Patient organizations for those with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) are upset with the government of British Columbia for a plan to shift patients to biosimilars over the next 6 months.
Patient organizations for those with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) are upset with the government of British Columbia for a plan to shift patients to biosimilars over the next 6 months.
As announced by the province last week, patients with Crohn disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC) will have 6 months to move from reference infliximab (Remicade) to either of the infliximab biosimilars, Inflectra and Renflexis. After March 5, 2020, PharmaCare, a publicly funded drug coverage program, will stop coverage for Remicade for these indications, except in certain circumstances.
Earlier this year, British Columbia became the first Canadian province to mandate that patients currently taking reference biologics for rheumatology indications and for diabetes must be switched to biosimilars over a 6-month period.
Patients are opposed to the conceit of nonmedical switching, or moving patients off the reference product purely for financial or for formulary reasons.
“We believe the onus is on payers (government or private) to negotiate with manufacturers of innovative biologics and their biosimilars to protect options for patient care,” wrote Gail Attara, president and chief executive officer of the Gastrointestinal Society and president of the Canadian Society of Intestinal Research. “It is reasonable to expect that manufacturers should lower prices when drugs are no longer on patent.”
She also said IBD is a difficult condition to manage and switching someone without knowing the consequence could stir mental and emotional risk, including the nocebo effect. Attara also said that Canada has a different healthcare system than Europe, where different countries may have different payment systems and models that could influence biosimilar uptake.
Canada has a significantly lower use rate for biosimilars, at approximately 8%. Other European Union countries have upwards of 50% to 95%; Attara said the actual percentages vary based on the age of the biosimilar.
Separately, Crohn’s and Colitis Canada released an updated position statement on biosimilars; while noting that biosimilars are safe and effective, the organization said the “decision to switch a patient from a biologic drug to its biosimilar should be based on patient/doctor choice.”
It also released a survey of gastroenterologists, nurses, patients, and caregivers that showed just more than 50% of gastroenterologists and IBD nurses agreed that a 1-time switch for patients with IBD from a reference biologic to a biosimilar was acceptable.
Asked about the possibility of a switch, patients said they would need support, including additional and dedicated appointments with their specialists and nurses, education and communication, and financial information and support.
Crohn’s and Colitis Canada also said that if the price difference between the reference product and the originator is ever eliminated, policy makers should stop mandatory nonmedical switches.
The Top 5 Most-Read Gastroenterology Articles of 2024
December 21st 2024The top gastroenterology biosimilar news from 2024 highlight fluctuations in the adalimumab biosimilar market throughout the year, while FDA and European approvals for ustekinumab biosimilars are set to improve access and reduce costs for patients with Crohn disease and ulcerative colitis.
Biosimilars Gastroenterology Roundup for November 2024—Podcast Edition
December 1st 2024On this episode of Not So Different, we discuss market changes in the adalimumab space; calls for PBM transparency and biosimilar access reforms grew; new data for biosimilars in gastroenterology conditions; and all the takeaways from this year's Global Biosimilars Week.
13 Strategies to Avoid the Nocebo Effect During Biosimilar Switching
December 18th 2024A systematic review identified 13 strategies, including patient and provider education, empathetic communication, and shared decision-making, to mitigate the nocebo effect in biosimilar switching, emphasizing the need for a multifaceted approach to improve patient perceptions and therapeutic outcomes.
Biosimilars Policy Roundup for September 2024—Podcast Edition
October 6th 2024On this episode of Not So Different, we discuss the FDA's approval of a new biosimilar for treating retinal conditions, which took place in September 2024 alongside other major industry developments, including ongoing legal disputes and broader trends in market dynamics and regulatory challenges.
Stable Patient Satisfaction Found After Switching From the Humira or Biosimilar CT-P17
December 14th 2024A real-world study in France found patient satisfaction was stable after switching from either the reference product or a low-concentration adalimumab biosimilar to the adalimumab biosimilar CT-P17, a high-concentration, citrate-free formulation.
BioRationality: Withdrawal of Proposed Terminal Disclaimer Rule Spells Major Setback for Biosimilars
December 10th 2024The United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO)’s withdrawal of its proposed terminal disclaimer rule is seen as a setback for biosimilar developers, as it preserves patent prosecution practices that favor originator companies and increases costs for biosimilar competition, according to Sarfaraz K. Niazi, PhD.