Mkaya Mwamburi, MD, PhD, MA, president and CEO of the biotechnology consulting firm profecyINTEL, said in a presentation at the 2017 SMi Biosimilar North America conference that manufacturers of originator biologics are taking the lead on biosimilar development.
Mkaya Mwamburi, MD, PhD, MA, president and CEO of the biotechnology consulting firm profecyINTEL, said in a presentation at the 2017 SMi Biosimilar North America conference that manufacturers of originator biologics are taking the lead on biosimilar development.
With a US market that Mwamburi says is currently valued at $5.2 billion—and is projected to reach $28.2 billion by 2020—biosimilars are becoming a more attractive investment opportunity for reference product sponsors. While makers of originator products have thus far attempted to retain market share through a variety of defensive strategies—“We’ve seen this through legal barriers being raised, and extensions of patent protection,” said Mwamburi—the coming patent cliff has forced sponsors to think about what Mwamburi calls “bi-vesting,” or diversifying revenue streams by moving into the biosimilars space. The future of biologic therapies, said Mwamburi, “…is going to involve a lot of buying, selling, and licensing between companies.”
An originator developer’s investment in biosimilars can involve 1 of 3 strategies for sharing risk and revenue: acquiring a biosimilar company, entering into a partnership with a biosimilar developer, or entering into a licensing partnership on a regional or global scale. He highlighted partnerships and acquisitions involving Pfizer—Celltrion, Novartis–Sandoz, and Amgen–Allergan as representatives of the emerging “symbiotic dynamic.”
Whether they occupy the originator biologic or biosimilar space, drug makers should carefully consider the value that they bring to a potential partnership before solidifying a deal, said Mwamburi.
Originator biologics developers’ considerations should include the following:
Biosimilar developers open to acquisition or partnership should:
Mwamburi sees the growing trend of investment on both sides of the reference and biosimilar divide as a positive trend for the industry; “Any variations in how [the legal] tug-of-war is going to happen is going to quickly stabilize” as drug makers learn how best to approach the issue of biosimilar market entry. He foresees patent negotiations eventually moving more quickly, and predicts that there will be more drug companies engaging in faster, less costly negotiations instead of litigation. “With those barriers getting out of the way, you’ll find the influx of biosimilars coming in.”
How AI Can Help Address Cost-Related Nonadherence to Biologic, Biosimilar Treatment
March 9th 2025Despite saving billions, biosimilars still account for only a small share of the biologics market—what's standing in the way of broader adoption and how can artificial intelligence (AI) help change that?
From Amjevita to Zarxio: A Decade of US Biosimilar Approvals
March 6th 2025Since the FDA’s groundbreaking approval of Zarxio in 2015, the US biosimilars market has surged to 67 approvals across 18 originators—though the journey has been anything but smooth, with adoption facing hurdles along the way.
Will the FTC Be More PBM-Friendly Under a Second Trump Administration?
February 23rd 2025On this episode of Not So Different, we explore the Federal Trade Commission’s (FTC) second interim report on pharmacy benefit managers (PBMs) with Joe Wisniewski from Turquoise Health, discussing key issues like preferential reimbursement, drug pricing transparency, biosimilars, shifting regulations, and how a second Trump administration could reshape PBM practices.
The Biosimilar Void: 90% of Biologics Coming Off Patent Will Lack Biosimilars
February 5th 2025Of the 118 biologics losing exclusivity over the next decade, only 10% have biosimilars in development, meaning a vast majority of biologics have no pipeline, which limits savings potential for the health care system.