Organizations reacted this week to news that CMS is raising Part B premiums with a variety of opinions, as CMS blamed rising drug prices for the increase.
Organizations reacted this week to news that CMS is raising Part B premiums with a variety of opinions, as CMS blamed rising drug prices for the increase.
“The increase in the Part B premiums and deductible is largely due to rising spending on physician-administered drugs,” CMS said last week. “These higher costs have a ripple effect and result in higher Part B premiums and deductible.”
Yearly adjustments to all parts of Medicare are made according to the Social Security Act. For 2020, the new costs for most beneficiaries are:
The majority of beneficiaries (70%) pay the standard amount; a minority of upper-income beneficiaries pay more. However, the standard increase for Part B in 2019 was much more modest ($1.50); in addition, the CMS announcement follows a small (1.6%) cost-of-living adjustment to 2020 benefits in 2020, which was pointed out by the AARP.
“This announcement is another clear example of how prescription drug prices are rising faster than inflation and how drug company greed is hurting seniors. With Medicare premiums increasing nearly 7% while Social Security payments will increase less than 2%, Congress needs to immediately act to lower prescription drug prices,” said Nancy LeaMond, AARP’s executive vice president and chief advocacy and engagement officer.
The Biosimilars Forum also chimed in, criticizing Congress and the administration for not doing enough to increase access to biosimilars, saying that the 9 biosimilars available in Part B cost about 30% less than the reference products. They said that beneficiaries “are often denied access to or unaware a lower-cost option exists due to misaligned incentives that favor the higher-cost product.”
The forum, which represents 8 biosimilar developers, has been advocating for ending out-of-pocket cost for biosimilars, saying such a move could save as much as $3.3 billion and increase access. In the statement, the forum highlighted 3 bipartisan bills that have been introduced in Congress:
The BIOSIM act is also included in the drug pricing plan preferred by House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-California, although it will not be considered by the Senate, even as seriously ill beneficiaries continue to struggle with healthcare costs. Meanwhile, President Trump is said to prefer a bipartisan Senate bill, but that does not have unanimous Republican support either.
Boosting Health Care Sustainability: The Role of Biosimilars in Latin America
November 21st 2024Biosimilars could improve access to biologic treatments and health care sustainability in Latin America, but their adoption is hindered by misconceptions, regulatory gaps, and weak pharmacovigilance, requiring targeted education and stronger regulations.
Biosimilars Policy Roundup for September 2024—Podcast Edition
October 6th 2024On this episode of Not So Different, we discuss the FDA's approval of a new biosimilar for treating retinal conditions, which took place in September 2024 alongside other major industry developments, including ongoing legal disputes and broader trends in market dynamics and regulatory challenges.
Breaking Down Biosimilar Barriers: Interchangeability
November 14th 2024Part 3 of this series for Global Biosimilars Week, penned by Dracey Poore, director of biosimilars at Cardinal Health, explores the critical topic of interchangeability, examining its role in shaping biosimilar adoption and the broader implications for accessibility.
Breaking Down Biosimilar Barriers: Payer and PBM Policies
November 13th 2024Part 2 of this series for Global Biosimilars Week dives into the complexities of payer and pharmacy benefit manager (PBM) policies, how they impact biosimilar accessibility, and how addressing these issues may look under a second Trump term.