With anti–tumor necrosis factor (TNF) therapy showing promise in treating coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), authors called for these agents to have a higher priority in research.
With the world’s pharmaceutical industry turning its eyes toward finding treatments for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), authors of a commentary piece urge investigators to prioritize investigating anti–tumor necrosis factor (TNF) therapies.
“The potential of anti-TNF therapy as a treatment for COVID-19 is supported by both biological plausibility and observational clinical data,” the authors wrote. "Few current treatments under investigation have this level of supportive evidence."
Anti-TNF drugs, such as reference and biosimilar versions of infliximab, etanercept, and adalimumab molecules, are used to neutralize TNF, a cytokine signaling protein that causes inflammation related to a number of rheumatic conditions including rheumatoid arthritis, psoriatic arthritis, plaque psoriasis, ankylosing spondylitis, and inflammatory bowel disease (IBD).
“There is a long history of safe use of anti-TNF therapy in a diverse range of diseases, and supply is plentiful with many originator products available as well as many biosimilars,” the authors wrote. "Anti-TNF therapy now has huge potential. We need to urgently investigate its value through prioritization of clinical trial resources worldwide."
COVID-19–related inflammation is linked to elevated concentrations of TNF as well as interleukin (IL)-6 and IL-8. The authors noted that a major component leading to COVID-19–related lung deterioration is capillary leak as a result of inflammation caused by these key cytokines.
Capillary leak involves the release of fluid and proteins from tiny blood vessels into surrounding tissue, potentially leading to dangerously low blood pressure; low albumin, a protein made by the liver; and low plasma volume.
“It is therefore conceivable that anti-TNF therapy could reduce inflammation-driven capillary leak in COVID-19 and have a major impact on the need for ventilation and mortality,” wrote the authors.
Accumulating Research
Data from the SECURE-IBD registry suggested that patients with IBD who are on anti-TNF therapies and develop a COVID-19 infection have equally good or better results compared with those using other agents.
Researchers found that anti-TNF therapies were inversely associated with the composite outcome of death or hospital admission for COVID-19 (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 0.60; 95% CI, 0.38-0.96; P = .03). However, they did not affect the composite of intensive care admission, ventilation or death, and death alone.
Data from the COVID-19 Global Rheumatology Alliance registry on 600 patients with rheumatic diseases showed that anti-TNF therapy, used alone or in combination with other immunomodulatory drugs, was associated with a lower rate of hospital admission for COVID-19 (adjusted OR of 0.40; 95% CI, 0.19-0.81; P = .01) than for patients who did not use disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs.
When anti-TNF agents were used as monotherapy, the adjusted OR went down to 0.30 (95% CI, 0.11-0.79; P = .01) for hospital admissions.
A smaller trial of 77 patients with COVID-19 found that 40% and 13% those using non-TNF drugs for a pre-existing condition required ventilator support or died, respectively.
Although these trials are meaningful and important, there are many underway of all types, and patient recruitment challenges are anticipated.
Additionally, CATALYST, a randomized trial investigating the effects of a biosimilar infliximab (Remsima) in patients with COVID-19, is currently recruiting in the United Kingdom, where hospital admissions are low and accrual is expected to be slow.
A study is also ongoing at Tufts Medical Center in Boston, Massachusetts, in 17 patients and a prehospital study is planned in the United Kingdom to establish whether anti-TNF therapy can prevent milder COVID-19 cases from becoming severe.
“The potential of anti-TNF therapy as a treatment for COVID-19 is supported by both biological plausibility and observational clinical data. Few current treatments under investigation have this level of supportive evidence,” wrote the authors.
Data Limitations
The data from the SECURE-IBD and COVID-19 Global Rheumatology Alliance registries also have limitations in that comparators consist of other patients with rheumatic diseases or IBD. Those comparators may respond differently to COVID-19 due to changes in their immune system.
Also, patients with rheumatic diseases who take anti-TNF therapies likely have been on these therapies for a considerable amount of time prior to contracting COVID-19, making it hard to discern whether a first administration of anti-TNF therapy would yield the same results.
“It is therefore unknown whether the anti-TNF therapy results found in these registries are generalizable to the public,” the authors noted.
The number of current case reports on the use of anti-TNF therapies in patients with COVID-19 is small.
Reference
Robinson PC, Richard D, Tanner HL, Feldmann M. Accumulating evidence suggests anti-TNF therapy needs to be given trial priority in COVID-19 treatment. Lancet Rheumtaol. Published online September 4, 2020. doi:10.1016/ S2665-9913(20)30309-Xpubm
Boosting Health Care Sustainability: The Role of Biosimilars in Latin America
November 21st 2024Biosimilars could improve access to biologic treatments and health care sustainability in Latin America, but their adoption is hindered by misconceptions, regulatory gaps, and weak pharmacovigilance, requiring targeted education and stronger regulations.
Biosimilars Development Roundup for October 2024—Podcast Edition
November 3rd 2024On this episode of Not So Different, we discuss the GRx+Biosims conference, which included discussions on data transparency, artificial intelligence (AI), and collaboration to enhance the global supply chain for biosimilars and generic drugs, as well as the evolving requirements for biosimilar devices.
Breaking Down Biosimilar Barriers: Interchangeability
November 14th 2024Part 3 of this series for Global Biosimilars Week, penned by Dracey Poore, director of biosimilars at Cardinal Health, explores the critical topic of interchangeability, examining its role in shaping biosimilar adoption and the broader implications for accessibility.
Exploring the Biosimilar Horizon: Julie Reed's Predictions for 2024
February 18th 2024On this episode of Not So Different, Julie Reed, executive director of the Biosimilars Forum, returns to discuss her predictions for the biosimilar industry for 2024 and beyond as well as the impact that the Forum's 4 new members will have on the organization's mission.
BioRationality: Should mRNA Copies Be Filed as NDAs or Biosimilars?
November 4th 2024The article by Sarfaraz K. Niazi, PhD, argues that the FDA’s classification of future copies of messenger RNA (mRNA) products could be reconsidered, suggesting they might be eligible for new drug applications (NDAs) or a hybrid biosimilar category due to their unique characteristics and increasing prevalence.
Panelists Stress Stakeholder Education to Build Confidence in Biosimilars
October 31st 2024By expanding educational initiatives to clarify biosimilar safety, efficacy, and interchangeability, stakeholders can foster trust, improve access, and ensure that biosimilars are widely accepted as high-quality, cost-effective alternatives to originator biologics.