The United Kingdom’s National Health Service (NHS) has published a new document for clinical and nonclinical stakeholders about the role of biosimilars in the healthcare system. The guidance document, says the NHS, is intended to support the safe, effective, consistent use of biologics, including biosimilars, to the benefit of patients.
The United Kingdom’s National Health Service (NHS) has published a new document for clinical and nonclinical stakeholders about the role of biosimilars in the healthcare system. The guidance document, says the NHS, is intended to support the safe, effective, consistent use of biologics, including biosimilars, to the benefit of patients.
In the document, the NHS explains that, by 2021, through the use of the best-value biologics, the NHS can save at least £400 million to £500 million (US $508 million to $635 million) per year. Maximizing the value of the medicines for which the NHS pays will allow the NHS to produce “much-needed headroom” for funding innovative treatments and improving pathways of care.
The guidance explains such concepts as the inherent variability in the structure of all biologics, the difference between generics and biosimilars, the extrapolation of indications, and the European approval pathway for biosimilars.
It also explains that in cases in which the nation’s health technology assessment body, the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE), has already recommended use of the reference product, the same guidance will typically apply to the biosimilar.
It also highlights the fact that prescribers can switch patients from the reference to a biosimilar, and the decision of which product to prescribe rests with the prescriber in consultation with the patient. “Biosimilar products are considered to be interchangeable with their reference product; which means a prescriber can choose the biosimilar medicine over the reference product (or vice versa) and expect to achieve the same clinical effect,” the guidance notes. Pharmacy-level substitution is not permitted without consultation with the prescriber for any type of biologic, including biosimilars.
In keeping with national guidance and EU law, all biologics should be prescribed by brand name, not by international nonproprietary name, it adds. This practice should ensure that unintended substitution does not take place. Any adverse event should be reported using the brand name and specific batch number. Brand and batch information should also be provided to patients when products are administered to help them to report any issues accurately.
The guidance document is an update to 2015 guidance on biosimilars, and it was prepared in partnership with such stakeholders as the Association of the British Pharmaceutical Industry, the British Biosimilars Association, NICE, and the National Rheumatoid Arthritis Society, among others.
President Trump Signs Executive Order to Bring Down Drug Prices
April 16th 2025To help bring down sky-high drug prices, President Donald Trump signed an executive order pushing for faster biosimilar development, more transparency, and tougher rules on pharmacy benefit managers—aiming to save billions and make meds more affordable for everyone.
Will the FTC Be More PBM-Friendly Under a Second Trump Administration?
February 23rd 2025On this episode of Not So Different, we explore the Federal Trade Commission’s (FTC) second interim report on pharmacy benefit managers (PBMs) with Joe Wisniewski from Turquoise Health, discussing key issues like preferential reimbursement, drug pricing transparency, biosimilars, shifting regulations, and how a second Trump administration could reshape PBM practices.
Experts Pressure Congress to Remove Roadblocks for Biosimilars
April 12th 2025Lawmakers and expert witnesses emphasized the potential of biosimilars to lower health care costs by overcoming barriers like pharmacy benefit manager practices, limited awareness, and regulatory delays to improve access and competition in chronic disease management during a recent congressional hearing.
Biosimilars Policy Roundup for September 2024—Podcast Edition
October 6th 2024On this episode of Not So Different, we discuss the FDA's approval of a new biosimilar for treating retinal conditions, which took place in September 2024 alongside other major industry developments, including ongoing legal disputes and broader trends in market dynamics and regulatory challenges.
BioRationality: Commemorating the 15th Anniversary of the BPCIA
April 8th 2025Affirming that analytical characterization is often sufficient for biosimilar approval, minimizing unnecessary clinical testing, and enhancing FDA-led education to counter stakeholder misconceptions are key recommendations put forth in this opinion piece by Sarfaraz K. Niazi, PhD.