Higher levels of cancer-related financial toxicity are associated with decreased quality of life, poorer treatment adherence, and poorer survival for adult patients with cancer.
There’s a national health and economic crisis hiding in plain sight that causes patients and families fighting cancer to be unable to adhere to their treatment plans and instead drives them to financial ruin and shortens their lives: cancer-related financial toxicity (CRFT). The pervasive effects of CRFT as a result of disease-related income loss and increased out-of-pocket (OOP) costs associated with cancer treatment are explored in a new white paper, “Cancer-Related Financial Toxicity and its Pervasive Effects on Patients and Families: Solving a National Health and Economic Crisis Hiding in Plain Sight,” produced by Family Reach, a national nonprofit organization dedicated to alleviating the financial burden of cancer, with the support of Xcenda.
Direct medical expenditures for cancer are projected to total at least $158 billion by 2020, and patients and their families pay about $4 billion per year in OOP costs associated with cancer treatment. The substantial financial effect on families can be catastrophic; CRFT is a debilitating side-effect of cancer treatment, the white paper suggests, and occurs when the OOP costs of treatment are high relative to a family’s already diminished income, as treatment often requires patients and families to reduce work hours significantly. Part of the fallout from CRFT, in addition to the social and clinical consequences of cancer, such as reduced quality of life and increased psychosocial hardship, are poorer treatment adherence and decreased survival.
CRFT is widespread among patients with cancer and their families. Up to 73% of adult patients with cancer experience some sort of CRFT, which causes a chain-reaction of ill effects:
It is not just uninsured patients who face catastrophic financial burdens. Even insured patients are vulnerable to CRFT because many have insurance plans with high levels of cost-sharing. Many patients, especially lower-income patients, are attracted to insurance plans with lower monthly premiums, but learn later that they have to pay high OOP costs for cancer care. Compounding the situation, OOP costs for cancer recurrence can be up to 3 times greater than OOP costs experienced for the initial treatment.
The need for interventions to alleviate CRFT is increasing, in part because of a steady rise in cost-sharing health insurance plans. Premiums for family coverage have increased 20% since 2011 and 58% since 2006. Other forms of cost-sharing, such as deductibles, copayments, and coinsurance, have also increased.
Family Reach concludes that a multicomponent approach to financial interventions will help to address CRFT. “Financial navigation, financial planning, education, and financial assistance provided to patients early and throughout their cancer journey will likely have the greatest impact on reducing financial barriers to treatment adherence and improving disease outcomes.”
Biosimilars Policy Roundup for September 2024—Podcast Edition
October 6th 2024On this episode of Not So Different, we discuss the FDA's approval of a new biosimilar for treating retinal conditions, which took place in September 2024 alongside other major industry developments, including ongoing legal disputes and broader trends in market dynamics and regulatory challenges.
Similar Survival, Safety for Bevacizumab Biosimilar vs Originator in Colorectal Cancer
February 8th 2025A retrospective observational study found no significant differences in progression-free survival or safety in patients with colorectal cancers in Japan treated with ABP 215, Amgen’s bevacizumab biosimilar, or reference bevacizumab (Avastin), and estimated cost savings of 800,000 Japanese yen (approximately $5100) per patient with the biosimilar.
CHMP Pushes 3 Biosimilars Forward, Spelling Hope for Ophthalmology, Supportive Care Markets
February 6th 2025The European Medicines Agency’s Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use (CHMP) recommended 3 biosimilars and new indications for reference biologics, moving them closer to final European approval and expanding patient access.