Rituximab, primarily used as a second-line biologic therapy, was used in a cost-saving and adverse-event reducing on-demand schedule in 94.6% of patients; these patients were assessed for signs of relapse and the need for another rituximab infusion at their regularly scheduled visits, and they also had the option of contacting a healthcare provider by phone if they felt that they were relapsing.
Recent studies, including the ALTERRA study, have reported that low and very low doses of rituximab are effective in treating rheumatoid arthritis (RA), and a new study that describes the real-world use of rituximab in a single center in Spain suggests that a low dose of rituximab, administered on-demand rather than at predetermined intervals, provides a good long-term treatment option for some patients.
The retrospective cohort study considered adult patients with RA who were treated with rituximab from 2005 to 2014, with a follow-up period through 2015. In total, 114 patients with 409 cycles of treatment were considered.
Rituximab, primarily used as a second-line biologic therapy, was used in a cost-saving and adverse-event reducing on-demand schedule in 94.6% of patients; these patients were assessed for signs of relapse and the need for another rituximab infusion at their regularly scheduled visits, and they also had the option of contacting a healthcare provider by phone if they felt that they were relapsing. The remaining 5.4% of patients were on a fixed 6-month dosing schedule.
The researchers report that the median number of rituximab cycles per patient was 3 (range, 1-11), and a dose of 1000 mg, versus the standard 2000 mg, was used in 31.8% of treatment cycles. Overall, 91.5% of first cycles used the recommended 2000 mg dose, but the percentage of doses that used the 1000 mg dose rose to 80% to 100% of patients with more than 6 cycles of treatment.
Overall, there was an average disease activity improvement after rituximab administration after each cycle. Duration of response could only be measured in the on-demand cycles (n = 314). The median response duration for patients with on-demand treatment was 10 months (interquartile range, 7-13).
A multivariable analysis revealed that older age (65 years or older) and higher number of rituximab cycles were significantly associated with longer response duration. When rituximab was used as a third biologic or higher, the response duration was approximately 2 months shorter than in those patients who used the drug as a first- or second-line therapy. The dose per cycle was not associated with response duration.
“Our data suggest that, after a successful first cycle of 2000 mg, retreatments with rituximab can be scheduled as cycles of 1000-mg single [infusions]…resulting in a comfortable schedule of treatment with acceptable control of disease activity in most patients,” conclude the authors.
Reference
Cañamares-Orbis I, Merino L, López J, et al. Experience with the use of rituximab for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis in a tertiary hospital in Spain: RITAR study. [Published online July 19, 2018.] J Clin Rheumatol. doi: 10.1097/RHU.0000000000000845.
How State Substitution Laws Shape Insulin Biosimilar Adoption
April 15th 2025States with fewer restrictions on biosimilar substitution tend to see higher uptake of interchangeable insulin glargine, showing how even small policy details can significantly influence biosimilar adoption and expand access to more affordable insulin.
How AI Can Help Address Cost-Related Nonadherence to Biologic, Biosimilar Treatment
March 9th 2025Despite saving billions, biosimilars still account for only a small share of the biologics market—what's standing in the way of broader adoption and how can artificial intelligence (AI) help change that?
Early Success of Adalimumab Biosimilars Featured at AMCP 2025
April 5th 2025High adherence rates, comparable clinical effectiveness, and cost savings have marked the early adoption of adalimumab biosimilars in the US, particularly in formulary-driven transitions, as shown in 2 retrospective studies presented at the Academy of Managed Care Pharmacy annual meeting (AMCP 2025).
Will the FTC Be More PBM-Friendly Under a Second Trump Administration?
February 23rd 2025On this episode of Not So Different, we explore the Federal Trade Commission’s (FTC) second interim report on pharmacy benefit managers (PBMs) with Joe Wisniewski from Turquoise Health, discussing key issues like preferential reimbursement, drug pricing transparency, biosimilars, shifting regulations, and how a second Trump administration could reshape PBM practices.
Patients With IBD Maintain Therapy 2 Years Post Switching to Infliximab Biosimilar
March 23rd 2025People with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) who switched to the infliximab biosimilar CT-P13 had higher treatment persistence (84% and 91%) than those new to infliximab (66% and 53%), with no new safety concerns.