Sarfaraz K. Niazi, PhD, a professor, entrepreneur, and biosimilar advocate, took aim at criticisms of the Inflation Reduction Act to 2022 that was passed in the Senate and critiques the argument that the bill should be considered a “price control” measure.
On August 7, the US Senate approved the Inflation Reduction Act of 2022 strictly by political divide line, with the vice president breaking the majority vote.
This act allows Medicare to negotiate prices of 10 drugs first and then expand later. This bill caps seniors’ out-of-pocket spending for prescription drugs at $2000 per year. In addition, 13 million Americans covered under the Affordable Care Act will see their health insurance premiums reduced by $800 on average. Senate Republicans on Sunday blocked a $35 monthly cap on the patient out-of-pocket cost of insulin in the private market, though it stays for Medicare patients.
While everything looks good for patients, a barrage of negative views of the bill has filled the media, hoping to turn it at the House level. Opposing this bill are the Biosimilars Council and its parent Association for Affordable Medicines, both with a charter to reduce the cost of drugs to patients. Craig Burton, Executive Director of Biosimilars Council, said that the "price control" will hurt the industry.
However, there is no mention of price control in the bill; it is price negotiation, and no one is forced to accept it. No change is made in the exclusivity of biological drugs so that it will not hurt big pharma; it will help the adoption of biosimilars as they are in a better position to negotiate.
In a letter to vice president Kamala Harris, I recorded the history of my involvement since meeting the CMS in 2019, when I found them disconnected and disinterested in reducing the cost of Medicare; my suggestion was to allow Medicare to negotiate the pricing that required Congressional approval—we have it now.
Those opposing this bill are misleading the public by calling it "price control." Those responsible for reducing the drug cost, which is 5 times greater for Americans compared to the following country, are influenced by big pharma. Biosimilar Council's position is entirely misleading, failing to fulfill the purpose of their association. It is sad the politics take charge of the humanitarian causes.
Author Bio
Sarfaraz K. Niazi, PhD, is an adjunct professor of biopharmaceutical Sciences at the College of Pharmacy at the University of Illinois at Chicago and a patent law practitioner. Additionally, he is the founder and executive chariman at Pharmaceutical Scientist, Inc, the executive chairman of Karyo Biologics, and the founder of Adello Biologics, which was acquired by Kashiv Biosciences in 2019. Niazi also serves on the advisory board for The Center for Biosimilars®.
13 Strategies to Avoid the Nocebo Effect During Biosimilar Switching
December 18th 2024A systematic review identified 13 strategies, including patient and provider education, empathetic communication, and shared decision-making, to mitigate the nocebo effect in biosimilar switching, emphasizing the need for a multifaceted approach to improve patient perceptions and therapeutic outcomes.
Biosimilars Policy Roundup for September 2024—Podcast Edition
October 6th 2024On this episode of Not So Different, we discuss the FDA's approval of a new biosimilar for treating retinal conditions, which took place in September 2024 alongside other major industry developments, including ongoing legal disputes and broader trends in market dynamics and regulatory challenges.
BioRationality: Withdrawal of Proposed Terminal Disclaimer Rule Spells Major Setback for Biosimilars
December 10th 2024The United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO)’s withdrawal of its proposed terminal disclaimer rule is seen as a setback for biosimilar developers, as it preserves patent prosecution practices that favor originator companies and increases costs for biosimilar competition, according to Sarfaraz K. Niazi, PhD.
Commercial Payer Coverage of Biosimilars: Market Share, Pricing, and Policy Shifts
December 4th 2024Researchers observe significant shifts in payer preferences for originator vs biosimilar products from 2017 to 2022, revealing growing payer interest in multiple product options, alongside the increasing market share of biosimilars, which contributed to notable reductions in both average sales prices and wholesale acquisition costs.
Perceptions of Biosimilar Switching Among Veterans With IBD
December 2nd 2024Veterans with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) prioritize shared decision-making, transparency, and individualized care in biosimilar switching, favoring delayed switching for severe cases and greater patient control.