A real-world study using data from the French National Health Data System, found no significant differences in treatment persistence or safety between anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α biosimilars and reference products in all indications of these biologics.
A real-world study using data from the French National Health Data System, which covers 99% of the French population, found no significant differences in treatment persistence or safety between anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α biosimilars and reference products in all indications of these biologics.
TNF-α plays an important role in immune-mediated inflammatory diseases by inducing transcription factor activity and signaling pathways that lead to, for example, immune cell activation and release of pro-inflammatory cytokines. Monoclonal antibodies targeting TNF, including etanercept, infliximab, and adalimumab are expensive but they “have significantly improved the therapeutic care of immune-mediated inflammatory diseases,” the authors said. However, biosimilars have lowered the cost of treatment. In Europe, there are 4 approved infliximab biosimilars starting in 2015, 12 adalimumab biosimilars starting in 2018, and 4 etanercept biosimilars starting in 2016 have been approved and are on the market in Europe.
Data from the French National Health Data System was used to identify patients initiating therapy with infliximab, adalimumab, and etanercept between 2015 and 2021. Patients were followed for 1 year after initiation, and persistence and safety were compared between those treated with reference products and biosimilars. There were 86,776 patients included in the study, 22,670 treated with infliximab, 24,442 treated with etanercept, and 39,664 treated with adalimumab. About half of patients (49,752; 53%) initiated treatment with biosimilars. The investigators reported that baseline patient characteristics were similar between originator and biosimilar users within each molecule.
Risk of Discontinuation Either Similar or Lower in Biosimilar Groups
For patients receiving infliximab, 39% of patients on the biosimilar discontinued treatment, compared to 38% on the reference product. For etanercept, 46% of patients on the biosimilar discontinued treatment, compared to 52% on the reference product. For adalimumab, 43% of patients in both biosimilar and reference product groups discontinued treatment. In their analysis, the authors found no significant differences in the risk of discontinuation between biosimilar and reference product groups overall.
In some subgroups, however, the risk of discontinuation was lower in patients receiving biosimilar treatment: infliximab treatment in Crohn disease (adjusted HR [aHR]; 0.83; 95% CI, 0.71-0.96), mainly in patients using CT-P13; etanercept treatment in rheumatoid arthritis (aHR, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.78-0.93), ankylosing spondylitis (aHR, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.80-0.96), and psoriasis (aHR, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.65-1.00); and adalimumab treatment of ankylosing spondylitis (aHR, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.81-0.97).
No Significant Differences in Adverse Event Rates
The investigators reported, “across molecules, adverse event rates were mostly similar.” The most frequently observed adverse events were severe infection, all-cause hospitalization, and death. There were no significant differences between biosimilar- and originator-treated patients within each molecule.
The authors concluded their study showed no differences in persistence and safety in real-world use of anti-TNF biosimilars compared to their reference products in all licensed indications. To their knowledge, this is the largest real-world cohort of infliximab, etanercept, and adalimumab biosimilar and originator users, and the first to be assessed for persistence and safety. They added that their results suggest anti-TNF biosimilars can be “used more broadly in order to limit the financial impact of these molecules on health systems.”
Reference
Jourdain H, Hoisnard L, Sbidian E, Zureik M. Persistence and safety of anti-TNF biosimilars versus originators in immune-mediated inflammatory diseases: an observational study on the French National Health Data System. RMD Open. 2024;10(1):e003531. doi:10.1136/rmdopen-2023-003531
Biosimilars Gastroenterology Roundup for November 2024—Podcast Edition
December 1st 2024On this episode of Not So Different, we discuss market changes in the adalimumab space; calls for PBM transparency and biosimilar access reforms grew; new data for biosimilars in gastroenterology conditions; and all the takeaways from this year's Global Biosimilars Week.
Eye on Pharma: Golimumab Biosimilar Update; Korea Approves Denosumab; Xbrane, Intas Collaboration
December 10th 2024Alvotech and Advanz Pharma have submitted a European marketing application for their golimumab biosimilar to treat inflammatory diseases, while Celltrion secured Korean approval for denosumab biosimilars, and Intas Pharmaceuticals partnered with Xbrane Biopharma on a nivolumab biosimilar.
Breaking Barriers in Osteoporosis Care: New Denosumab Biosimilars Wyost, Jubbonti Approved
June 16th 2024In this episode, The Center for Biosimilars® delves into the FDA approval of the first denosumab biosimilars, Wyost and Jubbonti (denosumab-bbdz), and discuss their potential to revolutionize osteoporosis treatment with expert insights from 2 rheumatologists.
Cost and Efficacy Insights on Infliximab Biosimilars in Pediatric Uveitis
December 3rd 2024The study highlights the safety, efficacy, and cost benefits of infliximab biosimilars in managing pediatric noninfectious uveitis, showing fewer disease flares and reduced costs compared with reference infliximab, as well as the influence of insurance mandates on treatment decisions.
Perceptions of Biosimilar Switching Among Veterans With IBD
December 2nd 2024Veterans with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) prioritize shared decision-making, transparency, and individualized care in biosimilar switching, favoring delayed switching for severe cases and greater patient control.