moderate to severe PV.
The newly reported data could help Genentech and its innovator drug stay ahead of biosimilar competition, at least in the PV market; notably, the 2 currently FDA-approved biosimilar rituximab products, Pfizer’s Ruxience and Celltrion’s Truxima, are not approved to treat PV. The biosimilars both have so-called “skinny labels” due to patent protections and exclusivities for the reference drug. Neither drug has yet announced a launch date for the US marketplace.
The Banking of Biosimilars: Insights From a Leading Health Economist
February 4th 2025Biosimilars have the potential to reduce health care costs and expand patient access, but economic and policy barriers affect adoption, explored James D. Chambers, PhD, MPharm, MSc, associate professor at the Tufts Medical Center Institute for Clinical Research and Health Policy Studies, in an interview.
Biosimilars in America: Overcoming Barriers and Maximizing Impact
July 21st 2024Join us as we explore the complexities of the US biosimilars market, discussing legislative influences, payer and provider adoption factors, and strategies to overcome industry challenges with expert insights from Kyle Noonan, PharmD, MS, value & access strategy manager at Cencora.
Exploring the Biosimilar Horizon: Julie Reed's Predictions for 2024
February 18th 2024On this episode of Not So Different, Julie Reed, executive director of the Biosimilars Forum, returns to discuss her predictions for the biosimilar industry for 2024 and beyond as well as the impact that the Forum's 4 new members will have on the organization's mission.
Eye on Pharma: Golimumab Biosimilar Update; Korea Approves Denosumab; Xbrane, Intas Collaboration
December 10th 2024Alvotech and Advanz Pharma have submitted a European marketing application for their golimumab biosimilar to treat inflammatory diseases, while Celltrion secured Korean approval for denosumab biosimilars, and Intas Pharmaceuticals partnered with Xbrane Biopharma on a nivolumab biosimilar.
Commercial Payer Coverage of Biosimilars: Market Share, Pricing, and Policy Shifts
December 4th 2024Researchers observe significant shifts in payer preferences for originator vs biosimilar products from 2017 to 2022, revealing growing payer interest in multiple product options, alongside the increasing market share of biosimilars, which contributed to notable reductions in both average sales prices and wholesale acquisition costs.