Organizations reacted this week to news that CMS is raising Part B premiums with a variety of opinions, as CMS blamed rising drug prices for the increase.
Organizations reacted this week to news that CMS is raising Part B premiums with a variety of opinions, as CMS blamed rising drug prices for the increase.
“The increase in the Part B premiums and deductible is largely due to rising spending on physician-administered drugs,” CMS said last week. “These higher costs have a ripple effect and result in higher Part B premiums and deductible.”
Yearly adjustments to all parts of Medicare are made according to the Social Security Act. For 2020, the new costs for most beneficiaries are:
The majority of beneficiaries (70%) pay the standard amount; a minority of upper-income beneficiaries pay more. However, the standard increase for Part B in 2019 was much more modest ($1.50); in addition, the CMS announcement follows a small (1.6%) cost-of-living adjustment to 2020 benefits in 2020, which was pointed out by the AARP.
“This announcement is another clear example of how prescription drug prices are rising faster than inflation and how drug company greed is hurting seniors. With Medicare premiums increasing nearly 7% while Social Security payments will increase less than 2%, Congress needs to immediately act to lower prescription drug prices,” said Nancy LeaMond, AARP’s executive vice president and chief advocacy and engagement officer.
The Biosimilars Forum also chimed in, criticizing Congress and the administration for not doing enough to increase access to biosimilars, saying that the 9 biosimilars available in Part B cost about 30% less than the reference products. They said that beneficiaries “are often denied access to or unaware a lower-cost option exists due to misaligned incentives that favor the higher-cost product.”
The forum, which represents 8 biosimilar developers, has been advocating for ending out-of-pocket cost for biosimilars, saying such a move could save as much as $3.3 billion and increase access. In the statement, the forum highlighted 3 bipartisan bills that have been introduced in Congress:
The BIOSIM act is also included in the drug pricing plan preferred by House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-California, although it will not be considered by the Senate, even as seriously ill beneficiaries continue to struggle with healthcare costs. Meanwhile, President Trump is said to prefer a bipartisan Senate bill, but that does not have unanimous Republican support either.
Senators Introduce Bipartisan Legislation to Protect Skinny Labeling
January 2nd 2025To close out the year, 4 senators came together to introduce a new bipartisan bill to protect biosimilar and generic drug manufacturers from patent litigation when obtaining “skinny label” approvals for their products.
Biosimilars Policy Roundup for September 2024—Podcast Edition
October 6th 2024On this episode of Not So Different, we discuss the FDA's approval of a new biosimilar for treating retinal conditions, which took place in September 2024 alongside other major industry developments, including ongoing legal disputes and broader trends in market dynamics and regulatory challenges.
How Vertical Integration Drives Innovation and Access in Biosimilars
December 27th 2024Elie Bahou, PharmD, highlights how vertical integration in the biosimilar industry streamlines costs, improves supply reliability, accelerates market adoption, and enhances patient access, while emphasizing the value of collaboration, quality control, and value-based contracts for sustainable health care delivery.
13 Strategies to Avoid the Nocebo Effect During Biosimilar Switching
December 18th 2024A systematic review identified 13 strategies, including patient and provider education, empathetic communication, and shared decision-making, to mitigate the nocebo effect in biosimilar switching, emphasizing the need for a multifaceted approach to improve patient perceptions and therapeutic outcomes.
BioRationality: Withdrawal of Proposed Terminal Disclaimer Rule Spells Major Setback for Biosimilars
December 10th 2024The United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO)’s withdrawal of its proposed terminal disclaimer rule is seen as a setback for biosimilar developers, as it preserves patent prosecution practices that favor originator companies and increases costs for biosimilar competition, according to Sarfaraz K. Niazi, PhD.