House Bill 4005 requires drug manufacturers to compile a report on a prescription drug if the price was $100 or more for a 1-month supply (or course of treatment lasting less than 1 month) and if the net price increased by 10% or more.
Earlier this week, Oregon Governor Kate Brown, D, signed a bill that looks to provide more transparency around drug pricing.
House Bill 4005 requires drug manufacturers to compile a report on a prescription drug if the price was $100 or more for a 1-month supply (or course of treatment lasting less than 1 month) and if the net price increased by 10% or more.
For drugs that fit into these criteria, manufacturers would need to provide information to explain the factors that contributed to the price increase, such as:
Under the law, pharmaceutical companies must provide these reports by July 2019.
In addition, the bill creates a drug pricing task force and mandates that Oregon’s Department of Consumer and Business Services post a list of high drug price increases. Furthermore, the bill also requires that insurers show how these drug prices affect premiums.
“Every Oregonian should be able to access the medications and treatments that allow them to live healthy, productive lives. This bill brings greater transparency around drug pricing, an important step towards making life-saving and essential drugs more affordable,” said Governor Brown in a statement.
As soon as the bill was signed, the pharmaceutical industry responded.
“[The law] will have a chilling effect on an innovative industry and do nothing to empower patients or lower their prescription drug costs,” said Biotechnology Innovation Organization’s CEO, Jim Greenwood, in a statement.
According to the National Academy for State Health Policy, state legislatures are currently considering 78 bills to regulate pharmacy benefit managers (PBMs), 48 that focus on drug pricing transparency, 11 that address so-called "price-gouging" and more on a variety of other topics, including the importation of drugs.
The proposed bills have received pushback from the industry, with pharmaceutical companies sending lobbyists to state governments around the country, according to Kaiser Health News.
Other states, including Louisiana, Nevada, Maryland, North Carolina, and Vermont have also passed measures that aim to increase transparency in drug pricing.
Boosting Health Care Sustainability: The Role of Biosimilars in Latin America
November 21st 2024Biosimilars could improve access to biologic treatments and health care sustainability in Latin America, but their adoption is hindered by misconceptions, regulatory gaps, and weak pharmacovigilance, requiring targeted education and stronger regulations.
Biosimilars Policy Roundup for September 2024—Podcast Edition
October 6th 2024On this episode of Not So Different, we discuss the FDA's approval of a new biosimilar for treating retinal conditions, which took place in September 2024 alongside other major industry developments, including ongoing legal disputes and broader trends in market dynamics and regulatory challenges.
Breaking Down Biosimilar Barriers: Interchangeability
November 14th 2024Part 3 of this series for Global Biosimilars Week, penned by Dracey Poore, director of biosimilars at Cardinal Health, explores the critical topic of interchangeability, examining its role in shaping biosimilar adoption and the broader implications for accessibility.
Breaking Down Biosimilar Barriers: Payer and PBM Policies
November 13th 2024Part 2 of this series for Global Biosimilars Week dives into the complexities of payer and pharmacy benefit manager (PBM) policies, how they impact biosimilar accessibility, and how addressing these issues may look under a second Trump term.