Organizations reacted this week to news that CMS is raising Part B premiums with a variety of opinions, as CMS blamed rising drug prices for the increase.
Organizations reacted this week to news that CMS is raising Part B premiums with a variety of opinions, as CMS blamed rising drug prices for the increase.
“The increase in the Part B premiums and deductible is largely due to rising spending on physician-administered drugs,” CMS said last week. “These higher costs have a ripple effect and result in higher Part B premiums and deductible.”
Yearly adjustments to all parts of Medicare are made according to the Social Security Act. For 2020, the new costs for most beneficiaries are:
The majority of beneficiaries (70%) pay the standard amount; a minority of upper-income beneficiaries pay more. However, the standard increase for Part B in 2019 was much more modest ($1.50); in addition, the CMS announcement follows a small (1.6%) cost-of-living adjustment to 2020 benefits in 2020, which was pointed out by the AARP.
“This announcement is another clear example of how prescription drug prices are rising faster than inflation and how drug company greed is hurting seniors. With Medicare premiums increasing nearly 7% while Social Security payments will increase less than 2%, Congress needs to immediately act to lower prescription drug prices,” said Nancy LeaMond, AARP’s executive vice president and chief advocacy and engagement officer.
The Biosimilars Forum also chimed in, criticizing Congress and the administration for not doing enough to increase access to biosimilars, saying that the 9 biosimilars available in Part B cost about 30% less than the reference products. They said that beneficiaries “are often denied access to or unaware a lower-cost option exists due to misaligned incentives that favor the higher-cost product.”
The forum, which represents 8 biosimilar developers, has been advocating for ending out-of-pocket cost for biosimilars, saying such a move could save as much as $3.3 billion and increase access. In the statement, the forum highlighted 3 bipartisan bills that have been introduced in Congress:
The BIOSIM act is also included in the drug pricing plan preferred by House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-California, although it will not be considered by the Senate, even as seriously ill beneficiaries continue to struggle with healthcare costs. Meanwhile, President Trump is said to prefer a bipartisan Senate bill, but that does not have unanimous Republican support either.
From Amjevita to Zarxio: A Decade of US Biosimilar Approvals
March 6th 2025Since the FDA’s groundbreaking approval of Zarxio in 2015, the US biosimilars market has surged to 67 approvals across 18 originators—though the journey has been anything but smooth, with adoption facing hurdles along the way.
Will the FTC Be More PBM-Friendly Under a Second Trump Administration?
February 23rd 2025On this episode of Not So Different, we explore the Federal Trade Commission’s (FTC) second interim report on pharmacy benefit managers (PBMs) with Joe Wisniewski from Turquoise Health, discussing key issues like preferential reimbursement, drug pricing transparency, biosimilars, shifting regulations, and how a second Trump administration could reshape PBM practices.
Biosimilars Policy Roundup for September 2024—Podcast Edition
October 6th 2024On this episode of Not So Different, we discuss the FDA's approval of a new biosimilar for treating retinal conditions, which took place in September 2024 alongside other major industry developments, including ongoing legal disputes and broader trends in market dynamics and regulatory challenges.
CHMP Pushes 3 Biosimilars Forward, Spelling Hope for Ophthalmology, Supportive Care Markets
February 6th 2025The European Medicines Agency’s Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use (CHMP) recommended 3 biosimilars and new indications for reference biologics, moving them closer to final European approval and expanding patient access.
The Banking of Biosimilars: Insights From a Leading Health Economist
February 4th 2025Biosimilars have the potential to reduce health care costs and expand patient access, but economic and policy barriers affect adoption, explored James D. Chambers, PhD, MPharm, MSc, associate professor at the Tufts Medical Center Institute for Clinical Research and Health Policy Studies, in an interview.