A real-world study using data from the French National Health Data System, found no significant differences in treatment persistence or safety between anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α biosimilars and reference products in all indications of these biologics.
A real-world study using data from the French National Health Data System, which covers 99% of the French population, found no significant differences in treatment persistence or safety between anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α biosimilars and reference products in all indications of these biologics.
TNF-α plays an important role in immune-mediated inflammatory diseases by inducing transcription factor activity and signaling pathways that lead to, for example, immune cell activation and release of pro-inflammatory cytokines. Monoclonal antibodies targeting TNF, including etanercept, infliximab, and adalimumab are expensive but they “have significantly improved the therapeutic care of immune-mediated inflammatory diseases,” the authors said. However, biosimilars have lowered the cost of treatment. In Europe, there are 4 approved infliximab biosimilars starting in 2015, 12 adalimumab biosimilars starting in 2018, and 4 etanercept biosimilars starting in 2016 have been approved and are on the market in Europe.
Data from the French National Health Data System was used to identify patients initiating therapy with infliximab, adalimumab, and etanercept between 2015 and 2021. Patients were followed for 1 year after initiation, and persistence and safety were compared between those treated with reference products and biosimilars. There were 86,776 patients included in the study, 22,670 treated with infliximab, 24,442 treated with etanercept, and 39,664 treated with adalimumab. About half of patients (49,752; 53%) initiated treatment with biosimilars. The investigators reported that baseline patient characteristics were similar between originator and biosimilar users within each molecule.
Risk of Discontinuation Either Similar or Lower in Biosimilar Groups
For patients receiving infliximab, 39% of patients on the biosimilar discontinued treatment, compared to 38% on the reference product. For etanercept, 46% of patients on the biosimilar discontinued treatment, compared to 52% on the reference product. For adalimumab, 43% of patients in both biosimilar and reference product groups discontinued treatment. In their analysis, the authors found no significant differences in the risk of discontinuation between biosimilar and reference product groups overall.
In some subgroups, however, the risk of discontinuation was lower in patients receiving biosimilar treatment: infliximab treatment in Crohn disease (adjusted HR [aHR]; 0.83; 95% CI, 0.71-0.96), mainly in patients using CT-P13; etanercept treatment in rheumatoid arthritis (aHR, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.78-0.93), ankylosing spondylitis (aHR, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.80-0.96), and psoriasis (aHR, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.65-1.00); and adalimumab treatment of ankylosing spondylitis (aHR, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.81-0.97).
No Significant Differences in Adverse Event Rates
The investigators reported, “across molecules, adverse event rates were mostly similar.” The most frequently observed adverse events were severe infection, all-cause hospitalization, and death. There were no significant differences between biosimilar- and originator-treated patients within each molecule.
The authors concluded their study showed no differences in persistence and safety in real-world use of anti-TNF biosimilars compared to their reference products in all licensed indications. To their knowledge, this is the largest real-world cohort of infliximab, etanercept, and adalimumab biosimilar and originator users, and the first to be assessed for persistence and safety. They added that their results suggest anti-TNF biosimilars can be “used more broadly in order to limit the financial impact of these molecules on health systems.”
Reference
Jourdain H, Hoisnard L, Sbidian E, Zureik M. Persistence and safety of anti-TNF biosimilars versus originators in immune-mediated inflammatory diseases: an observational study on the French National Health Data System. RMD Open. 2024;10(1):e003531. doi:10.1136/rmdopen-2023-003531
Eye on Pharma: EU Aflibercept Approvals; Biosimilars Canada Campaign; Celltrion Data
November 19th 2024The European Commission grants marketing authorization to 2 aflibercept biosimilars; Biosimilars Canada launches new campaign to provide sustainable solutions to employers; Celltrion shares positive data for 2 biosimilars.
Breaking Barriers in Osteoporosis Care: New Denosumab Biosimilars Wyost, Jubbonti Approved
June 16th 2024In this episode, The Center for Biosimilars® delves into the FDA approval of the first denosumab biosimilars, Wyost and Jubbonti (denosumab-bbdz), and discuss their potential to revolutionize osteoporosis treatment with expert insights from 2 rheumatologists.
Challenges, Obstacles, and Future Directions for Anti-TNF Biosimilars in IBD
November 9th 2024A review article on tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α inhibitors in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) outlined current use of anti-TNF originators and biosimilars, their efficacy and safety, the benefits and challenges of biosimilars, and the future of biosimilars in IBD.
Biosimilars Gastroenterology Roundup for May 2024—Podcast Edition
June 2nd 2024On this episode of Not So Different, we review the biggest gastroenterology biosimilar stories from May 2024, covering new data from conferences and journals on infliximab and adalimumab products that demonstrate positive clinical results and confirm the safety of these biosimilars, as well as the feasibility of switching to them.
Eye on Pharma: Henlius, Organon Updates; Meitheal Portfolio Expansion; Celltrion Zymfentra Data
November 5th 2024Henlius and Organon’s pertuzumab biosimilar met phase 3 goals; Meitheal expanded its US biosimilars; Celltrion’s subcutaneous infliximab (Zymfentra) showed monotherapy could be as effective as combination therapy for inflammatory bowel disease.