Last week, the US Patent and Trademark Office’s Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) ruled to invalidate AbbVie’s patent on a method of treating rheumatoid arthritis using adalimumab (Humira). The PTAB deemed the claims in question unpattentable because of their obviousness.
Last week, the US Patent and Trademark Office’s Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) ruled to invalidate AbbVie’s patent on a method of treating rheumatoid arthritis (RA) using adalimumab (Humira). The PTAB deemed the claims in question unpattentable because of their obviousness.
Boehringer Ingelheim (BI) entered its petition to the PTAB in 2016, asking it to review claims 1 through 5 of AbbVie’s US Patent 8,889,135 (“the '135 patent”) for a method of treating rheumatoid arthritis (RA) by administering a dose of 40 mg of an anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) drug subcutaneously every 13 to 15 days for a period of time “sufficient to treat” RA. In its petition, BI relied on several studies that detailed the efficacy of anti-TNF treatments for RA to demonstrate the obviousness of the patent’s claims.
The PTAB decision brings BI one step closer to an eventual launch of its adalimumab biosimilar candidate, BI 695501. In January, the company announced that the product had been accepted for regulatory review at both the FDA and the European Medicines Agency (EMA), and in June, BI presented phase 3 results demonstrating that the biosimilar and reference adalimumab have equivalent clinical efficacy and similar safety and immunogenicity profiles. “If approved by regulatory authorities [BI 695501] will increase the treatment options for patients with autoimmune diseases, while contributing to the long-term sustainability of healthcare systems,” said Karsten Kissel, MD, head of global medical affairs for biosimilars at BI.
BI was not the first company to successfully challenge AbbVie’s patents on adalimumab. Coherus BioSciences, as it seeks to launch its own adalimumab biosimilar, CHS-1420, also prevailed against AbbVie in a May inter partes review proceeding for the same 5 claims of the ‘135 patent. This spring, Coherus announced that its adalimumab biosimilar had met the primary endpoints of its bioequivalence study. Meanwhile, in the European marketplace, the EMA’s Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use delivered a positive opinion on Biogen’s adalimumab biosimilar (to be marketed as Imraldi) after a UK court struck down AbbVie’s European patents for adalimumab.
Global sales of adalimumab totaled $16.08 billion in 2016, an increase of 14.7% over its 2015 sales. Competition from biosimilar products, however, as well as from new, less expensive small-molecule anti-rheumatic drugs, is expected to erode AbbVie’s adalimumab profits in the years ahead.
Enhancing Adoption of Infused Biosimilars for a Sustainable Future
October 30th 2024An IQVIA report highlights challenges to the sustainability of infused biosimilars in the US, citing rebate walls and reimbursement policies, and proposes key solutions to enhance adoption and benefits for all stakeholders.
Biosimilars Policy Roundup for September 2024—Podcast Edition
October 6th 2024On this episode of Not So Different, we discuss the FDA's approval of a new biosimilar for treating retinal conditions, which took place in September 2024 alongside other major industry developments, including ongoing legal disputes and broader trends in market dynamics and regulatory challenges.
Strengthening the Supply Chain: Key Insights From FDA Commissioner Dr Robert Califf
October 25th 2024At the GRx+Biosims conference, FDA Commissioner Robert Califf, MD, stressed the urgent need for data transparency in the global supply chain and the role of collaboration and artificial intelligence in ensuring the resilience of biosimilar and generic drug production.
FDA and Industry Experts Unpack Biosimilar Device Requirements
October 23rd 2024At the GRx+Biosims 2024 conference, a panel of industry experts and FDA officials discussed evolving device requirements for biosimilars and interchangeable biosimilars, highlighting new approaches to comparative use human factors studies, regulatory challenges, and alternative validation methods.