Nielsen, a global measurement and data analytics company, recently revealed that direct-to-consumer healthcare advertising has reached 75% of US cancer survivors on television.
Nielsen, a global measurement and data analytics company, recently revealed that direct-to-consumer (DTC) healthcare advertising has reached 75% of US cancer survivors on television.
“Survivors will look to many sources to increase their knowledge about the disease, become more informed about treatment options and learn about ways to reduce future risk of recurrence,” according to Neilsen. The report also states that the sources individuals value most are linked with how long they have had their diagnoses.
Those who have been diagnosed for 1 to 2 years are more alert to healthcare advertising, according to Nielsen, than average cancer survivors. This group is 28% more likely than the average survivor to report having seen advertising at a pharmacy, 23% more likely to report having seen ads on the internet, and 15% more likely to report having seen ads in direct mail. They are also 35% more likely to value information that they read in newspaper advertising than in other media.
Nielsen also indicates that this group of survivors is more likely than the average cancer survivor to ask their physicians to prescribe a specific drug as a result of having seen healthcare advertising.
Such numbers are of particular interest given the Trump administration’s push to require DTC television advertisements for drugs to contain drug pricing information. The proposal, which is part of the administration’s focus on curbing the increasing price of drugs, has been met with resistance from drug makers; According to Stephen Ubl, president and CEO of the trade group Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America, disclosing the list price in TV advertisements may discourage patients from seeking needed medical care. Ubl also noted that if a requirement was implemented to disclose such information it would “raise significant legal issues, including First Amendment concerns.”
From Amjevita to Zarxio: A Decade of US Biosimilar Approvals
March 6th 2025Since the FDA’s groundbreaking approval of Zarxio in 2015, the US biosimilars market has surged to 67 approvals across 18 originators—though the journey has been anything but smooth, with adoption facing hurdles along the way.
How AI Can Help Address Cost-Related Nonadherence to Biologic, Biosimilar Treatment
March 9th 2025Despite saving billions, biosimilars still account for only a small share of the biologics market—what's standing in the way of broader adoption and how can artificial intelligence (AI) help change that?
Will the FTC Be More PBM-Friendly Under a Second Trump Administration?
February 23rd 2025On this episode of Not So Different, we explore the Federal Trade Commission’s (FTC) second interim report on pharmacy benefit managers (PBMs) with Joe Wisniewski from Turquoise Health, discussing key issues like preferential reimbursement, drug pricing transparency, biosimilars, shifting regulations, and how a second Trump administration could reshape PBM practices.
The Banking of Biosimilars: Insights From a Leading Health Economist
February 4th 2025Biosimilars have the potential to reduce health care costs and expand patient access, but economic and policy barriers affect adoption, explored James D. Chambers, PhD, MPharm, MSc, associate professor at the Tufts Medical Center Institute for Clinical Research and Health Policy Studies, in an interview.